posted May 24, 2013 05:27 AM            

CLOSED FOR NOW, THANKS

1. Ceridwen
2. Jessica2407
3. Gemgurl

- offering THREE experimental tarot readings -

I would like to try out an experimental spread. I specifically put the cards down for astrological correspondence to define what chart your 'perfect lover' should have. Or to tone it down: what will be a good match for you. Do take the outcome with a pinch of salt and don't start rejecting great love interests because they don't have the right sun sign

What is it?
I'll be looking at sun sign - moon - venus & the overall chart energy.
Some feedback required and please note I only know basic astrology (so you might have to refine the astro interpretation I give you), but I do know my cards

If you want one, please let me know. I'll do them either this evening or tomorrow.

posted May 24, 2013 05:36 AM            

I am curious about that. So you can use me as guinea pig. VEry happily to play!

posted May 24, 2013 06:13 AM            

Guinea pig I mean

posted May 24, 2013 06:17 AM            

This is so cool! Thank you

posted May 24, 2013 11:53 AM            

Right, I pulled some cards for you. Your perfect partner would have the following placements is his chart:

Sun = Taurus (if not a Taurus, an earth sun would do you well).
Moon = Ideally Aries, but scorpio would do you well also.
Venus = Capricorn ( or at least an earth sign).

Overall feel of the chart: Jupiter would have to be rather prominent in this person’s chart. So either Sagittarius or Pisces.

I get the feeling you need a charismatic, charming man, who will get on with other people easily and is just pleasant company, BUT clearly has his own principles, is steadfast with them & will live up to his own inner standards (but not in a preaching way, he just knows who he is). He is a 'worldly type'. Reliability is important for you (but I think for most of us, lol), but this partner can also easily tune in to what you tell him and feel on a spiritual level and can go along with that until an extent. His base is however in the material world.
You can also do well with the deep, brooding, intellectual type (, but I think the fire placements will bring you more playfulness & fun and with type 1 you still have deep convo’s at times.
As an extra: if he would have a rather ‘fixed’ chart, I think that can also add to him being a good match.
If this is completely of, sorry, I’ll then make it up with a general tarot reading asking what type fits you.

posted May 24, 2013 01:26 PM            

Of course there is a particular man I have in mind; you could call him a crush, or a catalyst, or whatever. But meeting him has resulted in a lot of catharsis for him (and we don`t even know each other for real. lol) - well, I mean, catharsis for me (though it seems that we made some very similiar experiences and decisions in the last years, and pretty much simultaneously. lol).

"Sun = Taurus (if not a Taurus, an earth sun would do you well). "W
Well, to be honest I`ve never really fallen for a Taurus-Sun, though it WOULD make sense. Taurus is in my 5th house of playful romantic and erotic attraction.
My first crush ever had Moon and Venus in Taurus though.

If I am not falling for firesigns (Sagittarius and Aries - pretty much never Leo), then the Sun happens to be in Earth, but usually Capricorn (because my Venus is there), and Virgo has happened, too, though more so in the past. Nowadays, if Virgo, then it is their Mars, and it is opposing my Jupiter in Pisces and widely trine my Venus.

My Jupiter MUST be strongly activated as it disposists my Sun, Mercury, Mars, ASC, NN in Sagittarius, and thus is also chartruler.
It is not for all people like this, but I am very attracted to my mirror-energy. Some people would find it pretty boring to connect to someone else via their 1st house ruler, or might find it compatible and nice, but not thrilling.
However my 7th house ruler, Mercury, is in Sag conjunct my Sun in 1st house. Someone who is like me is what I need. Or who is partly like me, at least.

Cap Suns very often have placements in Sagittarius, as well. And of course my Venus in Cap adores them.

So basically Sun signs I have been attracted to, are usually Sagittarius, Capricorn, Aries, Virgo (Libra in my youth).

posted May 24, 2013 01:34 PM            

"Moon = Ideally Aries, but scorpio would do you well also. "

I LOVE Aries-Moon. It happened so often, even my best friend has Moon in Aries. lol
I also love Moon in Sagittarius, at least as of lately.

And I`ve repeatedly felt an ultrastrong attraction to late Libra-Mooners or early Scorpio-Mooners. Well my Uranus, dispositor of my Aqua Moon, is on 1 Scorpio, and usually conjuncts their Moons. While this is deliciously thrilling to me, I probably drive THEM crazy.

"Venus = Capricorn ( or at least an earth sign)."
Yes. Venus in an earth sign, and ESPECIALLY Capricorn is such a major turn on for me. In the very least Venus MUST be in a Yin sign, Venus in Sag being the only exception.

However looking back in my life, Venus in Capricorn has been the most constant Venus-sign in gentlemen I felt drawn to. (Venus in Taurus has happened, too, and as I said Mars in Virgo).

Actually my current "whatever" has Venus in Capricorn as well, though not conjunct my Venus.

But I guess I need that feel of stability and earthy sincerity. When it comes to relationships, I am definitely not very lighthearted.

"Overall feel of the chart: Jupiter would have to be rather prominent in this person’s chart. So either Sagittarius or Pisces."
Yes.
Definitely. My Jupiter is in Pisces in mutual reception and square with Neptune in Sag, too.

That guy I mentioned, not only has Sun, Moon, Mercury, chartruler and MC in Sagittarius, but we have very strong Jupiter-synastry, from both sides. As a matter of fact, Jupiter is dispositing both our Sag-stellia, and his is in Virgo, mine in Pisces, and they are exactly opposite.

Generally speaking, all men I have ever been interested in, had a mutable ASC (one exception with Aries-ASC). And it was either Sagittarius or evn more common Pisces. It has come so far, that should I not know a celebritie`s ASC, one who gets my attention very strongly, I would almost SWEAR his ASC was in Pisces, or maybe in Sagittarius. It just turned out that way so often.

posted May 24, 2013 01:41 PM            

"I get the feeling you need a charismatic, charming man, who will get on with other people easily and is just pleasant company, BUT clearly has his own principles, is steadfast with them & will live up to his own inner standards (but not in a preaching way, he just knows who he is). He is a 'worldly type'. Reliability is important for you (but I think for most of us, lol), but this partner can also easily tune in to what you tell him and feel on a spiritual level and can go along with that until an extent. His base is however in the material world.
You can also do well with the deep, brooding, intellectual type (, but I think the fire placements will bring you more playfulness & fun and with type 1 you still have deep convo’s at times."

Totally spot on. Perfectly put!

That is the man I need in my life, it just hits me how much my crush is like that. No wonder he won`t leave my mind. lol

The enthusiasm, idealism, fiery positive vibe is totally important for me, especially since I tend to be quite brooding with my Cappy Venus square Pluto myself.
But of course I could never put up with any kind of player type, I am just too serious for this.

But what is very important, too, is that he is grounded, earthy, real, both feet on the ground (but with an ability to dream grand dreams).
It is a good complement to me and my mind that is often taking me away to quite some lofty places.

I never was aware of that before I met this guy. But his physicality was fascinating to me, how someone could be so much resting in his body, and be so confident, warm and real about it. Mesmerizing.
Like a strange world for my Aqua-Moon, but something I need to incorporate in my own life as well.
With my Venus in Cap I do have it, the ability to sense inside my own body, but i just have neglected it for so long, so that my mind and body started speaking totally different languages.

posted May 25, 2013 03:24 AM            

Here's your reading. Question: "What would the chart of Jessica's (perfect) partner ideally look like to be a good match?"

Sun = I’m getting someone with an air sign like Libra would be good for you (other air signs as well, but I’m getting the feeling that a full blown aqua or gem would probably be a bit much for you in their expressing. So ideally a Libra, but other air signs are suitable). I’m also expecting their sun would have to make a good aspect to the moon (like sun trine moon for example – please fill in other aspects yourself, lol. )

Moon = Aquarius

Venus= Ideally Pisces or Scorpio (this depends. I’m leaning towards pisces. Scorpio would do you well, but it depends on the Mars placements. If it’s scorpio + a too intense mars it’s too much for you).

Overall chart energy = Similar with what I said with Venus. If you go with all the first options this persons chart would have to have a prominent MARS energy to it. Otherwise the sign of Pisces (or Neptune) must play an important role to balance things out.

I’m getting the moon sign is probably most important in a perfect partner for you. I’m not sure if that is because you work with the vedic astrology (that’s moon based, right or not?) But it seems to play a prominent role in your reading. That as a side note.

posted May 25, 2013 05:12 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Ceridwen:
WOW, Twirl, to be honest, I didn´t expect this. I mean I was pretty sure you would have a good intuition, but this so spot on, just WOW!

---

posted May 25, 2013 07:01 AM            

I find your reading most interesting. I thought this was experimental :P

Could it be possible that you picked up on the guy who is in my life at the moment? I'll come back to it in a bit.

Okay about the signs:

''Here's your reading. Question: "What would the chart of Jessica's (perfect) partner ideally look like to be a good match?"

Sun = I’m getting someone with an air sign like Libra would be good for you (other air signs as well, but I’m getting the feeling that a full blown aqua or gem would probably be a bit much for you in their expressing. So ideally a Libra, but other air signs are suitable). I’m also expecting their sun would have to make a good aspect to the moon (like sun trine moon for example – please fill in other aspects yourself, lol. )

Moon = Aquarius

Venus= Ideally Pisces or Scorpio (this depends. I’m leaning towards pisces. Scorpio would do you well, but it depends on the Mars placements. If it’s scorpio + a too intense mars it’s too much for you).

Overall chart energy = Similar with what I said with Venus. If you go with all the first options this persons chart would have to have a prominent MARS energy to it. Otherwise the sign of Pisces (or Neptune) must play an important role to balance things out.

I’m getting the moon sign is probably most important in a perfect partner for you. I’m not sure if that is because you work with the vedic astrology (that’s moon based, right or not?) But it seems to play a prominent role in your reading. That as a side note.''

Yeah, you are absolutely right on the money about the moon sign being more important to me. Not because I'm into Vedic (lol).I guess my cancer moon takes over when it's about sentimental/romantic interests.

My IC is in Aries. I believe I'm attracted to guys who have prominent Mars and Pluto in their charts.

posted May 25, 2013 07:05 AM            

THIS is what intrigues me most.

Seriously,is it possible that you picked up on the man who is in my life at the moment?

Because you've described him TO THE DOT. TO.THE.DOT girl! I'm absolutely floored!Even the part where you say he is a man of influence!

posted May 25, 2013 07:09 AM            

His Venus is in Pisces,Neptune in the 7th house.

posted May 25, 2013 07:17 AM            

"C) If a person has a strong Jupiter it will instantly activate my chart. "

Yes, this is what I call "personal or natal resonance".
I can have the most wonderful interaspect with someone, but they will be built on air or sand, if there is no hook in his real personality.
If a person has Sagittarius traits or a strong Jupiter, there is this "echo" to my own chart, and thus my soul will be in a state of possible resonance.

However, on its own, that would not be enough. If there were just no interapsects, it might stay a potential, a possibility just barely on the threshold of consciousness. A good idea. A feeling/ thinking of: "Oh he would be great/ amazing/ perfect fit".
But it would all be in the "would-state" (and as we all know, there has to be a second part ot that sentence, and it usually starts with "if (only)".

The natal resonance is the ground, the basis, on which you can build something. The earth is fertile and good. But you still have to plant a seed there, so anything can grow.

You need a trigger, something that energizes you to get active, to actively MAKE something out of it, to actually build something, to manifest the potential, to express it.

And that "energy connection" is what is being made by aspects. They provide the channel, the connection, through which this particular energy (Jupiter) can flow.

And since there is natal resonance, it feels not only uplifiting and optimistic, but it feels like something from deep inside is being fulfilled (cause I have it in my natal, and maybe he feels it a bit, too, as he has it in his natal as well).
Kindred spirits, at least in this area of the chart.

"Also this new man you are connecting with really sounds lovely. I hope you will meet up in real life! Sounds like you two would complement each other. "
Yes, it`s interesting. WE are so different in expression (him a total extrovert, me not so much.lol) and also quite different educational background.
But at the same time something inside me just strongly resonates on a more personal level.
Plus it amazed me quite much, how similiar our upbringing seems to have been, how similiar our family situation is (and how do I even know? lol).
how he has been, and still is, living in the city that is neighbouring the city, my great grandmother has been living, (actually the distane is just about 5 kilometres. lol), and we have spent so many sundays there during my childhood, taking walks, visiting castles, and so on, and in a way he brings up these very happy serene peaceful childhood memories for me.
The weird thing is that he brought them up even before I know where he was coming from. But really, he suddenly stood before me, and my first thought was: "It`s so great to meet you again."
It was like meeting someone you have once known (and who was very close to me, like in at least family-close), but lost contact and sort of forgot, but the moment you look at them, it`s all being there again, and it feels natural.
Actually, when we met that night, it was him who directly strode towards me, ignoring the much prettier girls around, and talking to him was so easy, as if we really had met before.
But that was this one time, when he took me by surprise so much that I was reacting quite naturally, and off guard; unfortunately my mind switched on itself after that and things became complicated, and it`s my fault.

we`ve never really talked again, unless you count him teasing me during the show, and on last concert when he was suddenly popping up out of nowwhere, while a group of women was lining up for the one single toilet they had there, and him making some silly jokes. lol
Of course it was not really directed at me, he probably just wanted to, well I have no clue what he was even doing there, shouldn`t he be backstage and recreate, for the second half of the show?

Anyway it was funny. But no communication taking place, at least not real verbal communication.

posted May 25, 2013 07:42 AM            

"Following your reading Ceri, I cross checked the natals of the 2 guys I knew before, we didn't have natal resonances although we had good synastry aspects."
Really, none at all? That is rare.

Usually some natal themes pop up, in order for people even pay attention to each other. Though in short term relationships or affairs, it might be secondary resonances (perhaps created by a resonance of a wide orbed sextile or something like that) and sometimes of course strong synastry can override that for a time.
Oh and progressions can make for passing resonances of course.

I find though the strongest resonances are being created through conjunctions, oppositions, squares and very precise other aspects.

While my Venus could be said to be widely sextile Uranus (5 degrees), the Venus-Pluto-square overrides it usually in terms of resonance. (Uranus resonates on the Sun-Moon-level though, by Moon being in Aquarius).

"So I came to the conclusion that synastry aspects are not indicative of whether a relationship will succeed or not."
No, they aren`t. At least not on their own. They can people draw together, and they do, as they are energetic connections, but the natal resonance have to come into play to add more substance.

"that stayed together despite rough patches with highly challenging synastry aspects had strong natal resonances.I believe that's the key to their 'success'."
Yes, I believe that, too.

It is the reason that some people not only stay together but seemingly thrive on Saturn or Uranus squares, while for others it is the "kiss of death" to their relationship.

posted May 25, 2013 08:09 AM            

Nope not all. I mean natal resonances. NN contacts.Yes. I have Saturn- NN with guy 1 and Venus-NN with guy 2. But no Sun/moon - NN, or chiron resonances. These guys didn't share the same 'wounds' shall I say? I've realized recently how prominent is my 4th House Chiron in my life. This is a very sensitive and I guess 'un-healable' thing for me. My chiron issues have cropped up majestically in both of these relationships but these guys have been ( now I don't blame them anyways) unequipped to deal with them (lol). That's because they didn't share the same 'roots',same 'wounds',they do not sense the resonances because it's not there in their charts.