posted October 26, 2004 10:19 AM
This is sad, Ozone and people will die needlessly thanks to the Bush administration. The government had access to the information from some of the EPA tests and from other sources who tested the air quality after 9/11. But the EPA was given orders from the Bush administration not to make their findings public ( more top secret info that the public didn't NEED to know). They told the EPA instead to tell the public and the workers that air quality was safe. This article comes from the Sierra Club an environmental group who, in the past, has always worked with the EPA and the government to insure the air quality, water quality, and all other environmental issues for public safety. Now the Sierra Club is denied any information from the government. Everything is secret as Bush believes the public need not know these things. I guess he feels that ignorance is bliss and as long as we don't know our air and water contamination is killing us we can all die blissfully. Bush has an abhorrable environmental record. The Republicans deny that global warming exists in spite of what enviromental scientists world wide are saying. His administration "greases the palms" of certain unscrupulous scientists to get them to say global warming does not exist to support his worldview and his concept of reality. The world according to Bush. A world we will all get sick and die in just so the corporations do not have to abide by any environmental safety laws and can, in the name of profit, continue to pollute our earth.
http://www.nynewsday.com/news/local/manhattan/wtc/nyc-sierrareport0819,0,4234933.story?coll=nyc-homepage-headlines Report: Bush showed 'reckless disregard' after 9/11
By Graham Rayman
Staff Writer
August 18, 2004, 8:28 PM EDT
The Bush administration misled the public about the health hazards of the smoke and dust at Ground Zero, a new report charges.
The Sierra Club report blames the thousands of cases of long-term respiratory illness among New Yorkers on the White House, the Environmental Protection Agency and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration for downplaying the health risks and shirking their regulatory oversight roles.
EPA officials, the report says, urged financial district workers to return to their jobs, repeatedly claiming the air was safe, using outdated testing gear and limited test results. The reassuring message didn't substantially change as the months dragged on, the report said.
At the same time, concerns were being raised by independent researchers.
The EPA's own researchers also noted concerns, but their studies never made it into the agency's public statements. The results were published only much later in scientific journals.
The result has been costly to local and federal governments, said Suzanne Mattei, the New York City Executive for the Sierra Club and the author of the report.
"The health care costs are significant, and there are many experienced first responders and others now on light duty, medical leave or retired because of lung problems," she said.
While the early focus was on asbestos, the more dangerous toxins were concrete dust and glass fibers -- the dangers of which were never highlighted to the public, the report concludes.
By Sept. 27, 2001, the government had test results showing the dust was caustic, but it never mentioned that in public statements, the report said. That data was not disclosed until December 2002 in a scientific journal, the report said.
Without performing a single test, the EPA already knew from many prior studies that the combination of open fires and demolition of buildings was by definition a health hazard, the report states.
"It's illegal in any state in the union," Mattei said. "It causes known health hazards. But instead of saying we need to clean to pre-contamination levels, they took a minimalist approach and used weak cleanup standards."
EPA officials yesterday issued a statement, saying, "The American public should see this report for what it is: a blatant attempt to use this tragedy for political gain."
EPA spokeswoman Cynthia Bergman said, "I think their report crosses the line."