Posts: 53
From: sydney, nsw, oz
Registered: Jan 2006

posted March 26, 2006 09:14 PM         

---

How ya doing, guys.

Can someone help me please?

In a synastry chart if you have:

A's Sun trine B's Moon and

B's Sun sextile A's Moon

is this classed as a double whammy or does it have to be exact. Like both trine or sextile or whatever.

IP: Logged

Posts: 53
From: sydney, nsw, oz
Registered: Jan 2006

posted March 28, 2006 08:49 PM         

---

C'mon on guys! Isn't there someone out there that can help? Maybe a fellow Taurean?
I know that they like helping people.

IP: Logged

Posts: 38
From:
Registered: Mar 2006

posted March 29, 2006 06:11 AM         

---

Hello,
I think that double whammy is any mutual aspect between particular planets, so your sextile/trine would be the double whammy. I have Arroyo's book "Relationships and Life Cycles", and that's what he considers double whammies, any either positive or negative aspect between any two planets, regardless whether they are two trines, or trine or sextile, or even trine and square, it just means that they will be felt differently if they are trine and square for example....

IP: Logged

Posts: 53
From: sydney, nsw, oz
Registered: Jan 2006

posted March 29, 2006 06:32 AM         

---

thanks for you info, Selena.
i appreciate it.

IP: Logged

Posts: 879
From: nevada
Registered: Jun 2005

posted March 29, 2006 10:24 AM         

---

Welcome Selena!

Yes to what Selena said , but to clarify double whammys are normally hard aspects.

example: your Moon squares/conjuncts/opposes hubbys Saturn and...

hubbys Moon squares/conjuncts/opposes your Saturn

so it would be 2 Moon/Saturn aspects in the comparison instead of just one.

One would show how you react (emotonally) to his Saturn
and the other would show how he reacts.

IP: Logged

Posts: 38
From:
Registered: Mar 2006

posted March 29, 2006 11:28 AM         

---

Thanks lalalinda,

There you go, I've just learnt something, it is only hard aspects. I mean, Arroyo does mention hard aspects double whammies in his book, but I thought that the same parallel could be applied to soft ones as well...Obviously not, though, thanks for claryfing this for us.

IP: Logged