Author
|
Topic: Pluto orbs.....tight orbs
|
eatbooks unregistered
|
posted February 02, 2007 07:26 AM
When they demoted Pluto, it was really hard for me to let it go completely...so now I only use tight orbs(2-4 unless its conj) anything more than that i dont think works...how about you guys? are you still using the regular orbs? IP: Logged |
Gemini Nymph unregistered
|
posted February 02, 2007 11:43 AM
Yes I still use the same orbs. Pluto only got demoted in name. I have Pluto rising at 11-12 degrees from my ASC. However i have many traits of someone with a Pluto conjunct ASC. I don't doubt Pluto's presence. I believe it fills a specific niche, and thus has its own unique presence. Plus I've been going to some hellish Pluto transits for the past gazillion years - don't give me any crap about how Pluto's now somehow less influential just because a damn commitee changed its classification!!! IP: Logged |
Salisa unregistered
|
posted February 02, 2007 01:07 PM
what are regular orbs for pluto? Are the natal orbs different from how you use them in synastry?------------------ I ask for so little just let me rule you. And you can have everything that you want Just fear me, love me, do as I say and I will be you slave. ~Jareth the Goblin King, Labrynth IP: Logged |
william unregistered
|
posted February 02, 2007 01:34 PM
gemini nymph i agree 100 % williamIP: Logged |
libraschoice7 Knowflake Posts: 174 From: the city so nice they named it twice! Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted February 02, 2007 01:38 PM
Your right GN, it's the same as someone setting something on fire and then telling you to turn your back and ignore it because 'it's not that bad' it's less severe because a certain group of people say so. It's still there and has it's effect and impact just the same...------------------ Sun in Libra Moon in Cancer Jupiter in Cancer Venus in Virgo Mars in Cancer Ascendant in Cancer I "FEEL" therefor I am IP: Logged |
Gemini Nymph unregistered
|
posted February 02, 2007 01:50 PM
The regular orbs for Puto have been what the rbs have been for the other planets, except maybe the luminaries (although not everyone uses wider orbs for luminaries). It depends on what orbs you prefer to use. Some people use pretty generous orbs, others not so much.Some variations of orbs as I've observed: Conjunction: 5-10 degrees Trine: 3-7 degrees Sextile: 2-5 degrees Square: 3-7 degrees Opposition: 3-10 Myself, as a guiding rule (with exceptionwhen deemed necessary): Conjunction: 8 degrees Trine: 5 degrees Sextiles: 3 degrees Squares: 5 degrees Oppositions: 8 degrees I usually allow a wider orb (+2) when one of the planets is a luminary, a singleton, chart ruler or is stationary. A couple of other thoughts about orbs for Pluto: - Pluto probably ought to be thought more as a binary body because its satellite is nearly the same size. Also Pluto and Charon are in complimentary orbit around *each other* rather simply Charon orbiting around Pluto (techincally it's called "rotation" and they both keep the same face toward each other, like two dancers in a waltz) - this suggests that neither is the "dominant" but a case of two bodies so intertwined they represent one energy. If thought as a binary body, this could explain some of the oddities with Pluto, as well as it's unique intensity (since it's the only binary body in our solar system we know of). Furhermore, the myth of Pluto does also presents a duality, through transformation, of death and rebirth, which can be seen as represented by the binary Pluto-Charon body. - Pluto's "demotion" was based largely on it not having it's own orbit (it crosses Neptune's orbit at certain points). At certain points of its orbit when it crosses Neptune's orbit, Pluto is actually closer to the Sun than Neptune. Ina strtology I thin this is significant - see it as Pluto's way of "weaving" itself into our solar system, again in its own unique way. Suffice to say (again) Pluto is unique, and astrology, being far more of an intuitive science than anstronomy, is much more sensitive to the very real impact such a unique energy can have. IP: Logged |
Gemini Nymph unregistered
|
posted February 02, 2007 02:04 PM
BTW, the whole topic of "Dwarf planets" and similar bodies brings up the debate of how to bodies like Chiron and Ceres. Personally, I still see Chiron as an asteriod, albeit one of the most, if not THE most significant one for astrology. But it, unlike Pluto, isn't a represention of unique energy in my opinion - it's an expansion or higher vibration of energies already dominant in the major planets (the "archtypes"), chiefly the Moon, Mercury and Jupiter. I am very comfortable with seeing it as a "higher moon" that possesses both the personal dimensions of the Moon and the universal dimensions of Jupiter. Chiron also has the earthy Virgoan-Mercurial side that represents a social dimension. But suffice tp say, Chiron isn't the dominant/archtypal representation of these energies, so it's still "minor" even if very infleuntial. I make the same case with Ceres. It's energies are a variation on a combination Moon-Venus theme, and those isn't unique, but an expansion of dominant energy chiefly represented but the more dominant bodies/archtypes of the Moon and Venus. IP: Logged |
william unregistered
|
posted February 02, 2007 04:15 PM
gemini nymph, i disagree with you on this one.just the physical characteristic of chiron are so singular that it is a independent force. it ia not a asteroid as its orbit is between saturn and uranus.it actually passes inside saturns orbit and very nearly passes inside uranus's orbit.this eccentric orbit indicates that it is a "recent" member of the solar system,the number given is less that 2 million years.it also has a tail which paradoxically does not point away from the sun as most comets do.yet is far more massive than any comet.as for its influence,i find it a combination of its two nearest neighbors,saturn and uranus.it seems to show the malefic nature of saturn and the awareness of uranus,it seems to be a point where paradoxes can be resolved or violent confrontations can explode.1t could be seen as a focal point of two existing vibrations,but it effect is singular. willaimIP: Logged | |