Author
|
Topic: Question about my natal chart
|
Scorp31 Knowflake Posts: 116 From: Registered: Jun 2008
|
posted October 14, 2008 03:37 PM
Forgive me if this has been covered before. There are five house positions in my chart:1st Asc = Libra 7th = Aries 8th = Taurus 9th North Node = Gemini 11th = Leo That do not have any planets, asteroids or aspects to other houses/signs in my chart, the 1st house Ascendant does have aspects to other areas of my chart but no planets. What significance if any does this mean good or bad
------------------ ------------------ Sun: Scorpio Moon: Capricorn Ascendant: Libra IP: Logged |
Scorp31 Knowflake Posts: 116 From: Registered: Jun 2008
|
posted October 14, 2008 06:38 PM
BumpIP: Logged |
Kick It Knowflake Posts: 1032 From: Leeds Registered: May 2008
|
posted October 14, 2008 06:46 PM
Having no planets in a house can indicate an area whiich needs less focus in this life than the others.Having no aspects to other planets? Depends which system you use. No planet is unaspected to me. All join up with the others, whether good or bad. IP: Logged |
Scorp31 Knowflake Posts: 116 From: Registered: Jun 2008
|
posted October 14, 2008 07:42 PM
Interesting... The system I used was Placidus does that help?IP: Logged |
Kick It Knowflake Posts: 1032 From: Leeds Registered: May 2008
|
posted October 14, 2008 07:46 PM
Equal or whole sign.Whole sign is aesthetically better because it has the MC different to the 10th house and also the AC different to the 1st house. Both the AC and MC become points, just like a natal chart, rather than a line. IP: Logged |