posted February 03, 2006 11:53 PM              

and all the successfull predictions since thousand's of years have just been a 'co-incidence'

then consider these...

1.there is no 'mathematical' proof to existance of gravitation. it is a widly accepted concept because observations show that bodies in the universe do tend to attract teach other. but there is no mathematical proof and besides the force also 'cannot be seen'. so shall we conculde that it is a co-incidence???

2.there is no 'mathematical' proof to the existance of atom. it has also never been 'seen'. it is widly accepted because everything is 'believed' to be composed of matter. shall we conclude that as there is no 'mathematical' proof it is just another 'co-incidence'???

3.as there is no proof to graviatation the mathematical calculations which explained that the universe is continuosly expanding is all a hypothesis. so shall we ask the government to stop invseting billions of dollars of tax payer's money in these reaserches which probably are 'NOT' going to help human beings for a few centuries? and if the government doesnot agree shall we stop
paying our taxes?

scientist ask astrologer to prove their 'belief'. they appoint an astrologer then when he goes wrong they say that astrology is crap. well just for the ignorant fools who accept what these scientists have said, an astrologer is like an engineer 'applying his science'. if physics has been wrongly thought or wrongly understood by him he would obviouls fail in its application. does that mean physics itself is wrong???

obviously the scientist involved in such arguments are smart enough to know all this but have smartly and systematically made the layman think astrology is all crap.

maybe they know that if they alone can use it they will end up controlling people. no matter how much intellectual a person gets. his/her desire to control and manipulate others never dies. selfishness is in our genes. history is proof. from the time of the first ape resorting to cannibalism to manarchs, dicatators and now even federal presidents.

posted February 04, 2006 08:23 AM              

G=m1*m2/d^2

and for the atom,rutherfords scattering ray experiment showed the existance of atoms...They calculated the radius from that experiment....

And there is proof that the universe is expanding,It's called the doppler effect..

The frequency of the wave increases as the distance decreases between two moving objects,And the frequency decreases as the objects go further away from each other...

After observing light from the various other galaxy;s and stars,I has been found out that the galaxy's are all moving away,try googling blue shift and red shift...

posted February 04, 2006 08:37 AM            

"2.there is no 'mathematical' proof to the existance of atom. it has also never been 'seen'. it is widly accepted because everything is 'believed' to be composed of matter. shall we conclude that as there is no 'mathematical' proof it is just another 'co-incidence'???"

Evolution, I'm a little confused by this statement? Could you expand a little please?

I agree with Hotice, I do not dispute the intention of your post, just the facts (hopefully I misintepreted them wrong).
Science can be a bad guy with his cynicism and sceptical eye, but ultimately science is important for helping actually PROVE astrology, and there is evidence exisiting that points towards this proof already (written about in a recent thread).