Author
|
Topic: Is astrology an illusion?
|
ListensToTrees Knowflake Posts: 5672 From: Infinity Registered: Jul 2005
|
posted September 07, 2008 09:40 PM
I'm going to be cheeky here and share these thoughts I've been having...about whether astrology might simply be an illusion. Sure, the moon has been shown scientifically to affect us, and magnetic influences from the planets definitely have some impact too.... but how accurate is astrology?Surely each person can relate in some way to each description of the zodiac signs, I know I can. So what if, in reality, we are all of them? As David Icke comically put it....the voice that spoke to him during his Ayhuasca experience- asked him if he though The Infinite sat down to have its horoscope read. We are all infinite. We are all of them....all of the zodiac signs. Because when we read the description of our sign or our natal chart, because we believe in it, even at some level, could it simply be a self fulfilling prophecy? That we start to act like it, more and more? Before anybody gets ready to chastise me, please allow me to confess.... I have not made my mind up yet. ------------------ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9JitDWQI9qc&feature=related IP: Logged |
Kick It Knowflake Posts: 1032 From: Leeds Registered: May 2008
|
posted September 07, 2008 09:44 PM
Are you trying to ask if we are all of the signs, or maybe even none of them? That it doesnt exist?Wasnt clear. Vague.
IP: Logged |
23 Knowflake Posts: 4497 From: Outside, to watch the nightfall in the rain Registered: Aug 2006
|
posted September 07, 2008 09:52 PM
I've often thought astrology might be an illusion I care to believe in, the reason why I say this is that we choose to see things in astrology or maybe bend things to how we like to see them. For example, people endlessly go off doing synastry/electional astrology etc and we say this will happen and that will happen or this has happened or that has happened. But is astrology trying to compartmentalise or break down things that are a continuum. I mean, you could say that about anything really. Science has constants in equations (I like to call them fudge factors myself) to get formulae work, it breaks things down into concepts. Nothing in the universe can wholly describe the universe IMHO, so I guess everything is an illusion. IP: Logged |
Winged_Feet Knowflake Posts: 119 From: Registered: Sep 2004
|
posted September 07, 2008 10:03 PM
nicely put 23.IP: Logged |
Kick It Knowflake Posts: 1032 From: Leeds Registered: May 2008
|
posted September 07, 2008 10:06 PM
Just being straight with an answer....yes, we are all of them. Each one represented in your natal through the houses or different areas of life.Is it an illusion in the manner of a SFP? Yes, If you keep reading about it, start thinking it then it will become real. Is it not real? No, its very real. Hope that was clear IP: Logged |
Unmoved Knowflake Posts: 2160 From: Born in S.Africa Registered: Jun 2007
|
posted September 07, 2008 10:17 PM
Everything is an illusion but simultaneously, 'I think therefore I am, so my thoughts affect matter. These two dynamics are complementary not opposing. A Divine Dichotomy. So, Everyting is an illusion, e.g. astrology and that which is not everything. And if I think astrology is not an illusion, then it is not an illusion UNLESS your thought is less than the critical mass of the collective's thoughts that think that astrology is an illusion. one can even say, as it has been said, that history is written by the victors which means that truth is decided by those who have more energy more power than you, the critical mass of thought to over throw your thought. i know you got me LTT so to anyone who pokes fun at my response because it is too convoluted... Tough. IP: Logged |
23 Knowflake Posts: 4497 From: Outside, to watch the nightfall in the rain Registered: Aug 2006
|
posted September 07, 2008 10:25 PM
quote: one can even say, as it has been said, that history is written by the victors which means that truth is decided by those who have more energy than you, the critical mass of thought to over throw your thought.
I think I understand what you are saying however in relation to the bit that I quoted above from you, I think that critical mass may have something else that creates it. I think there is something like "luck" the more that I think about it. Not sure how to define "luck", an extremely positive coincidence? I was quite neutral as to what luck is, however the older I get, the more I think it exists. For example (pretty dumb I know): Duran Duran versus Japan. Two bands very similar style. Duran Duran seems to have heavily borrowed from Japan. Japan started as a glam rock band and by 1980 they were thought to have produced the first new wave record. Why is Duran Duran remembered and Japan not? Duran Duran you might argue are better. However, I think Japan might be better because they might be seen as more innovative and artistic. Duran Duran succeeded because they were at the right place at the right time, they released their first record in 1981 and everyone was ready for new wave by then. That is luck I think. I've also seen it happen in my own life. So in relation to victors, critical mass might determine the history of what is written but critical mass involves luck*. Likewise, belief in astrology might require luck. Sorry, I'm a bit off topic there. *EDIT - victors may also just have stronger resources or technology for example IP: Logged |
Kick It Knowflake Posts: 1032 From: Leeds Registered: May 2008
|
posted September 07, 2008 10:36 PM
Whos Japan?IP: Logged |
23 Knowflake Posts: 4497 From: Outside, to watch the nightfall in the rain Registered: Aug 2006
|
posted September 07, 2008 10:39 PM
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japan_(band) http://www.lifeintokyo.net/ IP: Logged |
Kick It Knowflake Posts: 1032 From: Leeds Registered: May 2008
|
posted September 07, 2008 10:44 PM
God bless the internet!So back to the astrology...you say belief will require luck? You kind of mean coincidence and chance of getting a few things correct? A few things happen and that makes it real? You just going off on Jupiter? IP: Logged |
23 Knowflake Posts: 4497 From: Outside, to watch the nightfall in the rain Registered: Aug 2006
|
posted September 07, 2008 10:47 PM
Kick it - I think things are a bit more complex. The DD v Japan example is very simple, I'm sure there was a lot more going there like talent, ambition etc. I don't think life can be simply described as luck, nor the universe, it simply might be another ingredient and it was specifically mentioned in relation to what Unmoved said. I said at the start that the universe is a continuum. We are simply trying to break down the unfathomable, unexplainable (to humans), enormous universe into something we understand (just shows how minute we really are in the end, doesn't it?)IP: Logged |
23 Knowflake Posts: 4497 From: Outside, to watch the nightfall in the rain Registered: Aug 2006
|
posted September 07, 2008 10:48 PM
And least I'm trying to understand, I do have jupiter in the 1st you know. (Venus in 9th/sag GC unaspected!!)IP: Logged |
Kick It Knowflake Posts: 1032 From: Leeds Registered: May 2008
|
posted September 07, 2008 10:56 PM
From my perspective the other ingredient you are talking about is astrology. Or "time" being another description for it. Fourth dimension I think. IP: Logged |
Unmoved Knowflake Posts: 2160 From: Born in S.Africa Registered: Jun 2007
|
posted September 07, 2008 10:57 PM
I'm still at that stage where I see the harmony between chaos, luck and stuff, but it works with some plan. Sort of like saying that the more you work, the luckier you get. Ya know? what about Jupiter? Wait. I hate it when my mind does this because I'm being silly now. Could LTT mean that there are no planets out there and that Nasa aka the machines, made all that stuff up to keep us entertained while they harvest our energy Matrix style? Or are we talking about the Einstein thing of molecules being where we expect them to be? Actually, I think we are all talking about totally difffrent things. IP: Logged |
23 Knowflake Posts: 4497 From: Outside, to watch the nightfall in the rain Registered: Aug 2006
|
posted September 07, 2008 11:03 PM
Kick It - the fourth dimension actually is time x, y, z are the physical planes. Physicists say there could be 11 dimensions except they are tightly coiled (string theory). I'm not a physicist myself and so my knowledge is only limited to this. IP: Logged |
Kick It Knowflake Posts: 1032 From: Leeds Registered: May 2008
|
posted September 07, 2008 11:12 PM
Besides looking at personality - the way to measure time, apart from looking at a clock, is called....astrology. What is time again?IP: Logged |
23 Knowflake Posts: 4497 From: Outside, to watch the nightfall in the rain Registered: Aug 2006
|
posted September 07, 2008 11:15 PM
Well time is hard to describe. The measurement or study of time is actually called chronology. Maybe astrology ("star" "studies") is time-measuring by by-product. As for what time is, well that's a continuum of the 4th dimension. As to what it is to the average individual, it allows the development of events in the future and memories of the past and life for the living to occur now. Not sure. EDIT - star studies allow us to look at personality etc as a by-product yet again. IP: Logged |
Unmoved Knowflake Posts: 2160 From: Born in S.Africa Registered: Jun 2007
|
posted September 07, 2008 11:23 PM
And time gets thrown in the pot. This is going to get complicated I demand that LTT rephrase her point and stream line it a bit. I mean... Time is an illusion if astrology is an illusion, unless it is not of course, depending on how the individual defines what "real".is . 23, you are saying that x and y are the 2 planes of horizontal and vertical and -y the third plane... and time is another physical plane? If so, and I ask because I have no idea, where does z sit since time is not linear? actually, don't worry about it. It's too deep. IP: Logged |
23 Knowflake Posts: 4497 From: Outside, to watch the nightfall in the rain Registered: Aug 2006
|
posted September 07, 2008 11:28 PM
quote: Time is an illusion if astrology is an illusion
Yes, because everything is or nothing is. I said to Kick it that time is a by-produce measurement of astrology but astrology wouldn't work if there is no time. If there is no time, planets can't move. There wouldn't be things such as transits, progressions, aspects, planets in signs/houses etc etc. Best way to see it is this way: x - length y - height z - depth These are the three physical planes. Think of a cube, three dimensions. If it is moving (or is stationary), then it needs time, the fourth. Of course points can be in that cube or universe. But now we are complicating things IP: Logged |
Unmoved Knowflake Posts: 2160 From: Born in S.Africa Registered: Jun 2007
|
posted September 08, 2008 01:04 AM
I get it 23 to simplify it for myself I introduced -y because y and z are intrinsically one line which is theoretically divided by the horizon x. So I called upper plane y and the lower one -y. But I realised that I was mixing calculus with physics by doing that. time is just relative. It's our perspective of time that allows us to have astrology because matter is dense. If matter vibrated faster than the speed of light for example we'd be born at the same time we die because we would be moving so fast that we aren't moving. When everything experientially happens at once. So wouldn't you say that it is not the time that gives us astrology but instead it's our vantage point that allows us to see time as we do, within our space time continuum? time is constant from my understanding and it is not time that passes but us that move amongst it, or in it because it is the stage and we are the actors moving all over it. Sometime we move slowly and this is when we see the details of it, and when we move faster it fades. IP: Logged |
Unmoved Knowflake Posts: 2160 From: Born in S.Africa Registered: Jun 2007
|
posted September 08, 2008 01:40 AM
Also, I can't see time as the 4th dimension because the entity which we call time was around at 2d just as it exists now in our 3d reality. It's that thing which was there before it all and that which shall remain when all implodes. It's the first cause, the Alpha and Omega and That's why Aristotle called it the Unmoved Mover - that's where my username comes from btw. so, time can't be the 4th dimension. It's the matrix that is in between matter but that which isn't matter. That's why time really doesn't matter. So, I agree with 23 when she said that if astrology is an illusion, everything and that which isn't everything is also an illusion. you asked whether astro was accurate. I say it isn't and it shouldn't be because if it is accurate we would relinquish our power to create as created creators that we are. So, astro is a guide to show you, probable outcomes to the choices you have made, knowingly or not. If you see astro as definite, then you are seeing an illusion or a shadow of what astro should be, not real astrology. and yes, when you get an accurate prediction or summation of a person's character through astro, most of it or at least half of it was your doing, you instincts and you contributed even if subconsciously. . IP: Logged |
blue moon Moderator Posts: 4700 From: U.K Registered: Dec 2007
|
posted September 08, 2008 01:57 AM
It's symbolic.IP: Logged |
23 Knowflake Posts: 4497 From: Outside, to watch the nightfall in the rain Registered: Aug 2006
|
posted September 08, 2008 02:28 AM
quote: time is just relative. It's our perspective of time that allows us to have astrology because matter is dense. If matter vibrated faster than the speed of light for example we'd be born at the same time we die because we would be moving so fast that we aren't moving. When everything experientially happens at once.So wouldn't you say that it is not the time that gives us astrology but instead it's our vantage point that allows us to see time as we do, within our space time continuum?
Well yes, we are moving at such slow speed in relation to the the speed of light that time does not bend. Time is bent or slowed down if we move closer to the speed of light, time becomes relative. As to what happens when we do travel at the speed of light, no one really know I think (or that was my memory). Does it stop? Does it go backwards if we go faster? No one really knows, we're really not in any position to know, our technology can't match that, the fastest jet is nowhere near what the speed of light can do. quote: Also, I can't see time as the 4th dimension because the entity which we call time was around at 2d just as it exists now in our 3d reality. It's that thing which was there before it all and that which shall remain when all implodes. It's the first cause, the Alpha and Omega and That's why Aristotle called it the Unmoved Mover - that's where my username comes from btw. so, time can't be the 4th dimension. It's the matrix that is in between matter but that which isn't matter. That's why time really doesn't matter.
Maybe time isn't the fourth, maybe time isn't but from basic physics time always is! Maybe what you are saying is that energy is mass by saying matrix between the matter. Energy = mass (defect) x speed of light squared. Energy is independent of time as such. Time is another dimension as is the physical planes. Energy exists in these planes but is not a dimension as such. quote: you asked whether astro was accurate. I say it isn't and it shouldn't be because if it is accurate we would relinquish our power to create as created creators that we are. So, astro is a guide to show you, probable outcomes to the choices you have made, knowingly or not. If you see astro as definite, then you are seeing an illusion or a shadow of what astro should be, not real astrology.and yes, when you get an accurate prediction or summation of a person's character through astro, most of it or at least half of it was your doing, you instincts and you contributed even if subconsciously. .
As BM put it, its symbolic, that's one way of looking at it. Is astrology an art of science? An art does not really use precision, maybe science does, maybe that's the difference. I'd say astrology is an art, its about interpretation and its subjective. When someone seeks advice and presents their chart, different people see different things. They interpret what they have seen and some interpret what they want to see. Science is black and white in that respect, there is a "universal truth". So astrology is an art, there is no right. Grey area. Which goes back to whether it is an illusion or not, does it work or not. And if it does work, can we detect when it does? I mean some of the workings might actually be rather subconscious and we can't see it or maybe no one can, maybe someone else viewing us can see it. IP: Logged |
amowls Knowflake Posts: 866 From: Richmond, VA USA Registered: Dec 2007
|
posted September 08, 2008 02:34 AM
We are all of them. There are 12 signs in a birth chart, and (of course depending on what house system you use and where you were born) theoretically all of those signs rule certain areas of your life. Some are just stronger than others.Like for me: Gemini rules my body, my outer mask, my ability to wound or be wounded Cancer rules my material values (and my progressed body) Leo rules my expression Virgo rules my family & home and sense of security Libra rules my emotions and how i relate to children, creativity, and how i like to be romanced Scorpio rules my ability to transform and health Sagittarius rules how i relate to others, the type of person I'm looking for, my sense of responsibility and rebellion, and my energy drive Capricorn rules how i relate to death, the occult, my idealism and group values Aquarius rules my ego, my thought process, how i relate to the law Pisces rules how i relate to the public, how I like to give and receive love Aries rules how i relate to friends, and my capacity for luck Taurus rules my inner most psychology Astrology is just makes it easy to figure out psychology. IP: Logged |
Love Knowflake Posts: 1011 From: Canada Registered: Feb 2006
|
posted September 08, 2008 03:26 AM
Most people accept all the different branches of psychology. Along with those come different methodologies as well. All the "ologies", as I like to call them, are rooted in observation therefore are subject to bias, even if just a tiny bit.We're all going to filter things differently based on the way we see the world. Compare a therapist who works exclusively with talk therapy versus a therapist who uses body-work versus another one who focuses more so on regression work: all of them are likely helping people, even though the method by which they help their clients is different. The point is, does it work for these people? If it does, then it's really just a difference in methodology. Further, the manner in which the clients themselves come to their own epiphanies and transform on a personal level, in part due to their therapy, will be different even if they are seeking help from the same therapist. Ultimately, we're all working on figuring the same things out, we just get there in our own unique ways, in our own time. I believe that astrology is just another vehicle by which we choose to understand people. Our biases will be reflected in our interpretations to varying degrees and we will always see astrology through our own personal lens. But there is no more or no less illusion in astrology than you will find in any "ology". Just a lot less public acceptance. IP: Logged | |