Lindaland
  Astrology
  Pluto orbs.....tight orbs

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Pluto orbs.....tight orbs
eatbooks
unregistered
posted February 02, 2007 07:26 AM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
When they demoted Pluto, it was really hard for me to let it go completely...so now I only use tight orbs(2-4 unless its conj) anything more than that i dont think works...

how about you guys? are you still using the regular orbs?

IP: Logged

Gemini Nymph
unregistered
posted February 02, 2007 11:43 AM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Yes I still use the same orbs. Pluto only got demoted in name.

I have Pluto rising at 11-12 degrees from my ASC. However i have many traits of someone with a Pluto conjunct ASC. I don't doubt Pluto's presence. I believe it fills a specific niche, and thus has its own unique presence.

Plus I've been going to some hellish Pluto transits for the past gazillion years - don't give me any crap about how Pluto's now somehow less influential just because a damn commitee changed its classification!!!

IP: Logged

Salisa
unregistered
posted February 02, 2007 01:07 PM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
what are regular orbs for pluto? Are the natal orbs different from how you use them in synastry?

------------------
I ask for so little just let me rule you.
And you can have everything that you want
Just fear me, love me, do as I say and I will be you slave. ~Jareth the Goblin King, Labrynth

IP: Logged

william
unregistered
posted February 02, 2007 01:34 PM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
gemini nymph i agree 100 %
william

IP: Logged

libraschoice7
Knowflake

Posts: 174
From: the city so nice they named it twice!
Registered: Apr 2009

posted February 02, 2007 01:38 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for libraschoice7     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Your right GN, it's the same as someone setting something on fire and then telling you to turn your back and ignore it because 'it's not that bad' it's less severe because a certain group of people say so. It's still there and has it's effect and impact just the same...

------------------
Sun in Libra
Moon in Cancer
Jupiter in Cancer
Venus in Virgo
Mars in Cancer
Ascendant in Cancer

I "FEEL" therefor I am

IP: Logged

Gemini Nymph
unregistered
posted February 02, 2007 01:50 PM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
The regular orbs for Puto have been what the rbs have been for the other planets, except maybe the luminaries (although not everyone uses wider orbs for luminaries). It depends on what orbs you prefer to use. Some people use pretty generous orbs, others not so much.

Some variations of orbs as I've observed:

Conjunction: 5-10 degrees
Trine: 3-7 degrees
Sextile: 2-5 degrees
Square: 3-7 degrees
Opposition: 3-10

Myself, as a guiding rule (with exceptionwhen deemed necessary):

Conjunction: 8 degrees
Trine: 5 degrees
Sextiles: 3 degrees
Squares: 5 degrees
Oppositions: 8 degrees

I usually allow a wider orb (+2) when one of the planets is a luminary, a singleton, chart ruler or is stationary.

A couple of other thoughts about orbs for Pluto:

- Pluto probably ought to be thought more as a binary body because its satellite is nearly the same size. Also Pluto and Charon are in complimentary orbit around *each other* rather simply Charon orbiting around Pluto (techincally it's called "rotation" and they both keep the same face toward each other, like two dancers in a waltz) - this suggests that neither is the "dominant" but a case of two bodies so intertwined they represent one energy.

If thought as a binary body, this could explain some of the oddities with Pluto, as well as it's unique intensity (since it's the only binary body in our solar system we know of). Furhermore, the myth of Pluto does also presents a duality, through transformation, of death and rebirth, which can be seen as represented by the binary Pluto-Charon body.

- Pluto's "demotion" was based largely on it not having it's own orbit (it crosses Neptune's orbit at certain points). At certain points of its orbit when it crosses Neptune's orbit, Pluto is actually closer to the Sun than Neptune. Ina strtology I thin this is significant - see it as Pluto's way of "weaving" itself into our solar system, again in its own unique way.

Suffice to say (again) Pluto is unique, and astrology, being far more of an intuitive science than anstronomy, is much more sensitive to the very real impact such a unique energy can have.

IP: Logged

Gemini Nymph
unregistered
posted February 02, 2007 02:04 PM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
BTW, the whole topic of "Dwarf planets" and similar bodies brings up the debate of how to bodies like Chiron and Ceres.

Personally, I still see Chiron as an asteriod, albeit one of the most, if not THE most significant one for astrology. But it, unlike Pluto, isn't a represention of unique energy in my opinion - it's an expansion or higher vibration of energies already dominant in the major planets (the "archtypes"), chiefly the Moon, Mercury and Jupiter. I am very comfortable with seeing it as a "higher moon" that possesses both the personal dimensions of the Moon and the universal dimensions of Jupiter. Chiron also has the earthy Virgoan-Mercurial side that represents a social dimension. But suffice tp say, Chiron isn't the dominant/archtypal representation of these energies, so it's still "minor" even if very infleuntial.

I make the same case with Ceres. It's energies are a variation on a combination Moon-Venus theme, and those isn't unique, but an expansion of dominant energy chiefly represented but the more dominant bodies/archtypes of the Moon and Venus.

IP: Logged

william
unregistered
posted February 02, 2007 04:15 PM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
gemini nymph,
i disagree with you on this one.just the physical characteristic of chiron are so singular that it is a independent force.
it ia not a asteroid as its orbit is between saturn and uranus.it actually passes inside saturns orbit and very nearly passes inside uranus's orbit.this eccentric orbit indicates that it is a "recent" member of the solar system,the number given is less that 2 million years.it also has a tail which paradoxically does not point away from the sun as most comets do.yet is far more massive than any comet.as for its influence,i find it a combination of its two nearest neighbors,saturn and uranus.it seems to show the malefic nature of saturn and the awareness of uranus,it seems to be a point where paradoxes can be resolved or violent confrontations can explode.1t could be seen as a focal point of two existing vibrations,but it effect is singular.
willaim

IP: Logged

All times are Eastern Standard Time

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | Linda-Goodman.com

Copyright © 2011

Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.46a