posted December 13, 2005 11:47 AM              

aaaanyway im a strange pixie.

posted December 17, 2005 11:18 AM              

Do you really think being a Pisces means "...dissolution away from ones higher true self..." ?

I would think it means a dissolution of boundaries, but not a total loss of your true self. I'd like to think that somewhere in this process, you don't leave yourself out. Please say it ain't so!

posted December 20, 2005 03:50 PM              

eh my pisces venus has let far too many people walk all over me... leaving my self a bit lost... possibly not the true self... but im getting older and wiser, thankfully.

posted December 20, 2005 06:08 PM              

quote:

---

pisces is a fish.. fish described the singular and the plural of the word.. so poor pisces has trouble asserting balance between the self and everyone else in a psychic sense.. leading to the dark aspects of neptune.. dissolution away from ones higher true self into the morass of others.

---

posted December 20, 2005 11:00 PM              

can you share more piscean mystery...
i understand the fire and earth that i have
in my nativity, as i seem to have those
sorts about me in my life...

but the watery mysteries, in both myself and
others elude me...

do i have to immerse myself in a cold bath to access this diluvian knowledge?

quote:

---

You wanted to be shown a picture of it before attempting to construct the puzzle, but then it would not be much of a puzzle, would it? You wanted to have no interpretation, and you ended up having an interpretation of having no interpretation. You wanted to be without becoming, and to become without being. You desired only to do the doable, and only to know the knowable. You are afraid of not having what you do not have. You are afraid of having what you have. You are afraid to brood upon the mystery, to cast away the meaning. You have believed in your own untruths so thoroughly that to suddenly not believe in them would be tantamount to your own negation. That you dwell in the hypothetical, that you conjecture, ponder, and consider, does this not prove how little you actually know? Speculation is the physiognomy of ignorance. After all, would a being who ‘knew’, ever choose to surmise?

You dissipate into yourself, in whichever realm you falsify by accepting; in whichever realm you claim or dispute; in whichever realm you release or hold, hallow or despise. You dissipate alike within transience and eternity, hope and resignation. If you were outside of it you could destroy it, but you are irrevocably ensconced within it. You are it. Oh, you will never know, and you will never not‑know. You live solicitously between the collapsed structures of two impossibilities. You will never know what you need know, and you will never unknow what you need unknow.

And yet, though you have swum blindly through the unknown depths like all the others, somehow, sometime, somewhere, suddenly something in you breaks through the surface, soaring into the immense, unliveable realms beyond all that is. In a breathless gulp of beingless rapture ...you finally have seen.

To gasp is to see.

Only the flying fish knows of the water.

http://www.iconoclastpress.com/bookPoetryFlyingFishAwakeningEnlightenmentEsotericPoem .htm

---

------------------
In this world we’re just beginning
To understand the miracle of living

posted December 22, 2005 12:10 PM              

In one sentence - Knowing that you know something other people don't know but never quite knowing what it is yourself. And it isn't scary, it's kind of wonderful.

And the inability to count properly as well unfortunately it seems.

posted December 24, 2005 01:27 PM            

He loves kissing, having a girlfriend, etc.. but he has no idea what the meaning of true love is. No idea. I have to give him advice sometimes on how to figure out how he feels about a relationship, lol.

posted December 24, 2005 01:36 PM              

Yes - the Uranus Singleton! I have one too ... Uranus in Leo in the 4th (my only Fire)...

posted December 24, 2005 02:45 PM              

quote:

---

His brain was preserved by Dr. Thomas Stoltz Harvey, the pathologist who performed the autopsy on Einstein. Harvey found nothing unusual with his brain, but in 1999 further analysis by a team at McMaster University revealed that his parietal operculum region was missing (The operculum is part of the inferior frontal gyrus of the frontal lobe in the brain. One famous part of the operculum is Broca's area which plays an important role in speech production) and, to compensate, his inferior parietal lobe was 15% wider than normal [12]. The inferior parietal region is responsible for mathematical thought, visuospatial cognition, and imagery of movement. Einstein's brain also contained 73% more glial cells than the average brain.

---

So he was lacking some speech skills yet had overdeveloped mathematical portion of the brain.