posted July 29, 2006 04:57 AM              

I would say it's a pretty good reflection of how most of the people are feeling...

posted July 29, 2006 12:16 PM              

Right now an investigation is taking place in Congress as Bush really outdid himself by signing into a law a bill that did not even go through the House or Congress which is totally a violation of the Constitution. It usurps the branches of government. John Conyers and some other Senators have a law suit against Bush for this.

posted July 29, 2006 01:20 PM            

I've asked you numerous times to provide some evidence of wrongdoing by the President.

So far, your answer falls into the category of "everyone knows".

If everyone knows, then you should be able to spell the charges out in detail...and provide the evidence here that the charges are true.

posted July 31, 2006 05:58 PM            

Ta da.... you can vote again and again. We have 200 million people in the US and this online representation is only at less than 300,000 people.

Do that math and keep in mind that some total idiot wack nuts are the type that would vote and vote and vote again...

Huh Rainbow.. how many times did you vote?

Total BS.. again something completely laughable posted by a leftest as "fact"

LMAO... oh yes.. and this is what MSNBC says about it's own poll:

One week in the middle of the Clinton-Lewinsky scandal, more than 200,000 people took part in an MSNBC Live Vote that asked whether President Clinton should leave office. Seventy-three percent said yes. That same week, an NBC News-Wall Street Journal poll found that only 34 percent of about 2,000 people who were surveyed thought so.
To explain the vast gap in the numbers in this and other similar cases, it is necessary to look at the difference in the two kinds of surveys.

POLLS
Journalists use polls to gauge what the public is thinking. The most statistically accurate picture is captured by using a randomly selected sample of individuals within the group that is being targeted, typically adult Americans.

While a poll of 100 people will be more accurate than a poll of 10, studies have shown that accuracy begins to improve less at about 500 people and increases only a minor amount beyond 1,000 people.

So, in the case of that NBC-WSJ poll, only 2,005 adults were surveyed by the polling organizations of Peter D. Hart and Robert M. Teeter. The poll was conducted by telephone and had a margin of error of plus or minus 2.2 percentage points at the 95 percent confidence level. The confidence level means that if the same poll were conducted 100 times, each one randomly selecting the people polled, only five of the polls would be expected to yield results outside the margin of error.

Random selection of those polled is necessary to ensure a broad representation of the population at large. For example, a nationwide poll asking which NBA team is the best would likely yield a far different answer in Philadelphia than in Los Angeles. (And neither one would be a good sample of the population at large.)

In the NBC-WSJ survey, pollsters first randomly selected a number of geographic areas and then telephone numbers were generated in a way that allowed all numbers in those areas (both listed and unlisted) an equal chance to be called. Only one adult in each household was then selected to answer the poll.

While variation can occur depending on what questions are asked and how they are asked, similar questions tend to yield similar answers. One way to account for variation, however, is to ask the same question over a period of time.

ONLINE SURVEYS
In contrast, MSNBC's online surveys (Live Votes) may reflect the views of far more individuals, but they are not necessarily representative of the general population.

To begin with, the people who respond choose to do so — they are not randomly selected and asked to participate, but instead make the choice to read a story about a certain topic and then vote on a related question. There is thus no guarantee that the votes would reflect anything close to a statistical sample, even of MSNBC.com users: The participants in a Sports Live Vote and a Politics Live Vote may overlap, but each group is likely to be dominated by people with an interest in each particular area. In addition, while MSNBC.com’s Live Votes are designed to allow only one vote per user, someone who wants to vote more than once could simply use another computer or another Internet account.

According to Nielsen//NetRatings, nearly 75 percent or 204.3 million Americans had access to the Internet from home in early 2004. In contrast, more than 90 percent of Americans live in homes with a telephone.

This does not mean that Internet polling cannot be scientific. Harris Interactive, for example, has set up a system with checks and balances that allow it to use the Internet to obtain survey results comparable with more traditional methods.

But MSNBC’s Live Votes are not intended to be a scientific sample of national opinion. Instead, they are part of the same interactive dialogue that takes place in our online chat sessions: a way to share your views on the news with MSNBC writers and editors and with your fellow users. Let us know what you think.

------------------
The democratic world believes that it is not the terrorists that are to blame, but us. Us, the westerners.
WRONG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! And the sooner you eliminate this misconception from your minds, the better.
We are NOT to blame. It is the freaking terrorists and the freaking terrorists only!!!! They are the bad guys. They do not understand concepts like peace, democracy, and respect for human life. They are, pure and simPle, EVIL!!!!! Behind all their political manipulations, if you carefully look at the actions of these MONSTERS, they are EVIL!!

http://www.mideastweb.org/log/archives/00000489.htm

posted August 02, 2006 11:26 AM              

Francis McEvoy Speaking
Heres a clip from her site about Bush:

I heard several well known astrologers say before the last election that George Bush could not get elected because he had Sun and Saturn in Cancer in the 12th house. My response was "that is precisely why he will be elected!" The manner in which he came to the Presidency in a disputed election, and the "behind-the-scenes" manipulations that have caused many Americans to feel that he is not the real winner of that election, definitely reflect the power of that solar position. We have had several Presidents born with Sun in the 12th house, including Abraham Lincoln, Ulysses S. Grant, and Jimmy Carter. Abraham Lincoln was born as the Sun rose, as recorded in his aunt's journal, and his balsamic Capricorn Moon was also in the 12th. Lincoln was a deeply reflective man, largely self educated, and his interest in the occult was well known in his lifetime. But the charm and personal power of the man was also marked at an early age.

Here's the actual site: http://www.weathersage.com/vs/mcevoy/12thhouse.htm

------------------
Virgo Rising, Sagittarius Sun, Pisces Moon

posted August 02, 2006 11:54 AM            

A leader has to take the long view, use his best judgement, ignore the political nay-sayers and do the right thing.

Bill Clinton, Commander Corruption was the very definition of a weakling who stuck his head in the sand and ignored acts of war against the United States for the entire 8 years of his corrupt administration. Commander Corruption read every poll and reacted. That's not leadership, that's the hallmark of a totally unprincipled man who bends to every wind.

If Commander Corruption had done his job, there wouldn't have been a 9/11. If Commander Corruption had done his job, Saddam Hussein would have been gone from Iraq by 1996...at the latest. If Commander Corruption had done his job, he would have acted on the Joint Resolution of Congress which called for the removal of Saddam Hussein...in 1998.

If Commander Corruption had done his job, he would have acted on the 1996 Gore Report on Aviation Safety which would have prevented terrorists from hijacking 4 civilian aircraft and using them as flying bombs to attack the United States.

If Commander Corruption had done his job, he would have taken Sudan up on their offer...made at least 3 times to turn bin Laden and al-Qaeda leaders and their computers, documents and membership lists over to the United States...instead of simply expelling him from Sudan when he went to Afghanistan.

We're paying the price now for electing a weak parody of a president like Commander Corruption.

We avoided that same mistake when we rejected Algore and the traitor John Heinz Kerry as presidential candidates.