Author
|
Topic: Orb "attenuation"
|
jkxx unregistered
|
posted April 05, 2006 02:52 PM
Hi everyone,this is just an odd question that's been boggling my mind lately. When looking at inexact aspects within orb, do you use a linear, logarithmic, or some other system to figure out the relative strength of the aspect? I've felt that it's more logarithmic and have been using this formula on my site and just for trying to compare aspects (the 'squish exponent' is more or less arbitrary) as it feels more right than just dividing. Anyone ever wonder about this? If you know of any non-standard orb derivation systems and wish to share, that'll be appreciated as well. IP: Logged |
astro junkie unregistered
|
posted April 14, 2006 11:31 PM
I'm fascinated by what you're saying, but would love it if you can break it down for me ... I'm sort of following it.------------------ ... it's better to light a candle than curse the darkness IP: Logged |
Happy Dragon unregistered
|
posted April 15, 2006 12:36 PM
giving that a few minutes thought .. I'd go for logarithmic ..IP: Logged |
breakfast on pluto unregistered
|
posted April 15, 2006 12:54 PM
hey;is it 3/2 or 3.2 .. in quantum chem it looks like 3/2 and again derivaiton... IP: Logged |
astro junkie unregistered
|
posted April 20, 2006 10:16 PM
... *raising my hand* ...IP: Logged |
astro junkie unregistered
|
posted April 22, 2006 02:44 PM
... I wish I understood all this cuz it really does look interesting ... ah ... maybe one day it will make another pass ...------------------ ... it's better to light a candle than curse the darkness IP: Logged |