|
Author
|
Topic: I'm just now finding this forum on LL
|
llewsacm
Knowflake Posts: 400
From: Cleveland, Ohio USA
Registered: Mar 2015
|
posted June 22, 2016 10:19 PM
  
Been here for a bit and never realized this was here. This kinda stuff gets me going! Already read through some of the threads here...omg so interesting! I have my own ideas about conspiracy, illuminati, nwo, etc. 911 being staged, Denver airport, Rothschilds, etc. I'm going to enjoy reading the other posts as I have time. Very fascinating indeed! IP: Logged |
Valentine
Knowflake Posts: 705
From: Canada
Registered: Dec 2014
|
posted June 22, 2016 10:25 PM
Nice to have you join us, I'd like to hear your views.IP: Logged |
llewsacm
Knowflake Posts: 400
From: Cleveland, Ohio USA
Registered: Mar 2015
|
posted June 22, 2016 10:50 PM
Ty! In a nutshell...I've researched some conspiracy theories, enough to figure that any government, religion, etc is not out to provide a greater good to the people. We are all so programmed to think we are "safe" when greed and neglect for humankind are at work at the highest levels. I do not watch the news, nor t.v. As I believe it is a bunch of lies and conditioning to those who cannot think for themselves. Im enjoying what I am reading in these posts...makes me think my thoughts on various topics are not so outlandish as they may seem... IP: Logged |
Faith
Knowflake Posts: 18144
From: Bella's Hair Salon
Registered: Jul 2011
|
posted June 24, 2016 09:27 AM
Jet fuel can't melt steel beams.  Welcome to the forum.  IP: Logged |
Faith
Knowflake Posts: 18144
From: Bella's Hair Salon
Registered: Jul 2011
|
posted June 24, 2016 09:31 AM
By the way...I see this video used as proof far and wide, that jet fuel CAN melt steel... http://www.buzzfeed.com/javiermoreno/this-blac ksmith-addresses-the-jet-fuel-cant-melt-steel-beams?utm_term=.yjYGyqANe#.jpwybEqDN @1:30 he says that his steel was heated 300° higher than what jet fuel is capable of. And people call that "proof" and celebrate it. Wow. IP: Logged |
Randall
Webmaster Posts: 66566
From: Saturn next to Charmaine
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted June 24, 2016 10:56 AM
quote:
Originally posted by Faith:
Jet fuel can't melt steel beams. Welcome to the forum.
IP: Logged |
Randall
Webmaster Posts: 66566
From: Saturn next to Charmaine
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted June 25, 2016 03:26 PM
Enjoy the stuff on here.IP: Logged |
todd
Knowflake Posts: 893
From:
Registered: Jun 2009
|
posted June 25, 2016 05:47 PM
quote:
Originally posted by Faith:
By the way...I see this video used as proof far and wide, that jet fuel CAN melt steel... http://www.buzzfeed.com/javiermoreno/this-blac ksmith-addresses-the-jet-fuel-cant-melt-steel-beams?utm_term=.yjYGyqANe#.jpwybEqDN @1:30 he says that his steel was heated [b]300° higher than what jet fuel is capable of. And people call that "proof" and celebrate it. Wow.[/B]
this frigg ridiculous and idiotic, he did not melt the steel, he raised it to a temperature that the steel became malleable. this is not even close to the stream/rivers of molten steel that rained downed form the building. total BS jet fuel is essential kerosene . if kerosene could c melt steel, the jet engines themselves would melt. there is also the small problem of how 300 gallons of kerosene could spread out so evenly that 78 steel girders all melted and collapses at the exact same nano second. all the girders had to collapse exactly at the same time for the building to collapse like it did. even a 10 story build will fall sideways if the charges are not set of electronically at the exact same instant.
of course jets carry 3000 gallons of fuel, but 90% of that was burned in the immediate explosion. it is scientifically impossible for the scenario give to have occurred. to this day no government funded scientist has been unable to give a scientific explanation of how 300 gallons of kerosene brought down the buildings there are so many scientific reason why this was a fraud I can't mention them all here. one more example,though, Is that military jet pilots have said they would be very hard pressed to duplicate the maneuvers that some terrorist learned on a flight simulator. the there is the problem that the top speed that the 777 can fly at without the pilot losing control and without structure damage beginning to occur is 480 mile per hour. but the government claims these planes both came in a speeds of around 53o mile per hour. again at these claimed speed the "pilots" could have never made the maneuvers they did. you have to be psychotic to believe 911 happened as they say. todd IP: Logged |
Faith
Knowflake Posts: 18144
From: Bella's Hair Salon
Registered: Jul 2011
|
posted June 26, 2016 11:57 AM
Todd  I liked this article, too:
http://www.ae911truth.org/news/248-news-media-events-debunker-debunked-blacksmith.html Great picture featured there:  IP: Logged |
etherealsaturn
Knowflake Posts: 176
From: New York, USA
Registered: Sep 2014
|
posted July 01, 2016 02:17 PM
quote:
Originally posted by Faith:
Todd I liked this article, too:
[URL=http://www.ae911truth.org/news/248-news-media-events-debunker-debunked-blacksmith.html]http://www.ae911truth.org/news/248-news-media-events-debunker-debunked-blacksmith.html[/ URL] Great picture featured there:
This picture really makes a statement. IP: Logged |
Lindaland
UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! 
