|
Author
|
Topic: Reducing the name numbers?
|
jellyfishtry
Knowflake Posts: 25
From: UK
Registered: Apr 2013
|
posted April 12, 2013 05:05 PM
  
Hello again, i know i am asking too many questions, but just found about Chaldean numerology recently and such it had truth in it, i got into it.am reading so many different sources, most agree that only the name you use (first name usually, unless the middle is something like Peggy Sue or etc that you are called by) and family name are important, and you add these up. But then i keep coming across others that say these two names should be reduced to a single number and then you add that up....but that'll mean most people will be no higher than an 18, in your opinions which is the best way of adding the name...am 'practicing' this and i see just adding the first name and the family name without reducing them is accurately describing the person i'd be analyzing.... but such i just started would rather hear what those who have read and tried this more than i think. Goodness that was so wordy...thank you for reading, and so sorry about my writing skills!!  IP: Logged |
Randall
Webmaster Posts: 26855
From: Saturn next to Charmainec
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted April 13, 2013 10:27 AM
You add and reduce (unless 11 or 22) each name (first and last only) and then add the two up. You will be surprised at how high you can sometmes get with a compound number. IP: Logged |
jellyfishtry
Knowflake Posts: 25
From: UK
Registered: Apr 2013
|
posted April 13, 2013 01:39 PM
thank you so much for the reply Randall  ...okay still confused so bear with me as i know am a bit slow at times (just a little and just at the beginning of things...) and am probably not getting it right...if we add and then reduce....then the highest two numbers would be two 22's and that will just be 44.....
alright what am i missing and doing this all wrong?? IP: Logged |
Randall
Webmaster Posts: 26855
From: Saturn next to Charmainec
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted April 13, 2013 05:22 PM
Most of the great compound numbers are in that range.IP: Logged |
jellyfishtry
Knowflake Posts: 25
From: UK
Registered: Apr 2013
|
posted April 14, 2013 10:19 AM
thanks for the reply. yeah i know most are in that range, but if we keep adding 22 or 11 as the largest number and to only certain numbers how would we end up with say 36??okay am sure there is something am missing so i'll just go read more resources.... thanks for taking the time to answer though  IP: Logged |
Randall
Webmaster Posts: 26855
From: Saturn next to Charmainec
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted April 14, 2013 11:23 AM
You wouldn't get a 36 with a person's name--unless you had a middle name that you are commonly called by that goes with your first. But entities and book titles and such would. Still, there are some great numbers left. IP: Logged |
jellyfishtry
Knowflake Posts: 25
From: UK
Registered: Apr 2013
|
posted April 14, 2013 11:52 AM
Ah okay finally got it then!!4got about non-human entities lol!! Thank you so much for the help  IP: Logged |
Randall
Webmaster Posts: 26855
From: Saturn next to Charmainec
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted April 15, 2013 10:40 AM
 IP: Logged |
Lindaland
UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! 
