Posts: 1125
From:
Registered: Jun 2014

posted November 04, 2016 10:22 PM            

---

Ok.. I'm sure someone else has thought about this...?

I'm curious as to why this doesn't seem to be something mentioned in astrology? Are the moons too small? Are they just representative of the planets variation of energy?

If we look at the huge list of a lot of the asteroids we use, I'm curious about why it doesn't seem we have many people talking about the moons of planets.

Any thoughts?

IP: Logged

Posts: 71744
From: Saturn next to Charmaine
Registered: Apr 2009

posted November 05, 2016 08:04 AM            

---

Probably because they are tied to the Planet? Size doesn't matter. Some Asteroids are very powerful, and Pluto is the most powerful Planet, according to Linda.

IP: Logged

Posts: 370
From:
Registered: Jul 2016

posted November 05, 2016 10:21 AM            

---

asteroids orbit the sun, that's why we use their meanings

a planet's moon sure has meaning but only for the creatures that live on that planet (moons of Mars for instance), and not for us living on Earth

IP: Logged

Posts: 1586
From: On a Meteor 3 parsecs from you
Registered: Sep 2012

posted November 05, 2016 12:12 PM            

---

through feeling the planets is how we came up with their interpretations. we didn't just decide that that light blue planet we see, we would just name it jupiter and choose its effects.

all planets moon's are within 0.0000001 the distance away from the planet from our view on earth.

they are "fused" in the energy sense. and always have been.

IP: Logged

Posts: 1125
From:
Registered: Jun 2014

posted November 05, 2016 01:16 PM            

---

Yeah! Makes sense. Kinda was thinking it was partly because they are tied to the planets. I guess a part of me was kind of like "well, even if.." lol..

IP: Logged