posted May 11, 2006 11:19 PM            

Don't Let 'Moderate' Hillary Fool You
by Kathleen Willey, Candice E. Jackson, and Juanita Broaddrick
Posted May 11, 2006

Hillary Clinton weighed in on the immigration reform debate recently by accusing the House Republicans of passing a bill that would “criminalize the Good Samaritan and probably even Jesus himself.” Hillary also opined that the House bill “flew in the face” of Republicans’ stated support for faith and values.

Hillary eagerly pounces on her political opponents’ supposed betrayal of their values, but what about her values? Far from walking in the footsteps of the Good Samaritan or “Jesus himself,” Hillary has consistently revealed a personal and political character the core values of which are ruthlessness, unbounding arrogance and endless ambition.

One of us had the surreal experience of being confronted by Hillary -- self-declared feminist and champion of “women’s rights” -- as she protected her husband Bill against the charge of rape. Another of us worked with the Clintons prior to being sexually assaulted by Bill Clinton, and witnessed her dismissive, contemptuous interactions with others whenever the cameras weren’t present. Our experience of Hillary Clinton as ruthless and vindictive is validated in a newly released book, “I’ve Always Been a Yankees Fan: Hillary Clinton in Her Own Words,” by Tom Kuiper.

“I’ve Always Been a Yankees Fan” is a collection of quotes -- hundreds of them -- by and about Hillary Clinton, spanning her entire life and career, complete with pictures, captions and humorous but spot-on commentary. The quotes show a crass, insensitive side of Hillary, and in the foreword Dick Morris writes of this “wonderful little book” that “No politician could possibly amass quotes like this and expect to run for office. Nobody would dare.” Hillary Clinton, however, possesses an extraordinary level of arrogance (even for a politician), and expects to claw her way back to the White House despite being called out for her despicable attitudes and statements.

Our perception of Hillary, one shared by Tom Kuiper and Dick Morris, stands in stark contrast to the one touted by feminist legal scholar and author Susan Estrich. In her recent book, Estrich opines that Hillary can and should be elected the first female president. Estrich writes, “I think that Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton, soon-to-be second-term senator from New York, centrist Democrat, strong on security, tough, moderate, family values, middle-aged, qualified, managed by Bill Clinton, is the next president of the United States.” Moderate? Family values? Kuiper’s new book goes a long way toward discrediting the version of Hillary Clinton that permitted her to launch her own political career, and on which she hopes to ascend to the presidency in 2008.

For example, Kuiper quotes multi-millionaire Hillary opining that “The unfettered free market has been the most radically disruptive force in American life in the last generation.” It is difficult to discern any moderation in that statement. Or in this response by Hillary to a constituent who expressed concern over being forced into a government-run health-care plan: “It’s time to put the common good, the national interest, ahead of individuals.” Or in this explanation to wealthy donors regarding her support for repealing the Bush tax cuts: “Many of you are well enough off that [the] tax cuts may have helped you. We’re saying that for America to get back on track, we’re probably going to cut that short and not give it to you. We’re going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good.”

How about Hillary’s supposed support for family values, which should include justice for abused women and children? “I’ve Always Been a Yankees Fan” presents Hillary publicly announcing, “I am proud that my husband has stood up as president to confront the violence and to protect American women.” But Kuiper also accurately recounts how Hillary privately revealed a complete lack of concern for “protecting women against violence” when she asked to meet Juanita Broaddrick just weeks after Juanita had been raped by Bill Clinton. Hillary was willing to do whatever it took to prevent Juanita from holding her husband accountable for an unspeakable act of violence.

Kuiper also quotes Hillary Clinton as saying of the many women who have reported having sexual encounters with Bill Clinton (forced or otherwise): “These women are all trash. Nobody’s going to believe them.” This is hardly how “Jesus himself” would respond to women reporting what often amounted to sexual mistreatment, and we doubt that He would “crucify” Gennifer Flowers for daring to disclose her affair with Hillary’s husband -- even though Bill Clinton himself eventually admitted under oath to having the affair with Flowers. Hillary professes to be “a voice for America’s children,” yet at an event with preschoolers at the governor’s mansion as first lady of Arkansas Mother Clinton was overheard on the intercom system saying, “I want to get this s--- over with and get these damn people out of here.” Hillary has not demonstrated a consistent track record of treating women and children -- at least children not her own -- with care and concern. She was certainly quick enough to demand that taxpayers fund a pool for the governor’s mansion while first “lady” of Arkansas.

Hillary invariably relies on the maxim “the best defense is a good offense” to deflect attention from her own wrongdoing. She refuses to address or apologize for the statements -- many of them vulgar and outrageous -- that Tom Kuiper has painstakingly assembled, but she audaciously continues to malign others for supposedly failing to act on “faith” and “values.” Based on our personal experiences with Hillary Clinton, we encourage others to explore the true nature of this woman through Kuiper’s entertaining but revealing book before throwing political support to Hillary on the misguided impression that she is the moderate, family-values candidate she wants you to think she is.

Mrs. Willey is a Virginia businesswoman and former White House volunteer who was allegedly sexually assaulted by Clinton in 1993.

Ms. Jackson is an attorney, rape survivor, and author of "Their Lives: The Women Targeted by the Clinton Machine."

posted May 11, 2006 11:31 PM            

The authors are touring the Clinton Presidential Library today to send a message that women don’t need to keep silent about sexual assault.

Like far too many women in this country, all three of us have experienced the crime of sexual assault and the violation of sexual harassment by men in powerful positions.

Each of us has battled with the shame, humiliation, and fear of coming forward to report the assault. Each of us has worried about how this sexual harassment and assault will affect our careers. Two of us, however, suffered this kind of experience at the hands of a United States President.

That President has never apologized for his vicious behavior toward us. That President and his wife orchestrated frightening, retaliatory intimidation tactics against us for daring to tell the truth about the assaults against us. That President and his wife are held in high esteem by world leaders and much of the American public. Because of this, Bill and Hillary Clinton continue to teach important lessons to victims and perpetrators of violence against women in this country.

The Clintons are teaching rape and sexual harassment victims that if your assailant is popular and politically powerful, you will be punished more for daring to report the assault than for keeping silent. They are teaching perpetrators of violence against women that as long as you are pro-abortion enough to have the political support of the National Organization for Women, any crimes you commit against women in your “personal life” will be overlooked.

When we announced that we were planning to tour the Clinton Presidential Library in Little Rock, Ark., last Wednesday, we were asked by friends, family, the press and the public: Why do you keep dragging this issue up? Why can’t you just let it go?

The Clinton Library is a multimillion-dollar monument to the legacy of our 42nd President. Part of that legacy is being erased. Part of the real Clinton legacy is the cruel abuse that he and his inner circle committed against us. If we let it go, what does that say to the thousands of women victimized by sexual harassment and assault?

Unless we have the courage to ask the American people to hold the Clintons accountable for their abuses against us, we are part of the problem rather than part of the solution. The problem of abuse against women is far too serious for us to sit quietly by while Bill and Hillary Clinton whitewash their reputations and escape all consequences for their actions.

Harassment and assault must be denounced no matter the status of victim or perpetrator. But harassment and assault committed by our leaders must be censored even more vigorously because these luminaries set the standards for acceptable behavior in our society. Bill Clinton’s sexual assaults against us, and Hillary Clinton’s active participation in persuading America that those assaults don’t matter, represent a breach of the trust we should place in our leaders.

This is not a political vendetta on our part. The two of us assaulted by Bill Clinton were political supporters of the Clintons until Bill Clinton attacked us. This is about the truth, and the sad truth is that the Clintons have exhibited such callous treatment of women that they do not deserve our respect or our votes. Whether or not you agree with the Clintons’ political positions, there are certainly other politicians who hold similar positions but who actually treat women with dignity and respect. It’s time for us to take abuse against women seriously, and that requires that we demand proper treatment of women from those in positions of power.

Our stories are on record, in painful detail. The Clintons have never even bothered to present any reasons why you should believe their denials and evasions regarding our accusations. They prefer to hope that we will let it go, and that all of us will move on and forget about their despicable behavior. We will not let it go. For the sake of women everywhere whose lives are torn apart after being assaulted by powerful men, we will continue to press the Clintons to face up to the damage they have caused.

Ms. Broaddrick is an Arkansas businesswoman and former "Clinton for Governor" supporter who was allegedly raped by Bill Clinton in 1978.

Ms. Jackson is an attorney, rape survivor, and author of "Their Lives: The Women Targeted by the Clinton Machine."

Mrs. Willey is a Virginia businesswoman and former White House volunteer who was allegedly sexually assaulted by Clinton in 1993.
http://www.humaneventsonline.com/article.php?id=9882

Not to worry, we won't forget. We have a million questions for Hillary...should she decide to run for President. Questions about bribery, fraud, obstruction of justice, intimidation, abuse of power in the use of federal agencies...you know, just the common every day, run of the mill questions the answers to which..."that's old news"....aren't going to fly.

posted May 12, 2006 12:44 AM              

she signed a sworn affadavit saying clinton didnt assualt her......so she's a perjuror, a liar, or both....very credible....

3 weeks after the alleged rape she attended a clinton fundraiser......???

of course she did tell her story at the time....to a man she was having an affair with behind her husbands back.....but you cant blame her for that when she said in divorce court that the husband had punched her in the mouth......
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/clinton/stories/broaddrick0225 99.htm

*******

so yes, i'd say juanita is about as credible as you jwhop.....

quote:

---

Really, I've seen the pictures taken of Juanita's face..I believe..the day after the rape.--jwhop

BTW, about that picture of Juanita; it's been a while but I think it was posted on an anti-Clinton site. It was pretty gruesome.--jwhop

Hmmm, that's no lie Petron. I did see a photo represented to be that of Juanita Broaddrick..shortly after she was raped and it wasn't a pretty picture.--jwhop
http://www.linda-goodman.com/ubb/Forum16/HTML/001385.html

---

quote:

---

It’s important to note — and Broaddrick concedes — that aside from her, there are no witnesses and as far as we know, no one saw Clinton enter or leave Broaddrick’s room, or even the hotel. She took no photos, kept no evidence and the hotel has no records to confirm that she stayed there.
http://www.capitolhillblue.com/Feb1999/022599/datelinetranscript022599.htm

---

posted May 12, 2006 01:35 AM              

quote:

---

Hillary Clinton, however, possesses an extraordinary level of arrogance (even for a politician),

---

There is no way possible that Hillary Clinton could be more arrogant than Donald Rumsfeld, Dick Cheney, G.W. Bush, Conda-what-its Rice and Karl Rove. They just can't make em more arrogant than that bunch. As far as being a "ruthless" woman Rice has cornered the market on that label.

Jwhop, you really need to get over this Bill and Hillary Clinton fixation that you have and move on with your life. Bill Clinton isn't president any longer, Jwhop. At best Hillary Clinton could get nominated for Vice President but even that is doubtful for 2008.

posted May 12, 2006 10:54 AM            

Why should I get over Bill and Hill...Hill who wants very badly to be President...Hill who has a past of lying, obstruction of justice, bribery, intimidation and fraud?

posted May 12, 2006 02:14 PM            

I am disgusted by both of you right now concerning your responses. We sat here while jerks defended women that made allegations (without proof) against Arnold S while he was running for governor of CA... YET... here we have valid cases of RAPE and people have the nerve to do what every f*cking small minded jerk off does to women that come forward after rape "Rape the women again"

I suggest you both take a good look at the sites that serve women that have been raped. Maybe even sit down and talk to a survivor of rape and find out what goes through their heads and WHY it is so hard to report what happened.

Being scared crapless by someone in power is enough for ANYONE to file a false affidavit (God, I thought ANYONE that was PRONE to CONSPIRACY theories would be a bit more understanding the subversive methods those in POWER can use to scare people into NOT testifying or NOT filing a complaint).

Many Rape victims can't believe what has happened, especially date rape. Someone they trusted used their position, power or sheer physical dominance to take something sacred from them. Can you imagine your daughter, mother or sister being held down by your best male friend while he forced intercourse with her? Is that too graphic? Well, it gets worse folks.

Now imagine the shame afterwards as they look up crying at the person that just forced them.. but is it force when you know them. So, they pushed you a bit, smothered you with kisses, kept saying no you'll like it, how beautiful you look. Next thing you know they are moving off your pants, panties..etc... RAPE.. it's all the same.

The Shame is the worst. Tell people and you become a **** , of course you wanted it, the guy is charismatic, handsome, powerful. He could get anyone, why would he rape you? One can only imagine the subsequent threats that followed - "now, you know you shouldn't say anything. No one will believe you, I am the governor / president / football player.. (name your guy) and you...well, you're hot, we all know your sexual and you wanted it"...

It's pathethic. We live in a world where Feminists demand equal pay, the right to a "mans" job, rights over our bodies - yet, when one is raped by a Liberal Icon, the blind eye is all that remains.

The worst is to see postings like 'well what was she doing at the fundraiser" on a site like this. Where is the compassion? Bet it would be a different story if it was about Bush. Hell, no one would even wait for evidence, instead they would have him tried and convicted on a rumor.

posted May 12, 2006 02:40 PM            

When Anita Hill accused Clarence Thomas of sexual misconduct, the left put up a united front in support of Anita Hill and attempted to obstruct his appointment to the US Supreme Court...on that issue.

"Women don't make stuff like that up" they all chanted in unison.

When Jennifer Flowers, Kathleen Willey, Paula Jones and later Juanita Broaddrick and others accused Clinton of sexual misconduct including rape, sexual assault and adultery, the left chanted in unison...they're "liars", "looking for a book deal", "controlled by the vast right wing conspiracy", "trailer trash".

Gone was the presumption that "women don't make stuff like that up".

posted May 12, 2006 06:10 PM              

by saying you saw a picture of juanita's face messed up taken the day after she was raped by clinton you make the case that there is evidence that it happened.....which is more than enuff to fool most the people reading this board.....

broaderick didnt sign that affadavit until twenty years after the fact.....its not like she was still in denial then.........

its the "right" who's appalling hypocricy is on display regularly here, and especially in this thread....when i posted information about an allegation of rape against bush jr.....where the alleged victim was eventually found with a bullet in her head...not a peep from you two.....just denial of the source.....

when i posted information about a child sex slave ring operated by republican lobbyists and patronized by figures all throughout the bush sr administration, with a victim placing bush sr at those parties......NOT A PEEP, other than more denial of the source.....

not to mention suggesting a lobotomy would cure cathy obrien .....ha ha ha very funny jwhop!!!

i know enough people who were raped as children to know that its NEVER consentual, so you can stop your sanctimonious feigned shock, claiming i'm "insensitive".....

posted May 12, 2006 06:46 PM            

Please feel free to post the link here. I do hope it isn't riddled with your artwork that basically IMPLIES something is occuring when it isn't. Or better -more tabloid fodder with someone claiming to have knowledge of someone that knew someone that was touched inappropriately.

Anytime I have seen real allegations of child molestation I have always come out swinging. Unlike other... what did you infer that I was.... oh yeah, Sanctimonious - people... I could care less if someone is Republican, Democrat, Priest or Pauper - rape and molestation is still a horrible thing- and if Bush was accused of such I would do my best to see him impeached and prosecuted.

posted May 12, 2006 06:53 PM              

ive only posted facts with links to the sources....ive made no judgements, except for judgements about the unsourceable b.s. that jwhop posts......

in those posts i even called clinton a dog and said he was probly involved in the child sex ring too.....i'm not the one with party blinders on, apparently you are

posted May 12, 2006 08:11 PM            

IF it's true and IF Bush Sr. did participate in child molestion then he should be prosecuted. Child molesters are the worst human beings on the planet.

I am surprised that with as much venom is in the media and how rabid the far left is, that we haven't seen more of this play out.

Hell, if this is true, this would BE the TIME to strike with Bush's numbers so LOW. My guess is that there is alot we don't know and most of what we do know is speculation.

posted May 12, 2006 08:17 PM              

too late pidaua....theyve already buried the loose ends and moved their party to a deeper darker cellar.....

like i said.....i dont need an indictment to NOT vote for someone.......

posted May 12, 2006 08:18 PM              

quote:

---

Yes, Cathy O'Brien is sick but it's nothing a well executed lobotomy wouldn't cure.

---

ain't exactly sympathetic to Margie either.

posted May 13, 2006 02:02 AM              

quote:

---

Yes, Cathy O'Brien is sick but it's nothing a well executed
lobotomy wouldn't cure.

---

Now here's a bit of coincidental irony.....

" CATHY knew she was being used for something evil...
....and was telling horrifying secrets from the past.....

.....her aunt a WEALTHY New Orleans matron was determined
to have Cathy drastically LOBOTOMIZED.....to excise the memory
of the incident....and the prevent the "mad ravings" from occuring...."

From SUDDENLY LAST SUMMER

I saw the similarity immediately!

The minute that I was aware that jwhop suggested a lobotomy
for Cathy O'Brien...

But of course!

How to prevent Cathy from spilling more beans?

Why a lobotomy, of course! (just like the Cathy from
SUDDENLY LAST SUMMER!)

That will shut her up!

posted May 14, 2006 06:27 PM              

.....have you, the shrubs, and cheney decided when Cathy gets her lobotomy?

Actually, it's kind of late for that now, as she
ALREADY blew the whistle on them.

....but of course, all the evil and corruption she reported knowing about, can't be addressed FOR REASONS OF NATIONAL SECURITY!

posted May 14, 2006 07:00 PM              

If they were missed the first time....I think it's important that they are
seen again....

From http://www.linda-goodman.com/ubb/Forum16/HTML/001909-3.html

**********************************************a question I answered for jwhop
...but heard no reply*******
*****************************************

To answer another question from jwhop....which is....

quote:

---

Why, if you are right, if you are alerting the American public about the outrageous mind control conspiracy..and others which circulate widely through the Internet and some radio shows...then how do you account for you and others not being parked in prison or mental institutions rotting your rears off?

---

For what?

Stating my opinion?

They don't work that way.

That would be infringing on my "freedom of speech," for all the world to see....

...besides...I'm small potatoes...one little voice crying in the wilderness....

I am NOT a 'whistle blower."

I am instead a messenger.

Whistle blowers ARE in danger, and some HAVE been 'knocked off!'
( i.e. hit. ) ...as well as those in power who have attempted to thwart
the progress of the NWO...

Can you say JFK? RKF? JFK JR? Paul Wellstone? William Cooper?
Shall I go on?

And why haven't Cathy and Mark been sued by all those mentioned
in the books as mind controllers, torturers, drug runners, murderers
and more?

I'll let Cathy tell you.....

quote:

---

Mark and I finally got our well documented book entitled TRANCE Formation of America published, complete with irrefutable graphic details which are in themselves evidence to present to Congress, all the factions of law enforcement including the FBI, CIA, DIA, DEA, TBI, NSA, ETC., all major news media groups, national and international human rights advocates, both American Psychological and Psychiatric Associations, the National Institute of Mental Health, and more....to no avail.

TRANCE thoroughly exposes many of the perpe-TRAITORS and their agenda replete with names which raises the question "why haven't we been sued?"

The obvious answer is that same "national security act" that continues to block our access to all avenues of justice and public exposure, also prevents these criminals from inevitabley bringing mind control to light through court procedures, an opportunity we would welcome.

---

From TRANCE Formation of America - 13th printing...on page 242
..part of the time line...

Cathy O'Brien and Mark Phillips ducked many attempts on their lives
(and are still on alert!)

posted May 14, 2006 07:02 PM              

****************

While we're on the subject.....I just wanted draw attention to a footnote
in ACCESS DENIED, also written by Cathy O'Brien and Mark Phillips....

It has do with George Bush Sr.'s "alleged" pedophelia....

Page 129....footnote 138....

posted May 14, 2006 07:05 PM              

****************

Oh yes....

There was the "whistle blower" who didn't get the chance to blow
the whistle.....

His name was Danny Casolaro....

He wound up "suicided."

Danny was a reporter getting ready to expose what he referred to
as "The Octopus" due to the different tentacles of corruption
emanating from the Executive Branch of the Pentagon.

He said "The Octopus' was the biggest story to ever break in this
country. He believed it would re-establish Constitiutional values
of truth and justice by exposing high level criminals.

But guess what?

Danny Casolaro was found dead in a motel bathtub with his wrists
cut.

A brief 'suicide note' was found in place of his "Octopus" manuscript.

Shortly before this happened, he called his brother to tell him he had
all the evidence. He was excited at the prospect of letting the world
know who and what was running our country.

A day that should have changed the world - but didn't....

Instead only one human being of no consequence found; his life
snuffed out...supposedly by his own hand...

Whistle blowers aren't all so lucky as Cathy and Mark...they were
fortunate enough to get the word out BEFORE they were murdered....

If they wind up dead now....we'll all know that is wasn't 'suicide' or
'an acident.'

*sigh*