posted September 13, 2007 06:10 PM            

There were threads that compares midpoint Composite method with Davison method. Personally, I'm more used to Composite, as it makes more sense (for me) coz it resembles the balance between the energy of each pair of planets. It's more physical (yet, there seems to be a small flaw); yet Davison, using the time and space midpoint method, seem to hold a sense of "destiny" (but, this type of midpoint still doesn't make much sense for me).

Well, I knew an astrologer that is really great and accurate at interpreting composite charts.. His way of reading is intuitive and insightful, unlike the normal interpretations that we can usually find on the net. ^_^ So it actually depends on how you read the information that can be found in the symbolism of each method..