Author
|
Topic: astrological score?
|
libra78 unregistered
|
posted July 29, 2005 03:44 PM
Hi all,this site- http://astro-software.com/cgi-bin/astro/natal provides you with a total score based on your aspects and orbs (positive points for 'good' ones and negative points for 'bad' ones). I was wondering if anyone knows about this sort of thing? My judgement finds it weird to believe that we can be rated in this manner. If I get a higher score than you does that mean Im astrologically 'better' than you? Or better than you in general? weird and interesting.... comments appreciated. IP: Logged |
Hexxie unregistered
|
posted July 29, 2005 04:01 PM
hi libra78! i've never heard of this! i just did it tho and it's pretty interesting. i hope someone will know what this means! i got the most points for my venus conjunct uranus. lost the most points for moon opposed saturn. whatever this means lol. my value is worth 700 pts? did i win lol! i did like this site's graph thingys that showed the orbs and whatnot. thanks for posting this, i'm saving this site until someone can elaborate on this!! ------------------ ~Libra Sun / 29* Gemini Rising / Aquarius Moon~ IP: Logged |
ScotScorp unregistered
|
posted July 29, 2005 04:02 PM
I think it depends on what sun sign you're asking. JUST KIDDING!! IP: Logged |
hot_ice unregistered
|
posted July 29, 2005 04:10 PM
Oh yeah,I've seen this in another site too,wanted to ask you people about it but kinda forgot.... http://www.dailyscopes.com/birthchart.html Think most of you would have seen this,well is a very high score good or something?? Most of the popular peoples horoscopes have very high scores(??) It's a pretty weird website,uses the time for India as -5.30GMT,its supposed to be +5.30GMT...the chart was right but,cept for a minor discrepency with the position of saturn.... IP: Logged |
libra78 unregistered
|
posted July 29, 2005 04:12 PM
Hexxie: you came in second place since I got 1576 ScotScorp: What does the Scorpio have to say about all this? IP: Logged |
LILYGIRL unregistered
|
posted July 29, 2005 04:14 PM
As a novice, I can say I checked that little score sheet out a gazillion times last month. I hate those things; I think they can be very misleading, and I'll tell you why.My little brother has about 6 planets in Taurus. His score is over 2,000! The score basically glorifies the absence of conflict. Notice anything weird about his chart. He has 10 Feminine signs and no Fire and no Air. I would say that creates all kinds of horrific tension, conflict and heartache. By the way he is a sweet boy (man), relatively happily married (very late marriage) but extremely stubborn, with a temper and very very self-focused. He is brilliant and witty but a bit of an underachiever which is what a so called low conflict (2000+ ---2246 to be exact!!) score might get you. http://astro-softw are.com/cgi-bin/astro/natal?name=&sex=&d1day=11&d1month=5&d1year=1964&d1hour=21&d1min=15&citylist=Washington%2C+DC+%2811%29%2C+USA&lang=en I have about 1038 for my score, but I suspect a few more properly placed squares and a lower score would have helped me immensely. LOL. PS You can also get a low score when there are seemingly few aspects or multitudes of clashes and conflicts which deflate one's scores. PSS_: My spouse has a similar score as mine. It would be interesting for folks to compare their scores with their beloveds, betrotheds or otherwise sexed up significant others. I know someone who has a 500 married to a 97. Their composite score is -197!!!! I want to know about that relationship but I am to frightened to ask. LOL IP: Logged |
hot_ice unregistered
|
posted July 29, 2005 04:19 PM
My score-2047-378=1669 I win.... IP: Logged |
libra78 unregistered
|
posted July 29, 2005 04:21 PM
well since I dont win- I dismiss this scoring, and find it to be a scam LOLIP: Logged |
libra78 unregistered
|
posted July 29, 2005 04:24 PM
Lilly: Thank you for your very valid input. So does the couple with a -197 get along? I wonder if this score has 'any' significance now... maybe it means something else???IP: Logged |
LILYGIRL unregistered
|
posted July 29, 2005 04:30 PM
I am not sure what their story is. I don't know her, just him. The score card doesn't include vertices or fixed stars and selectively chooses while dismissing other aspects. Some people do better with opposites and squares than others. I think an overload, like this guy's wife who clearly has a gazillion conflicts in her head probably is difficult but I simply think an overwhelming plethora of trines and conjunctions creates its own kind of problems. Lack of drive, lack of creativity, lack of push you to the moon to be somebody and get it done drive. You know the drill. LOL. IP: Logged |
Gemini Nymph unregistered
|
posted July 29, 2005 04:34 PM
I strongly dislike the scores thing myself. You can do this with synastry too. The thing that is misleading is that you *don't* normally want a very high score. You actually should prefer a positive score somewhat above your negative score so you end up with a positive amount, but not excessively. A slightly higher negative scores not such a bad thing either. This holds true for synastry too. It's nor the end amount is what counts, but the difference between your positive and negative scores.Negative scores demonstrates the amount of conflict and tension, which stimulate change, growth, reflection, action, etc. Someone with a close positive and negative score has a good balance - they can handle the strain of the negative aspects, and make good use of them. This is a huge advantage over someone who has an enormously high positive score but few harsh aspect to give them a reality check and kick the pants when they need it. Everyone needs that from time to time. I had a positive 1189 and a negative 932, so I ended up with 257. They rated my strongest positive aspect my Sun-Merc conj 340, and my strongest negative aspect Jup-Sat opp -163. But what does that really mean? I don't need precise numbers to tell me my agreeable aspects help me cope successfully with my afflicted ones.
IP: Logged |
AcousticGod Knowflake Posts: 4416 From: Pleasanton, CA Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted July 29, 2005 04:35 PM
Well, I have a low score, and I kind of expected it. My chart is a bit challenging.977-452=525 Lots of interesting information put forth there. IP: Logged |
ScotScorp unregistered
|
posted July 29, 2005 05:50 PM
Libra: quote: well since I dont win- I dismiss this scoring, and find it to be a scam LOL
That's my opinion!!! Silly... IP: Logged |
libra78 unregistered
|
posted July 29, 2005 07:03 PM
ScotScorp:I apologize for my lack of prior knowing your Scorpio/Leo majesty. IP: Logged |
Ayumi unregistered
|
posted July 29, 2005 07:08 PM
My score was -4, and +3327 BURN I guess I win.... But you know what?? My ascendent was different from the one that astro.com calculated for me. and the characterisics listed ( though vague) were accurate for me even though the houses were "wrong". Did this happen to anyone else? Which chart should I beleive?* By the way, Thanks for posting this, it was fun! and about lots of trines= lack of drive and motivation?? right on. I have a HUGE problem with that. IP: Logged |
AcousticGod Knowflake Posts: 4416 From: Pleasanton, CA Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted July 29, 2005 07:46 PM
I'm guessing you have to redo yours. I would think some of your birth information was maybe entered incorrectly? In fact, it could be that it was entered wrong on astro.com. ? IP: Logged |
Ayumi unregistered
|
posted July 29, 2005 08:05 PM
actually no. I'm sure I entered it correctly in both places. the ascendent is only one sign off so its a matter of degrees. I wish i knew which one was right! Then I think,if it really makes that much of a difference to me, then maybe its time to STOP OBSESSING OVER ASTROLOGY. Seriously the more I learn the more limited I feel sometimes. Ya know?? IP: Logged |
running_bull Knowflake Posts: 104 From: usa Registered: Jul 2009
|
posted July 30, 2005 01:39 AM
mine was 676-325= 351 ...whatever, the score doesn't seem to have a purpose. it doesn't add to or take away from any aspect of my chart or person.------------------ "Stay Hungry. Stay Foolish." IP: Logged |
GemStar unregistered
|
posted July 30, 2005 09:18 AM
Daylight Savings Time is not auto-calculated with this program...make adjustments manually to receive a more accurate score.If the chart does not accurately reflect your houses, then for sure you must make an adjustment in the time zone to make up the difference....no cheating just to proclaim a higher score!! LOL!! IP: Logged |
ScotScorp unregistered
|
posted July 30, 2005 10:41 AM
78: Have I told you lately that I adore Libras?? *warm fuzzy*That's one of the first natal chart interpretation sites I went to last fall, but I never read any more into the site. My score? 1773 -234 1539 Angela
IP: Logged |
aries-chick unregistered
|
posted July 30, 2005 03:26 PM
L78, since the score is based on the amount of positive/negative aspects I've always taken it to show how easy or hard it is to be you and how comfortable you are in your own skin. I don't think it's meant to classify people as "astrologically better" or worse. . and similarly in synastry it'd show how challenging a relationship is, I guess..but some people prefer challenging to easy. and lol Ayumi, I know what you mean.. IP: Logged |
Lauren unregistered
|
posted August 29, 2005 09:15 AM
lol I was looking through past posts so I clicked on this..and since I'm watching a Goldie Hawn movie I looked up her score..and OMG it's none other than 52.. 52 lol is that even possible? I had to bump this.. so much for scores lol PS. her birthday: Nov.21, 1945, 9:20 AM EST Washington, DC, USA.. from: http://librarising.com/Rising/celebs/goldiehawn.html IP: Logged |
TheEvolution unregistered
|
posted August 29, 2005 11:31 AM
hell!!!look at my score! **** 3597 -57 = 3540 **** anybody dare compete? lol!
IP: Logged |
lalalinda Moderator Posts: 1120 From: nevada Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted August 29, 2005 12:22 PM
I found the interpretations insightful but don't get the scores at all. Maybe I should go back and re-read 666 -559 107 (psst that 666 doesn't look to good) IP: Logged |
sweetlibra unregistered
|
posted August 30, 2005 07:31 AM
My score1304 -434 = 870 Not impressive IP: Logged |