|
Author
|
Topic: Aspects
|
MUSTANG
unregistered
|
posted August 31, 2007 11:32 PM
 
Which do you place more emphasis on when checking out natal transits: Aspects or the aspects-natal transits? Why?I usually pay more attention to the aspects-natal transits, but lately I'm wondering if I should pay more attention to the regular aspects. I generally ignore them, because I feel they aren't important. That's probably not too wise...huh? (If I'm being unclear, you can see what I mean by going to astro.com and doing your natal chart and transits, and then viewing the additional tables. Then, it's on the 2nd page of that.) ------------------
Sun Aqua, Moon Sagg, Asc Taurus IP: Logged |
Venus De Milo
Knowflake Posts: 167
From:
Registered: Jul 2009
|
posted September 02, 2007 07:15 AM
I think they're all important. I pay the most attention to what is exact or coming into aspect. If the planets are moving away from each other, that's an influence that is dissipating in power day by day, so unless they're two really slow moving outer planets, I tend not to pay as much attention as I tend to think the pinnacle of it's influence has already passed. IP: Logged |
MUSTANG
unregistered
|
posted September 02, 2007 10:16 PM
I do the same thing regarding the separating aspects. I don't even pay attention to them anymore. I still don't know which are more important - your natal "whatever" to your transiting "whatever" or the flat aspects table. Actually, does anyone know what the difference is? Am I even making sense? IP: Logged | |
Lindaland
UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! 
