Author
|
Topic: What is REALLY important in synastry?
|
darkdreamer unregistered
|
posted December 21, 2007 06:55 AM
Hi all,I know we love to explore every single corner of synastric connections. But today I want to know what do you think are the real important things? The foundation of any kind of synastry? What do you look for first and foremost? DD IP: Logged |
SagSun unregistered
|
posted December 21, 2007 11:34 AM
Interesting topic darkdreamer!!! The things I think are most important for any (romantic) relationship: *A's Sun favorably aspecting B's Venus *A's Moon favorably aspecting B's Sun OR Ascendant *A's Venus favorably aspecting B's Mars *A's Venus favorably aspecting B's Moon *A's Ascendant/Descendant favorably aspecting B's Sun, Moon, Venus, Mars or North Node (with the conjunction being the strongest aspect of course) *Venus/Pluto double-whammies (it can't get any more intense) *A's Venus favorably aspecting B's Chiron *A's Mercury favorably aspecting B's Mercury Asepcts I usually watch out for: *A's Sun square/opposition B's Saturn *A's Moon square B's Moon *A's Moon square B's Mars *A's Moon square B's Saturn *A's Moon square/conjunct/opposition B's Neptune (nice at first, but painful once you take off the rose-colored glasses) *A's Venus square B's Saturn *A's Mars square B's Mars *A's Mars square B's Saturn Of course, every relationship has a number of "bad" aspects as well. But as long as there are enough strong positive aspects to balance things out I don't see a problem with having those "bad" aspects in synastry. If on the other hand a couple has (almost) all of those aspects with no or very few positive aspects that's when I am basically starting to count the days until they break up. Basically, it all comes down to one thing ... you gotta have the right balance of emotional understanding and sexual attraction. IP: Logged |
26taurus unregistered
|
posted December 21, 2007 11:44 AM
For some reason I always pay close attention to the conjunctions mainly and oppositions. In synastry, transits, progressions etc. They can go either way.Too many "easy" aspects in synastry can make for a boring relationship. Squares tend to give some spice. Of course it's nice to have a good balance of both "easy" and "hard" aspects. IP: Logged |
funnyface unregistered
|
posted December 21, 2007 12:21 PM
What are " favourable aspects" in synastry?IP: Logged |
girlloveboy unregistered
|
posted December 21, 2007 01:36 PM
Hi, DDBased on what i learned/heared - the 1st step should be to check the natals of the persons, see the current transits, progressions etc, plus to see how much they fit into each others horoscope (if its a romantic relationship, then check the 5th and 7th house, its rules, and the planets in it) -where each others Asc,MC,Sun and Moon falls can show the aim of the relationship (usually if at least 2 of them falls in the 8th house of the other persons, then its not a good indication for a long term relationship) In a long term relationship i consider a positive Sun-Moon aspect to be a very important one -main aspects to the others Asc is significant as well -2 or more personal planets falling in the other persons 12th house, indicate karmic depts, what the house person have to pay back this life - check the compatibility of Asc, Sun and Moon, and not just like ASC to Asc, but, ASC to Sun, ASc to Moon..etc (stressful aspects between each others Moon is maybe the hardest to handle) -for romantic relationship check Venus, Mars, Pluto, the 5th and 8th house rulers aspects to each others, the planets in these two houses -for a long term relationship a main, positive aspect is VERY important between two persons Mercuries -Saturn aspects for stability, and i personally see Saturn-SAturn aspect as well very important, not just Saturn to personal planets And i also think a heavy Saturn aspect, like SAturn square the others Moon, is not neccessarily a bad one, if there are other easy aspects to balance it And many says Moon-SAturn is one of the most karmic aspects in synastry -of course, play much attention to the Nodes, both South and North Node Though i would only look for the conjunctions or squares between ones Node and planets -one persons planets conjunct the other persons IC or the ruler of its 4th house could indicate past life connection as well (like the South Node) with a possibility of a past family connection -then look for the aspects between ones Uranus, Neptun, Pluto and the others personal planets -check the midpoints, Sun-Moon, personal planets-Saturn or mainly anything -check the paralels for the declinations, its said its as powerful as a conjunction About contraparalels i heard different theoris, whether is like a less effectful conjunction or an opposition, i dont know -check Chiron, i consider it as a very important planet, it can tell so much about the past life wounds -i would use other bodies like Vertex and Juno for sure. Vertex shows fated connection if it makes strong aspect to the other persons Asc, Sun, or Moon While Juno shows our ideal long term partner and its aspect to Jupiter for example can indicate an unbreakable connection (based on mythology) -then you can look at the composite or Davison, I think if a synastry lack of, lets say SAturn aspects, but in the composite you find a strong one, then i consider it to be important These are my main points edited: -i would use 2-3 degree orbs (for conjunctions it can be up to 5 degree, especially if ASc,Sun or Moon is one of them -for paralels only 1.2 orb -in my view opoosition is not neccessarily a bad aspect, for example Sun opposite the others Moon is quite a positive one -i consider quincunx as a hard but karmic aspect
IP: Logged |
CoralFrequency Newflake Posts: 0 From: Registered: Aug 2009
|
posted December 21, 2007 01:49 PM
Serious relationship:Sun/Sun (trine, sextile, opposition, square) Moon/Moon (trine, conjunction) Sun/Moon (trine, conjunction, opposition) Moon/Saturn (trine, sextile) Sun/Saturn (trine, sextile, opposition) Sun/Asc (conjunction, opposition) Moon/Asc (conj, opp) Asc/Asc (conjunction) Sexual attraction: Venus/Mars (all aspects) Venus/Pluto - same Mars/Pluto - same Moon/Mars (conjunction, trine) Moon/Pluto (conjunction, opposition, trine) Sun/Venus or Mars - all Asc/Venus (conjunction, opposition) Asc/Mars (conjunction, opposition) Asc/Pluto (conj, opp) Sun/Pluto (all aspects) For friendship and good communication: - easy aspects (trine/sextile/conjunction) between: Sun/Sun Moon/Moon Sun/Mercury Moon/Venus Moon/Mercury Mercury/Mercury Venus/Venus Mercury/Jupiter - any Uranus and Jupiter conjunctions/trines/sextiles to his/her personal planets I think it's important to have a at least a few aspects at Sun/Moon/Asc/Saturn level.. and some at friendship level - specially Mercury ones.. to make something work. The sexual aspects are important but fizzle out if there isn't much substance elsewhere. IP: Logged |
CoralFrequency Newflake Posts: 0 From: Registered: Aug 2009
|
posted December 21, 2007 01:50 PM
girlloveboy.. I forgot to mention the nodes IP: Logged |
blue moon Knowflake Posts: 1344 From: U.K Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted December 21, 2007 02:14 PM
Depends what kind of relationship and what I'm looking at it for. Most of the time I'd just be fiddling around seeing what works where, and trying to learn the craft, as it were. Overall I'd look out for: * Any close aspects * Any planets hitting sensitive spots like major configurations. * Any patterns the two charts if placed on top of each other. (i.e two T-Squares making a Grand Cross) If you are talking about romantic/sexual relationships and particular aspects I'd be looking out for hard Venus/Mars aspects. IP: Logged |
funnyface unregistered
|
posted December 21, 2007 03:26 PM
What hard aspects of Venus/Mars are best for Synastry? What other aspects are equally important? Do you look at natal or progressed charts?IP: Logged |
lalalinda Moderator Posts: 1120 From: nevada Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted December 21, 2007 03:32 PM
Ascendant/Descendant aspects, especially the conjunction.Aspects to the Ruler of the Ascendant When you can't understand why you get along so well because planetary aspects are just so-so. Look to the above. Out! IP: Logged |
blue moon Knowflake Posts: 1344 From: U.K Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted December 21, 2007 05:09 PM
That has reminded me of an interesting article on progressed synastry in the International Journal of the Astrological Association in Great Britain. I dug it out (well, got it off the shelf where it was in chronological order, lol), Vol 48, issue 5. September/October 2006.The author has put some of the info up on his website: http://www.positiveastrology.com/ It's under "current articles" - aspects in relationships. He has done quite a lot of research on progressed aspects in synastry. IP: Logged |
SagSun unregistered
|
posted December 22, 2007 06:01 AM
Just wondering ... how much emphasis do you guys place on declinations, Davison and composite charts??? I usually take a closer look at declinations after analyzing the basic synastry. I think parallels and contraparallels can make up for contacts missing in the basic synastry or further intensify contacts. After that I look at the Davison chart, which I find to be a lot more accurate than the composite. I place a lot of emphasis on chart patterns involving the Sun, Moon, Venus, Mars and Saturn (especially the grand trine and the kite). Only after that I look at the composite chart but I don't really pay that much attention to it. I basically only look whether the chart is scattered or whether the planets are concentrated in 2-3 houses.
IP: Logged |
Cha unregistered
|
posted December 22, 2007 09:19 AM
Great thread but does anyone know if a person's North Node and Jupiter conjuncts another person's 7th house.What does that mean?IP: Logged |
hippichick Knowflake Posts: 588 From: Registered: May 2009
|
posted December 22, 2007 09:20 AM
From what I have found, any combination that lends itself to compatible suns or suns/moons or moons just adds comfort and ease in the relationship.A very basic rule of thumb is the sun/moon contacts. Jupiter contacts add benevolance. IP: Logged |
SagSun unregistered
|
posted December 22, 2007 11:31 AM
quote: ...any combination that lends itself to compatible suns or suns/moons or moons just adds comfort and ease in the relationship.
I have to disagree a little. Sun/Sun, Sun/Moon and Moon/Moon connections are not the non-plus-ultra for relationships. You always have to see the big picture. For instance, if someone has a Leo Sun but the rest of his chart is all, say, water, he or she will have a hard time getting along with someone with an Aries Moon. Now don't get me wrong ... like I stated in my first post I definitely think that easy Sun/Moon contacts are good for a relationship. But if someone has an Ascendant that is incompatible to the other person's Sun or Moon there won't be much comfort. I have seen plenty of cases where the partners' Suns and/or Moons were incompatible by traditional standards but contacts made to the Ascendant were strong ... and all of those relationships were more or less long-term. Seriously, a perfect Sun/Moon trine won't help your relationship much when the presence of the other person makes you feel intimidated. I know that most people won't agree with me on this one. But I prefer a tight Sun/Ascendant or Moon/Ascendant conjunction over a Sun/Moon trine any time. IP: Logged |
augentier unregistered
|
posted December 22, 2007 12:37 PM
Will have to agree with SagSun on that ^ ... generally speaking, my friend's Sun (cancer) should not see eye to eye with my moon (sagittarius) .. but my asc. is Scorpio and his moon is in Scorpio...the interaction between us is not at all uncomfortable or intimidating, despite the difficult sun-moon aspect.------------------ Capricorn sun / Scorpio rising / Sagittarius moon No man is free who is not master of himself. IP: Logged |
hippichick Knowflake Posts: 588 From: Registered: May 2009
|
posted December 22, 2007 12:42 PM
SSBut there is always an inherant "comfort" with the individual. I never, and I do mean NEVER write anything on this forum that is not of my own personal observation. Once or twice I have quoted Liz Greene and maybe Arroyo in the distant past, but only to support what I have noticed regarding astrology. Again, from what I have witnessed in many years of studying my own chart and the charts of others, sun/moon connections just make for something very comforting. Everything else in the synastry can be crap and if the sun/moon connections are "compatible" then there is atleast a basis to work on. Having said that, my "soul" mate and I do not have any sun/moon favorible contacts, however he is as Piscean as I am Aquarian, me being a Pisces sun and he an Aqua...now surely we do connect on many levels and always will...but since our first meeting, there was always this feeling of un-ease. Others I have connected to, including my daughters and my immediate family members all have the a sun/moon thing going on and I have noted that there is always comfort and ease within the relation. Synastry is such a trickey thing. Astrology is so complex anyway, dealing with the human condition, but when you blend the energies of two humans....it becomes even more complex!!! I have found in my experience one would be good to look at the basic elemental compatabilities as a VERY basic start. IP: Logged |
CoralFrequency Newflake Posts: 0 From: Registered: Aug 2009
|
posted December 22, 2007 01:05 PM
SagSun, I think it is important to have a Sun/Moon (Moon/Moon or Sun/Sun) contact or a few, but they don't have to be easy aspects. Any major aspect is better than none at all.. ie a Virgo/Pisces with a Leo/Libra. The ascendant can help but at the end of the day, I don't think the relationship would stand a good chance at being long lasting. Marriages I've looked at, have at least 1 hard aspect at Sun/Moon level - conjunction/opposition or square. My mum and step dad have the square for instance, but it doesn't cause much strife.Looking back on serious relationships you should technically find at least one Sun/Moon, Sun/Sun or Moon/Moon contact. I have a Sun/Moon square in natal.. so if someone's Moon is conjunct my Sun it also squares my Moon.. and if someone's Sun is conjunct my Moon it squares my Sun..but so far I've gotten along with both of those placements ie. Aries Moon and Cap Sun. IP: Logged |
Lara unregistered
|
posted December 22, 2007 04:33 PM
Does it have to be all of these "great aspects" and do they have to be double whammy's please?Synastry is such a rollercoaster lol IP: Logged |
SagSun unregistered
|
posted December 22, 2007 06:21 PM
@augentier I have seen similar connections working out in my own life ... I have a Sag Sun with a Leo Moon. My SO has a Cap Sun with a Pisces Moon. According to the traditional interpretations we should feel VERY uncomfortable when we are together. But he has his Sag Ascendant exactly conjunct my Sun and trine my Moon and my Pisces Ascendant tightly conjuncts his Moon ... long story short, I've never felt more comfortable with anyone else before. @hippichick May I ask you what exactly you are insinuating??? I respect other people's opinions but I expect others to do the same thing. I never said that you were writing about stuff that you have not actually seen in real life. But the same thing holds true for me. Just like you I was talking about my own personal experience. I've seen several long-term relationships (meaning they are married for 30+ years) where the partners didn't have ANY contact between their Sun/Moon or Moon/Moon or Sun/Sun (they only had parallels and contraparallels). However, I've seen several cases where the partners had a Sun/Sun semisextile (which as far as I know does not count as a favorable aspect by traditional interpretations). Synastry is about seeing the big picture. Those Sun/Moon (and Sun/Sun and Moon/Moon) theories are basically generalizations that pretty much disregard the natal chart of a person. But as you surely know people are more than just their Sun (and Moon) sign. There are so many more things to consider. @CoralFrequency I see the Ascendant as an essential part of our personality. It's not something we leave at the front door. And since the Ascendant moves 360 degrees every day I think contacts made to the Ascendant are much more important than simple Sun/Moon connections. I'm not saying that one should disregard Sun/Moon connections all together. But like I said, if you don't feel comfortable in the presence of the other person you will not get to know them on a deeper level in the first place. Also, as we all know the Ascendant determines the Descendant which basically indicates what type of person we are attracted to. But if your Ascendant/Descendant is not in sync with your Sun/Moon your "perfect" mate as indicated by the Descendant won't see eye to eye with your Sun. I think I can best explain what I'm trying to say with an example ... I am a Sag Sun with a Leo Moon and Pisces rising. According to traditional interpretations my perfect mate would have either a Sag, Aries, Leo, Libra, Gemini or Aquarius Sun/Moon. Now, I do like Libras and Sags and sometimes also Aquarius (but I guess that makes sense because I have a Sag stellium and a Libra Venus & Mars). But as a Pisces rising I feel VERY uncomfortable and intimidated in the presence of Leos and particularly Aries, and Geminis kind of irritate me. My Virgo Descendant on the other hand indicates an attraction to Virgos. However, a Virgo Sun or Moon might be square my Sun. You wanna know what sign was most dominant in the people I've been close to so far? It was Virgo ... which according to the Sun/Moon theory shouldn't work out. But "surprisingly" I feel more comfortable in the presence of Virgos. So much for the theory... IP: Logged |
CoralFrequency Newflake Posts: 0 From: Registered: Aug 2009
|
posted December 22, 2007 06:49 PM
That's a 'so much for the theory' assuming only traditionally positive aspects count - like conjunction/trine/sextile.Like I said, in my opinion squares (and oppositions) are important as well. Your Sun squares a Virgo Sun.. It also squares a Virgo Moon by sign - so the aspect (Sun/Sun or Sun/Moon) is there. quote: It was Virgo ... which according to the Sun/Moon theory shouldn't work out. But "surprisingly" I feel more comfortable in the presence of Virgos. So much for the theory...
That version of the theory is bull, I agree with you. Like I said, my mum's Sun (Leo) squares my step dad's Moon (Taurus) by the degree.. They've been together happily for years. I don't think *all* astrologers who talk about the Sun/Moon theory refer to "good" aspects only. I'm sure I've read that any of the strong aspects - conjunction/opposition/square - are better for a long term relationship - rather than having none (like having just a sextile for example, or no major aspects at all) The Ascendant is very important as well. You're right about that. :edit: I only just read this part: quote: 've seen several long-term relationships (meaning they are married for 30+ years) where the partners didn't have ANY contact between their Sun/Moon or Moon/Moon or Sun/Sun (they only had parallels and contraparallels). However, I've seen several cases where the partners had a Sun/Sun semisextile (which as far as I know does not count as a favorable aspect by traditional interpretations).
I'm not surprised about the semi-sextile thing, because I actually mentioned on another thread that almost all the marriages in my family or family friends and people I know of - have semi-sextile Suns. For some reason it's very very common. I think it's because of Mercury/Venus aspects - because they are always close to the Sun so they often end up in the sign before or after your own Sun sign. That being said, these people still had other Sun/Moon aspects. I don't know any with *no* major Sun/Moon or Moon/Moon - that lasted.. but that's just my experience. Anything can work at the end of the day, if the people involved genuinely want to make it work. IP: Logged |
SagSun unregistered
|
posted December 22, 2007 07:16 PM
quote: ...in my opinion squares (and oppositions) are important as well. ... ...I don't think *all* astrologers who talk about the Sun/Moon theory refer to "good" aspects only.
Agreed ... However, I still think that a Moon/Ascendant conjunction or a Sun/Ascendant conjunction is better for a long-term relationship than a Moon/Moon or Sun/Moon square (of course, I am generalizing things here ... because like I said the entire charts of both people need to be taken into consideration). Anyway, what I was basically trying to say is that one should NEVER disregard aspects between the Sun or the Moon and the Ascendant. Sun/Ascendant and Moon/Ascendant contacts are just as important as Sun/Sun, Sun/Moon and Moon/Moon contacts. I simply feel that it is an over-generalization to say that without a Sun/Moon contact you can't have a long-term relationship with someone. But that's just IMHO... *edit* quote: That being said, these people still had other Sun/Moon aspects. I don't know any with *no* major Sun/Moon or Moon/Moon - that lasted.. but that's just my experience.
My grandparents were married for over 50 years. They had NO aspect between their Suns and Moons ... not even a minor one or one by declinations. But we all have our own experiences ... and I guess nobody is more right than everyone else . IP: Logged |
darkdreamer unregistered
|
posted December 23, 2007 06:14 AM
Thank you all for your replies, and for that fruitful discussion on Sun and Moon and ASC. My opinion on this is that I think Sun, Moon, ASC could maybe called the "foundation" of ones personality. And the other person "should" be in tune to this basic personality. I do think that a Sun-Moon-aspect indicates that people can relate to each other, but I would never disregard the ASC-aspects. The ASC is maybe the most personal point in the chart (along with the IC btw - maybe we should look at the IC, too). Let me give you an example: She: Sun: Sagittarius Moon: Aquarius AC: Sagittarius IC: Aries ASC-ruler: Pisces ICruler: Sagittarius He: Sun: Capricorn (00°) Moon: Aries ASC: Aries IC: Cancer ASCruler: Libra ICruler: Aries synastric aspects between Sun, Moon, ASC, IC: His Sun conjunct her Sun His Moon trine her Sun His ASC trine her Sun his IC trine her ASC-ruler his ASCruler opposite her IC (4°) his ICruler trine her Sun I guess, these would be the "Basics", wouldn`t they? Looking further I now would look to the Sun, Moon, ASC, IC-connections to the other planets? Like: His Venus sextile her AC-ruler his Mars opposite her IC (4°) His Jupiter trine her IC His Jupiter trine her IC-ruler His Jupiter trine her AC (4) HIs Saturn square her Sun Her Venus very widely conjunct his Sun (almost 6°) - but his Sun/Venus-mp conjuncts her Venus and her Sun/Venus-mp conjuncts his Sun AND additionally his Sun is parallel her Venus and his Venus is parallel her Sun - does that qualify as a Sun-Venus-aspect? Her Venus squares his IC-ruler Her Jupiter trines his IC Her Saturn conjuncts his IC And the generational ones: His Uranus squares her Sun HIs Pluto widely squares her Sun (with a bit over 5°) Her Uranus sextiles his Sun Her Uranus opposite his Moon Her Uranus conjuncts his Neptune Her Neptune sextiles his ASC-ruler Her Pluto squares his IC Her Pluto conjuncts his ASC-ruler
So, these would be the connections, that say something about how these personalities "mesh"?
BTW maybe we should also risk a glance at the natals? I just noticed that SHE has Sun in 1st house, and HE has Moon in 1st house. So she would have some Sun in her personality, while he would emanate some lunar traits - wouldn`t that be noteable, too? Also, his Sun squares Uranus, while her Moon is in Aquarius (and her Sun sextiles Uranus) - I think there might be some Uranian vibe in both of them, that could create some sort of "understanding". Probably it would make the synastric dw of Sun-Uranus and the MOon-Uranus-opposition very apparent in their interchange? EDIT: The fact that often there are semisextiles between two Suns could have to do witht he progressed synastry. Often in the progressed synastry they develop into "stronger" aspects like conjunction for example.
IP: Logged |
Diandra23 unregistered
|
posted December 23, 2007 08:10 AM
DD,Me and JOhn are a perfect example of what youve said cause we have our Suns in semisextile (Virgo/Libra). And right now in our progressed sinastry my P sun is conj his Natal Sun;my Moon trines his P AC; his P Venus is conj my P Pluto;his P Sun is conj my P AC ..and these are just some goin on right now Also,we dont have major aspects envolving Sun/Moon in sinastry. We just have a very diffifult one - skuared Moons.
Personnaly i think that the fact that our ACīs are very much interlinked with each otherīs personal planets have much more to do with our strengh as a couple than the Sun/mOON or Moon/Moon aspect ( since i think that the skuared Moons only can make things difficult rather on approaching us) Althougt not exact ones,since the AC moves very fast and as GLB said,up to 5šorb we do have the Sun/AC conjunction; Mercury/AC conjunction; Sun/Venus conjunction in composite;Moon/AC trine and sextile or also the Psyche/AC conjunction. Regarding the Paralells they are big major important factors that gives us clues that arent aparent in regular sinastry: - in ours appears a IC paralell AC (adds very confortable feelings torwards each other,deep ones) - Pluto paralell Venus - IC paralell Mars(Nep/Vertex(0š) and so on.. DD, tHAT analises you did about the generational aspects have indeed much sense.Geberally we would expect that a sun/uranus skuare would "doom" the relationship isnt it?But as you clevered thought,looking at natals,you found a possible vibe of understanding between those uranian energies Yup - i liked that a lot cause as you know me and Jonhy has the uranus/sun skuare also. But like youve said also,JOhn has an Aqua Moon in the 7th(conj his Union),while his Uranus lies in his 5th,conj Mars/Eros and trine his AC His Aqua Moon falls right onto my 5thCusp. In my natal my 5th is ruled bY Uranus,and i have myself quite a Uranian energy goin on too: Uranus skuare Sun/Venus and conj Jup. Our Uranus are naturally conjunct so i think we might also have some sort of a Uranian comprehension torwards each other
IP: Logged |
lovegoblin Knowflake Posts: 27 From: neverland Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted December 23, 2007 10:03 AM
After reading this read i was curious... what if there are no aspect between venus and mars except a mars quendecile venus and a venus quendecile the others ascendant?The other aspects include: m sun trine f moon m venus conjunct f venus f venus sextile m mars f venus trine m pluto m venus conjunct f pluto f mars inconjunct m pluto f moon trine m mars m moon square f mars suns conjunt sun square neptune dw moon trine uranus dw venus square saturn dw f mars opposite m saturn sun and saturns trine dw m pluto conjunct f ascendant f pluto square m ascendant most of her planets fall in his 8th (sun, merc, uranus) would this stand a chance over time?
IP: Logged | |