Lindaland
  Astrology
  biquintile, biseptile, binovile orb

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   biquintile, biseptile, binovile orb
Bucketrider
Knowflake

Posts: 244
From: northeast
Registered: Aug 2006

posted April 07, 2008 07:51 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Bucketrider     Edit/Delete Message
For a while I saw multiples of harmonic aspects as the same as the primary aspect. Septile is the same as biseptile. Recently I have been feeling that the quincunx deserves a larger orb than it has been getting as it is a major aspect. As major as the opposition or trine, IMO. The problem with giving it a wider orb is it runs into the biquintile and triseptile. My orbs for these aspects were around 2 degrees. Is there any logic to seeing multiples of 5, 7, and 9 as weaker than their primary harmonics or 72, 51.25 and 80?
Are we even sure that multiples of these harmonics are really an influence? Maybe each successive generation of harmonic is only half as strong as its original? Or should it be the other way around?

I am thinking of increasing the quincunx orb to 4 - 5 degrees.

IP: Logged

Glaucus
Knowflake

Posts: 2761
From: Sacramento,California,USA
Registered: Jul 2006

posted April 08, 2008 01:24 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Glaucus     Edit/Delete Message
I disagree with the quincunx being major aspect. They are not Ptolemaic aspects,and those are what referred to as major aspects.

also if you use quincunx as a major aspect,then why not the semisextile? If a planet is quincunx an angle,it's semisextile the opposite angle.

If you look at 4-5 degree quincunx in the 12th harmonic chart,the planets/points would not be close to being in conjunction.


for instance.
I have Moon quincunx Pluto with 2'19 orb.
If I look at it in 12th harmonic chart, the planets are in separation of 27'57. That's no way near a conjunction.

I feel that I can relate to having a Moon-Pluto aspect, but I have Moon sesquiquadrate Sun/Pluto - '06 any way.

I do believe that the 5th,7th,and 9th harmonic aspects are valid. I don't put much emphasis on them unless they have either tight orb or part of an aspect configuration....especially if it has a corresponding midpoint picture.

also primary 9th harmonic is 40 degrees.

I definitely wouldn't use 2 degree orb for 7th harmonic aspects. I use 1 degree orb for them. I don't like using more than 1 degree orb for 5th harmonic aspects.


I have Sun biquintile Midheaven - '06
I have Mercury biquintile Eris - '06


btw...I don't see minor aspects as minor. They just require smaller orbs. Robert Hand said that in his book,HOROSCOPE SYMBOLS too.
semisquare and sesquiquadrate can be significant aspects if they are within half a degree orb. Cosmobiologists,Uranian Astrologers see them as more important than trine and sextile.

It really depends on the system.


I am considering using orbs in proportion to the harmonic.


------------------
Stop The Misdiagnosing Of Neurodivergents http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/stop-the-misdiagnosing-of-neurodivergents

IP: Logged

Bucketrider
Knowflake

Posts: 244
From: northeast
Registered: Aug 2006

posted April 08, 2008 03:53 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Bucketrider     Edit/Delete Message
Thanks for the input.

We have pretty different takes on what works based on our experience and personal bias I guess. I think midpoint pics are ok if they substantiate what is already there with the basics. I have been studying the quincunx for a couple of years pretty closely and am pretty sure at this point a 4 degree orb is justified.

There are dif approaches to orb. I have been working with john addy's notion that there are 12 primary aspects which would lead to a starting point of 12 for a conjunction, 6 for an opposition and so on. These orbs do work well in my experience. I have not seen an authentic square working beyond 3 degrees. It was always a stretch to feel a square at 5-6. Same for a sextile which gets 2 orb with this system.

The problem with arbitrarily assigning 1 deg orb to all minor aspects is it ignores the notion that the number 5 is more fundamental than 9 as it divides a circle into less parts. A 2.4 orb for a quintile seems legit and a 1.3 for novile does as well. The problem is with the multiples of 5 and 9.

In all honesty, while I have definitely seen the quintile and novile working as an aspect many times, I never really see the binovile, quadnovile or biquintile manifest alone. When I come across it my thought is always - "I guess its there, I just dont know the person/situation well enough, etc." Which leads me to believe that they either dont really exist or they only exist as a harmonic system with their primary in aspect. When there is a series of septiles or quintiles in relationship with each other - the bi and tri versions of the aspect count. When the quadnovile occurs alone it is not activated.

In any case, the orb for a triseptile is probably only about .5. Continuing with the notion that 12/7 is the septile orb - of 1.7 - a biseptile would be half that at .8 and a triseptile would be about .5. Unlike the trine and opposition which can be seen as more fundamental and powerful harmonics of the sextile and square, the bi and triseptile are higher and less powerful harmonics of the fundamental. Which would indicate a lower orb. They would only come into play if there were a series of septiles all linked. On its own, it is not significant and the quincunx at 4 orb is legit, IMO.

IP: Logged

All times are Eastern Standard Time

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | Linda-Goodman.com

Copyright © 2008

Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.46a