Lindaland
  Astrology
  Which which is which which?

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Which which is which which?
alchemiest
unregistered
posted January 30, 2005 11:17 PM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I'm confused. There are two types of astrological charts (maybe even more, but I'm wondering about these two, anyway)- eastern 'vedic' charts, and western charts. They both have different calculations and placements of planets and signs etc in an individual horoscope. I think I mentioned this before, but here it is again. So anyway, how do you know which one is really 'you'? Or do they both describe the same thing but differently? Hmm... I dunno if that question makes sense... gaahhh so tirreddd tonight!!!
anyway, thanks in advance for anything you guys have to say on this subject.
peace.

IP: Logged

Archer
unregistered
posted January 31, 2005 02:12 AM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
many are in the same delima as to which which is which which! lol.

i won't to find that out too. the aspects remain the same both ways, only panetry positions change. i think western astro is more accurate as when there where astronomical changes taking place in studies in greece they din't reach india as the turks had captured constantinople (instanbul), the only land route to india. back then there were no sea routes.

also, i persnally i am more like an optimistic double sag with a earthy virgo asc rather than a determined double scorpio with an energetic leo asc. here is my pic...

what do u feel? double sag with virgo asc or double scorpio with leo asc...

IP: Logged

Secret Garden
unregistered
posted January 31, 2005 03:22 AM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
archer i would say dbl sag with virgo. theres a certain mutable quality about you rather than the other completely fixed option (leo and scorp). Also scorp influences tend to have very prominent, sharp, etc. eyes, and Im getting a softer feel from your look. Your pic looks kind of laid back which would be much more sag/virgo ish than Leos who are kinda flashy and have that mane going on.
You look like a combo of my maternal uncle (triple sag) and ex husband (double virgo). So i would def. say the sag/ virgo combo works better.

IP: Logged

whiterabbit
Newflake

Posts: 0
From:
Registered: Sep 2009

posted January 31, 2005 09:00 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for whiterabbit     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
yes. I agree.

IP: Logged

alchemiest
unregistered
posted January 31, 2005 05:41 PM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
LOL! I pretty much suck at telling people's signs from their physical characteristics, but I think you look more like a leo ascendant to me.

gahhh I think my stupid computer has a virus!!!!!

IP: Logged

alchemiest
unregistered
posted February 02, 2005 12:32 AM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
*bump*

IP: Logged

All times are Eastern Standard Time

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | Linda-Goodman.com

Copyright © 2011

Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.46a