Author
|
Topic: Composites- do they always work? (Tim please, IQ, anyone??)
|
alanabelle86 Knowflake Posts: 40 From: Somewhere over the rainbow Registered: May 2009
|
posted May 29, 2006 08:01 AM
I personally usually use Davison charts more than Composites. However, I have a question... I know both shows the "relationship" itself as if it were a third entity. But wouldn't the day the relationship actually started be just as significant? Kind of like a "birth chart"?
------------------ Libra Rising, Scorpio Sun, Leo Moon IP: Logged |
Lady Macbeth unregistered
|
posted May 29, 2006 10:26 AM
http://www.cafeastrology.com/relationshiptimingastrology.html This may help you a bit.
IP: Logged |
Ingrid unregistered
|
posted May 29, 2006 12:22 PM
Interesting... I was checking that link and it talks about a couple who met in Internet, it saysthat: when couples meet online, the date, time, and place of meeting in person is much more significant. what do you reckon about couples who were friends first, we should made the chart based on the very first meeting or the day of the first "proper" date? any opinions? thank you!IP: Logged |
alanabelle86 Knowflake Posts: 40 From: Somewhere over the rainbow Registered: May 2009
|
posted May 29, 2006 08:08 PM
My Sag and I were friends before we started dating. I did a composite, a Davison and I did a chart for the first day we "kissed" (we pretty much denoted that as the day our relationship began.I found the Davison to be most accurate in terms of how our relationship "works" aside from how we feel about it..the composite was more like the general feel of the relationship overall...and it seems like the day we first kissed (our anniversary) correlates to our general purpose and path with one another... it's interesting, to say the least, and there are very interesting aspects between the three charts....
IP: Logged |
wilsontc unregistered
|
posted May 30, 2006 01:30 AM
alanabelle,The "kiss" chart is an event chart, dating from the birth of the relationship. Agreeing, Tim IP: Logged | |