|
Author
|
Topic: Davison or Composite Chart????
|
sweet_face
unregistered
|
posted June 17, 2005 01:32 PM
 
Which relationship chart is the MOST accuarte , i heard the davison chart was better?? But what do yall think?? Thanx !!!
xXxoXXxoxHugs and KissesXxXXoxXXx IP: Logged |
Tranquil Poet
unregistered
|
posted June 17, 2005 03:04 PM
I asked about this one. I rather go with both. I also heard the Davison one was also very accurate.
------------------
Gemini sun, Cancer rising, Taurus moon IP: Logged |
sweet_face
unregistered
|
posted June 17, 2005 04:14 PM
i could go with both but they say different things, the sun, mec, and venus was all diff. i dont know which 1 is right.IP: Logged |
geminstone
unregistered
|
posted June 17, 2005 09:14 PM
Hi Sweet_Face, There is another thread somewhere around here, that this was asked about. Here's what I can give on the differences in the two and what brain-storming another Knowflake came up with... The Composite Chart is cast by finding the mid-points between the planets of each chart.... I.E. the mid-points between the 2 Sun's, the 2 Moon's, the 2 Mercury's...etc... but, because this gives a placement based only on the placements of each in seperate charts, the Composite is useful, in and of itself, only.
The Davison Chart can be used in the same ways that an actual Birth/Natal Chart is used.... I.E. progressions, transits... etc. The reason being, that it takes into account the time/space factor and, in that, creates actual planetary placements. By that, I mean, the planets were, really, aligned that way in the heavens. It actually IS a Birth Chart, in that, it is an energy unique to the 2 individuals when they interact. So, the brain-storm which I have tried to find the thread but, with no luck, ... the idea suggested, was that the Composite might show how the couple is percieved by others and, the Davison may give more insight into the ' behind closed doors ' aspects of the energy created, the stuff that only the individuals involved would be able to validate.
.... I am, incredibly, sorry for my awful memory of names  Credit for that theory is due to Secret Garden or, Future_Uncertain,.... or possibly another .... gawd! My, sincerest apologies to whose brain gave this wonderful theory....  Thank You...
~ geminstone
IP: Logged |
sweet_face
unregistered
|
posted June 19, 2005 12:07 AM
Thanx for the artice it is very helpful..im thinkin the Davison chart is better ,its more personal than the composite.Alright then what does our Davison Chart say about the relationship:Sun -1Leo 31'11'in 4th house
Moon-26Scorpio 21'5'' in the 8th house
Mercury-20Cancer 21'44''in the the 4th house
Venus-20Gemini 16'10'' in the 3rd house
Mars-4Aries in the 12th house
Jupiter-0Gemini 22'28'' in the 2nd house
Saturn-26Sagittarius 59'14'' in the 9th house
Uranus-27Sagittarius 46'27''in the 9th house
Neptune-8Capricorn 11'31'' in the 9th house
Pluto-9Scorpio 45'50'' in the 7th house
Chiron-2Cancer 58'57'' in the 3rd house
True Node-15Pisces 0'6'' in the 12th house
AC:17 Aries 34'59'' MC:11 Capricorn 14'37'
2nd cusp-21 taurus55'
3rd cusp-17 Gemini57'
11th cusp-6 aquarius 6'
12th cusp-7 pisces 4' IP: Logged |
geminstone
unregistered
|
posted June 19, 2005 08:09 AM
I agree with you Sweet_Face. We rarely use a composite but, do know it enough, anyway.We like the Davison because, it really is 'Us', made 'We'. I'm curious if anyone who has pulled both types, have the Sun position opposite each other...? In our Composite Chart, we have a 12Leo Sun but, in our Davison Sun placement is at 14Aquarius. The houses are squared. 12 Leo is in 5th. 14Aquarius in the 8th. Our Aquarius Sun is conjunct Eros too!! Sorry Sweet_Face, I am still trying to get all of it figured out too! Hopefully someone with their knowing, can help you out soon...  ~ geminstone
IP: Logged | |
Lindaland
UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! 
