posted November 01, 2004 12:03 PM            

Notwithstanding routine protestations to the contrary, America’s mainstream media is 'jonesing' to undermine a President in wartime, and collude with leftists to assist a candidate who not only gave aid and comfort to the enemy 30 years ago, but was also their pawn.

New, documented archive evidence proves that John Kerry was either a knowing co-conspirator with the communist Vietnamese (while he was still subject to the Uniform Code of Military Justice), OR he was a “useful idiot”. Regardless of which of the available options is true, he is certainly ‘Unfit for Command’... at ANY level.
CBS was quick (premature articulation?) to pick at a phony scab sparked by fabricated documents. Political and personal bias synthesized to conspire with CBS to create a critical self-inflicted wound. Dan Rather says, ‘Whoops!’... kinda.

The New York Times (reportedly beating CBS to the punch) splashed a bogus story about 380 tons of missing Iraqi munitions. When NBC and an Army officer directly involved refute the bogus claim, the graying lady looks at her shoes (possibly seeing the reflection of Jason Blair) and shuffles her feet.

Meanwhile, a for-real blockbuster story languishes beyond the view or attention of most Americans because ‘it might be too controversial and influence the election’? Huh?

I recently interviewed Dr. Jerome Corsi (co-author of ‘Unfit for Command’) and Scott Swett (founder of www.wintersoldier.com ) and learned they can’t get ANY big time media (including the presumed defenders of the truth at Fox News) to touch the product of their documented research.

Et tu Rupert? Maybe Fox was too busy with lawyers and cost benefit analysis of protecting their Marquee product ... or have finally become intimidated by name callers?

Regardless of the reason, Fox News is as guilty of this sin of omission as the mainstream media they routinely vilify.

Newly discovered documents (hiding in the ocean of data in archives) reveal a very direct and symbiotic link between John Kerry and the Vietnamese communists. No wonder the POW community is outraged (www.stolenhonor.com).

This stuff ‘should’ overshadow

Questions about Kerry’s hyperbolized daring do in Vietnam
His ‘revised’ DD 214
His multiple Silver Star citations
His alleged less than honorable discharge and subsequent Carter/Clinton do-over…
Or even his billionaire heiress du jour’s piles of money and abrasive verbiage.
This is HOT ... and the media (even the once dependable Fox News) is too chicken excrement/scared spitless to even try to discredit it?

The documents from 1971 were found in the Texas Tech Vietnam archives in Lubbock, Texas.

They reveal the Vietnamese communists were not just ‘talking’ but were in fact guiding and directing the American antiwar movement. They used meetings in Paris between their delegation to the Paris Peace talks and American antiwar activists to direct (not advise) efforts in the U.S.

In the summer of 1970 John Kerry reportedly met with Madame Binh, the Viet Cong’s chief negotiator in Paris. Kerry subsequently returned to the U.S. to push for Madame Binh’s ‘7-Point Peace Plan’. He made his pitch in Washington. D.C. in July 1971.

Kerry didn’t use the Binh 7-Point Plan as a ‘guideline’ for his recommendations, he used (and implemented it) as an Operations Order, complete with Surrender, Admission of Guilt, Reparations, the whole megillah. http://ice.he.net/~freepnet/kerry/staticpages/index.php?page=puppets.

Everything Madame Binh instructed Kerry to do, he DID. He did so either as a complicit co-conspirator, or as a ‘useful idiot’ ... you decide.

CBS, CNN, The New York Times et al seem to have to compunction about reporting on fabricated urban legends if or when it is in consonance with their preconceived views, opinions and prejudices. However, if or when corroborated documentation, which is irrefutable, emerges that undermines their biased agenda, the silence is deafening.

Corsi and Swett have tried to share the details and documentation of the story with EVERYONE in the media…and with the exception of some talk radio and Internet venues... this story is anathema. Why?

PLEASE check out www.wintersoldier.com for the documentation and contact everyone you can to ask WHY is this significant information being denied the American people?

Ask: CBS evening@cbsnews.com
NBC nightly@nbc.com
ABC peterjennings@abc.com
CNN www.cnn.com/feedback
FOX hannity@foxnews.com
oreilly@foxnews.com
MSNBC joe@msnbc.com
imus@msnbc.com
The New York Times executive-editor@nytimes.com
managing-editor@nytimes.com
The Washington Post ombudsman@washpost.com

posted November 01, 2004 01:37 PM              

Jwhop, being "objective instead of subjective" as he is, instead of looking at things that are coming out of his own Republican party about Bush, hangs onto Newsmax and the neo-conservative propaganda attack machines for comfort. Because he is so very afraid that he just might be wrong.

Any true American patriot would take other things said about Bush into consideration because their first love is democracy and the Constitution above blind allegiance to a leader. I'm happy to see that there still remains within the Republican party, the Grand Old Party, people who do love this country, democracy and the Constitution above all else and are coming out and speaking against the Bush regime. God bless them and their loyalty to democracy.

posted November 03, 2004 03:38 PM            

This is the same media who fed viewers a steady diet of exit polls showing that Kerry was going to win by a landslide.

We know the entire intent was to suppress the Republican vote...why go to the polls, it's inevitable Kerry is going to win...we're telling you so.

Problem, those exit polls were from large inner city precincts and weighted 60% towards women voters.

Another press lie designed to get Kerry elected.

Wednesday, Nov. 3, 2004 12:18 a.m. EST
Democrat Media Still Refuse to Admit Bush's Victory

Laugh of the year: Even after Sen. John Kerry conceded to President Bush, his media allies are refusing to call the race!

As of this writing, CNN's Web site shows Bush with only 254 electoral votes and not taking Ohio. Ditto ABC "News," though Dan Rather's CBS finally had to break down and join Fox News Channel and MSNBC in reporting reality.