|
Author
|
Topic: Asto-designer babies
|
Motorgirl
unregistered
|
posted February 18, 2008 08:00 PM
 
There are professional astrologers I know that have scheduled their children's births in such a way so that they would have as ideal a chart as possible within the timeframe available for a healthy birth. Anyone here try that?Me being scientifically and logically inclined have always felt that just like the moon affects water and it creates the shape of the tides, the planets would also influence genetic traits in the water filled womb. Which brings the question... Does the time of birth really matter...or is it more exact time of conception that matters? If we were able to somehow hone the time of conception would natal charts become more obvious in their interpretations? Or is it the first breath of the new born that matters as first breath in most cultures of the past was considered the beginning of life no matter what movements occured in the womb. Thoughts? IP: Logged |
Glaucus
Moderator Posts: 5228
From: Sacramento,California
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted February 18, 2008 08:05 PM
I believe that the time of birth matters.I was born 2 weeks early. I was born after a 23 hour labor. It was induced as I fell asleep during labor(that's what mom told me...told me that I was lazy even in the womb). She even told me that I didn't cry when I was born until they poked me. She told me that I went back to sleep and that I was the only baby in the fetal position. If I was born on the day that my mom started labor,I'd have Moon in Aquarius and no t-square
instead I have Moon in Pisces in t-square.
I ended up having same moonsign as both my father and maternal grandfather to reflect similar moonsign lessons that I am supposed to learn as them. I didn't fall to drugs and alcohol like them. IP: Logged |
Motorgirl
unregistered
|
posted February 18, 2008 08:13 PM
But then what of unnatural childbirths? In Mexico a whopping 90% of mothers get c-section deliveries. They literally call their doctor up and make an appointment for their delivery. Many trendy manhattanites do it to.My point is that prof. astrologers seem to believe that it is the first breath that matters most. If so I wonder if there are others who have tried to schedule their child's birth to give them a great chart. IP: Logged |
Glaucus
Moderator Posts: 5228
From: Sacramento,California
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted February 18, 2008 08:19 PM
I wouldn't. I believe that there is purpose of why we are born with the planetary positions that we have.
I believe that we even choose our parents and circumstances before we incarnate. I also believe that the planetary positions are in synchronicity with our makeups.
also what's considered a great chart is relative.....especially depending on the system too....whether regular astrology,classical astrology,cosmobiology,uranian astrology,magi astrology,etc.
many successful people have t-squares too.
hard aspects aren't necessarily bad.
Cosmobiologists don't even see hard aspects as challenging but event-oriented aspects. They don't put much emphasis on soft aspects.
IP: Logged |
blue moon
Knowflake Posts: 1344
From: U.K
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted February 19, 2008 05:11 AM
Life rarely works to such nice, neat little plans. If you scour an ephemeris and pick a date that doesn't mean ovulation and delivery are going to play along. It is highly unrealistic that anyone could plan for date and time of birth - unless they elected for a caesarian for that purpose. They would still have had to got pregnant 'on schedule'. Even if by some major stroke of luck it all works and you get the fantastic chart you want for your child, they might still screw everything up. That's the free will factor. No-one can say they've never made a bad choice or a mistake, but there are people who won't own them and don't learn. That could just as well be the person with a chart full of trines, sextiles and one wide opposition, as the next person with a couple of nasty t-squares. Knowing a case in point, I can tell you the one that moved on and didn't end up bitter and destructive was the one with the 'worst' chart. IP: Logged |
Inner depths
unregistered
|
posted February 19, 2008 07:57 PM
Hmmmmmmmmmm Astro designer babies eh? I dunno about this topic - though I do have something I can relate.At the later stages of my pregnancy with my daughter I had difficulty walking etc. My Ob-GYN has offered to do an induction and I looked at the calendar for the next week and thought the day with the cancer moon would be good. My doc scheduled for the day before - when the moon was in Gemini Conj the Sun/Saturn opposite Pluto in Saggy. I didn't like that mixture. The Doctor was late getting me in and I did have my daughter on the day I eyeballed from the week before. My daughter's moon is in Cancer conj Mars/Jupiter/Venus. I'm an Aries - so moon conj mars would be fitting. I have Jupiter in sag conj Neptune...moon conj Jupiter in my daughter's chart would fit. When I did up her chart - it really fit and the planet in houses seemed to carry over some - so some of the chart themes in her chart passed over from her father's and mine.
It was interesting to see this.....
IP: Logged |
Lindaland
UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! 
