Author
|
Topic: Why ANTIFA Are The Moral Equivalent Of Nazis
|
Randall Webmaster Posts: 84750 From: From a galaxy, far, far away... Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted August 31, 2017 07:20 PM
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/yes-antifa-is-the-moral-equivalent-of-neo-nazis/2017/08/30/9a13b2f6-8d00-11e7-91d5-ab4e4bb76a3a_story.html?utm_term=.3a0633670afa IP: Logged |
Catalina Knowflake Posts: 4968 From: shamballa Registered: Aug 2013
|
posted September 01, 2017 12:06 AM
So many stories from the "fake" "left" media suddenly.. at the same time as you preach about how much they ignore or even support antifa. Another equation fail?IP: Logged |
teasel Knowflake Posts: 10694 From: Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted September 01, 2017 12:38 AM
It would have been nice to see you spend as much time slamming the actual nazis who have been crawling out from their holes. IP: Logged |
Randall Webmaster Posts: 84750 From: From a galaxy, far, far away... Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted September 01, 2017 12:47 AM
ANTIFA is far more dangerous, by their numbers and their propensity for violence.IP: Logged |
Randall Webmaster Posts: 84750 From: From a galaxy, far, far away... Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted September 01, 2017 06:40 AM
They don't care about fighting Nazis. That's just an excuse. They are anarchists and communists trying to destroy America. Only criminals cover their faces.IP: Logged |
jwhop Knowflake Posts: 10333 From: Madeira Beach, FL USA Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted September 01, 2017 04:40 PM
Nancy Pee-Lousy condemns ANTIFA!No doubt, it's finally dawning on some democrats that ANTIFA is being connected to democrats in the minds of American voters. So, it's time to put some distance between ANTIFA and democrats. Nancy Pelosi condemns antifa for violence in California Mandy Mayfield Aug 29, 2017 http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/nancy-pelosi-condemns-antifa-for-violence-in-california/article/2632914 IP: Logged |
teasel Knowflake Posts: 10694 From: Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted September 01, 2017 05:20 PM
quote: Originally posted by jwhop: Nancy Pee-Lousy condemns ANTIFA!No doubt, it's finally dawning on some democrats that ANTIFA is being connected to democrats in the minds of American voters. So, it's time to put some distance between ANTIFA and democrats. [b]Nancy Pelosi condemns antifa for violence in California Mandy Mayfield Aug 29, 2017 http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/nancy-pelosi-condemns-antifa-for-vi olence-in-california/article/2632914 [/B]
She condemns them, and yet you still insult her via your gross nickname. IP: Logged |
Catalina Knowflake Posts: 4968 From: shamballa Registered: Aug 2013
|
posted September 01, 2017 06:30 PM
Whayever she said it would be wrong but its a good excuse for a nasty nickname worthy of a third grade bullyIP: Logged |
Randall Webmaster Posts: 84750 From: From a galaxy, far, far away... Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted September 01, 2017 06:35 PM
Yes, I heard on Tucker Carlson last night that she did. Schumer and Warren are still silent. The left doesn't like to denounce the left. IP: Logged |
shura Knowflake Posts: 1076 From: kamaloka Registered: Jun 2009
|
posted September 01, 2017 08:15 PM
She's a lying soulless witch as are the majority of her congressional comrades. As such, she's denouncing Antifa solely because she's been given to understand popular opinion is turning as news of their revolutionary aims and violent methods becomes undeniable. (well, undeniable to reasonable people) That and because she knows the DoJ is hard on Antifa's ass .... and the public servants who have assisted them. She's simply positioning herself in the best political place possible. No more, no less.IP: Logged |
jwhop Knowflake Posts: 10333 From: Madeira Beach, FL USA Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted September 03, 2017 06:41 PM
quote: Originally posted by teasel: She condemns them, and yet you still insult her via your gross nickname.
PeeLousy isn't condemning ANTIFA because she disagrees with them. PeeLousy is trying to distance democrats from their violence prone soulmates in ANTIFA...for political reasons. Nothing laudatory there. IP: Logged |
Randall Webmaster Posts: 84750 From: From a galaxy, far, far away... Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted September 03, 2017 09:39 PM
A CNN representative took to the mic and provoked ANTIFA to violence at their last "rally."IP: Logged |
teasel Knowflake Posts: 10694 From: Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted September 03, 2017 09:57 PM
I read something earlier that I might link to later. When it comes to antifa versus nazis, I'll side with antifa. IP: Logged |
teasel Knowflake Posts: 10694 From: Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted September 03, 2017 09:59 PM
And I might pay more attention to those denouncing antifa, if they came out with the same force against nazis. No talk of peaceful rallies when they are chanting against and attacking black people and Jews, IP: Logged |
Randall Webmaster Posts: 84750 From: From a galaxy, far, far away... Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted September 03, 2017 10:53 PM
You should denounce both, not side with one over the other.IP: Logged |
Randall Webmaster Posts: 84750 From: From a galaxy, far, far away... Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted September 04, 2017 09:14 PM
http://conservativetribune.com/cnn-panic-man-identified/?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=opslens&utm_campaign=can&utm_content=2017-09-04 IP: Logged |
jwhop Knowflake Posts: 10333 From: Madeira Beach, FL USA Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted September 05, 2017 12:01 AM
Yeah Randall, just what some of us have been saying for some time now; there are no journalists at CNN and MSNBC. They're political activists and the political propaganda arm of the democrat party.They have no credibility left to lose. IP: Logged |
pire Knowflake Posts: 2655 From: France Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted September 05, 2017 06:45 AM
Jwhop you imply that either you are a follower of Trump or you are on the adversary camp, i.e. that of CNNI think you miss something, and you probably do it on purpose, as usual, I think it is possible to be aware of the preaching of CNN while not be overly influenced, but simply agreeing on the analysis of president Trump's qualities, and I think that Fox news is quite unapologetically preaching too IP: Logged |
pire Knowflake Posts: 2655 From: France Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted September 05, 2017 06:47 AM
France, Britain, Germany, Australia, Mexico, ... the rest of the world basically, doesn't watch CNN...IP: Logged |
Catalina Knowflake Posts: 4968 From: shamballa Registered: Aug 2013
|
posted September 05, 2017 11:33 AM
Fox's unofficial but well known name..GOPTV. Rupert Murdoch's stock-in-trade, tabloids 😉 Breitbarts avowed purpose, to bring down the liberal establishment (not the establishment, just thr liberal side)Nothing to see here, just say it isnt so!🤡 IP: Logged |
jwhop Knowflake Posts: 10333 From: Madeira Beach, FL USA Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted September 05, 2017 04:41 PM
It must be embarrassing.. for leftists when it's shown they don't know what they're talking about. In this case, leftists have attempted to assert that Fox News...and Fox management are big, big, big fans and supporters of Candidate Trump, President Elect Trump and President Trump.Nothing could be further from the truth. Fox News...on orders from Murdoch attempted to derail the Trump Presidential candidacy. It's laughable when leftists throw out Fox News as supporters of President Trump or attempt to link the President with Fox News. Leftists...don't read this. Reading this will destroy all your talking points about Fox News. "In an extensive 2016 article within New York Magazine, mostly outlining the rather sordid details of Roger Ailes, readers may also noted confirmation from August of (2015). Fox News owner Rupert Murdoch instructed Fox News executives to take down candidate Donald Trump. Excerpt: (NY MAG) […] Murdoch was not a fan of Trump’s and especially did not like his stance on immigration. (The antipathy was mutual: “Murdoch’s been very bad to me,” Trump told me in March.) A few days before the first GOP debate on Fox in August 2015, Murdoch called Ailes at home. “This has gone on long enough,” Murdoch said, according to a person briefed on the conversation. Murdoch told Ailes he wanted Fox’s debate moderators — Kelly, Bret Baier, and Chris Wallace — to hammer Trump on a variety of issues. Ailes, understanding the GOP electorate better than most at that point, likely thought it was a bad idea. “Donald Trump is going to be the Republican nominee,” Ailes told a colleague around this time. But he didn’t fight Murdoch on the debate directive. On the night of August 6, in front of 24 million people, the Fox moderators peppered Trump with harder-hitting questions. But it was Kelly’s question regarding Trump’s history of crude comments about women that created a media sensation. He seemed personally wounded by her suggestion that this spoke to a temperament that might not be suited for the presidency. “I’ve been very nice to you, though I could probably maybe not be based on the way you have treated me,” he said pointedly. A July 2017 article written by Roger Ailes confidant Michael Wolff affirms one of the more transparently obvious hidden secrets in the 2015/2016 presidential race and election. Fox News owner/mogul Rupert Murdoch was intensely against the candidacy of Donald Trump. So much so that Murdoch instructed former President of Fox News, Roger Ailes, to shape favorable coverage toward anyone other than Donald Trump, including a request to tilt toward support for Hillary Clinton. New York – […] It was Ailes’ tacit support of Trump that, in part, made his removal from Fox all the more urgent for the Murdochs. And it was not just the liberal sons who were agitated by Ailes’ regard for Trump, but also the father, whose tabloid, the New York Post, helped create Trump, but who found him now, with great snobbery, not of “our” conservative class. (“When is Donald Trump going to stop embarrassing his friends, let alone the whole country?” Murdoch senior tweeted the day after Trump officially declared himself a candidate.) Murdoch instructed Ailes to tilt to anyone but Trump, Ailes confided to me before he was fired, even Hillary. (Ailes, for his part, characterized Murdoch’s periodic efforts at interference as similar to Nixon’s instructions to bomb this or that country — best ignored.) After the election, a confounded Murdoch had to call on his ex-wife Wendi’s friends, Ivanka Trump and Jared Kushner, to broker a rapprochement with the disreputable Donald. Now, to Trump’s great satisfaction, a humbled Murdoch is a constant caller. All intellectually honest media and political observers already knew this was the basic premise for Fox News in the 2015/2016 presidential race. Murdoch supported Jeb Bush and Marco Rubio as the frontrunners because each of them advanced policies that were beneficial to the interests of Rupert Murdoch. The August 2015 ambush by Murdoch’s princess Megyn Kelly was merely a highly visible example of Murdoch’s aversion to the ‘America-First’ agenda of Donald Trump. Ms. Kelly was later paid $10 million by Harper Collins, another Murdoch company, as compensation for services rendered, ie. advance payment on her book deal. http://theconservativetreehouse.com/2017/09/04/reminder-fox-news-rupert-murdoch-tucker-carlson-and-the-gope-amnesty-immigration-agenda/#more-138165 IP: Logged |
Catalina Knowflake Posts: 4968 From: shamballa Registered: Aug 2013
|
posted September 05, 2017 06:05 PM
Once again jwhop you attempt to malign unspecified "LEFTISTS" and pretend something was said that wasnt. But hey if it makes you feel better, knock yourself out.Meanwhile.. lovely site run by the National Alliance http://natall.com/ No multiracial society can be a truly healthy society And there's the difference between the two camps. Antifa have some over the top brutal members (as do most police forces!) who are responding violently to the intentions and behaviour of the Nazis (white nationalists).. not to the colour of their skin, which is all the Naxis need to call "enemy" and they want all nonwhites OUT. Behaviour can be changed. Skin colour cannot. Oh and by the way, Jews are considered NONWHITES here too.. regardless of their skin colour IP: Logged |
Catalina Knowflake Posts: 4968 From: shamballa Registered: Aug 2013
|
posted September 05, 2017 06:14 PM
Your misdirection aside, DUMPTY himself believes Fox are mostly on his side and helped him get elected. including goodbud Toupee SeanIP: Logged |
jwhop Knowflake Posts: 10333 From: Madeira Beach, FL USA Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted September 05, 2017 06:58 PM
From the man who was there at Fox News.Argue with that! "In an extensive 2016 article within New York Magazine, mostly outlining the rather sordid details of Roger Ailes, readers may also noted confirmation from August of (2015). Fox News owner Rupert Murdoch instructed Fox News executives to take down candidate Donald Trump." Something else you should get through your head. People protesting the removal of statues of historical figures were not and are NOT NAZIS. But, the so called anti-fascist ANTIFA are fascists of the Socialist, Communist, Anarchist, Progressive thug variety. IP: Logged |
Catalina Knowflake Posts: 4968 From: shamballa Registered: Aug 2013
|
posted September 05, 2017 07:02 PM
Read. The. Website. Jwhop. It aint about statues."You will not replace US" was not about statues. Internal politics at Fox... meh. The proof is in the pudding. Rupert knows how publicity works just as well as the Dondon does. Ratings ratings ratings.. one of his fave words innit? But your link? according to a person briefed on the conversation..really? Isn't that the kind of source you caterwaul about when writers you don't like say things you dont like? IP: Logged |