Lindaland
  Global Unity
  CDN PM gets Afghan mail

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   CDN PM gets Afghan mail
DayDreamer
unregistered
posted August 07, 2006 03:44 PM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
PM gets Afghan mail

Afghanistan mission prompting flood of letters, emails and calls from Canadians

Aug. 7, 2006. 07:30 AM
DEAN BEEBY
CANADIAN PRESS


OTTAWA—Afghanistan has become a lightning rod for thousands of ordinary Canadians who write or call Stephen Harper, newly released documents show.

Records of telephone calls, letters and emails to the Prime Minister in the four months since he took office Feb. 6 suggest the military mission is turning into a political quagmire for the minority government. In May, for example, Harper's office received 1,453 letters and emails about Canada's Afghan deployment, two-thirds of them calling on the government to pull out and get the troops home. Another 114 telephone callers said the same.

The mission in Kandahar by far eclipsed any other issue that month, according to an internal analysis obtained under the Access to Information Act.

It was similar in April, when 1,805 pieces of correspondence and another 422 telephone calls dealt with Afghanistan-related issues.

Most criticized the government's decision not to lower flags on Parliament Hill to honour fallen soldiers, and there was vocal opposition to the mission itself. Almost 200 callers said the media should not be banned from reporting the return of the bodies of soldiers.

Again, Afghanistan dominated as the top issue that month when measured by the volume of correspondence.

The released analyses paint a picture of deepening concern about Canada's increasingly bloody engagement on the other side of the world, where at least 24 soldiers have died, including five in the last week.

In the month after Harper was sworn in, Afghanistan was barely on the radar of Canadians who tried to contact the Prime Minister, according to the analysis provided by the Privy Council Office.

In February, there was a slew of congratulatory messages for the new prime minister, and a smattering of correspondence on child care, the seal hunt, gun control and other matters.

The hottest topic among telephone callers was David Emerson, who defected from the Liberals to become Harper's trade minister.

"Callers would like him to resign and run in a byelection," says a report, citing 73 such calls.

But by March, Afghanistan had become the second most frequently mentioned subject, after the seal hunt, with 848 letters and emails.

"The large majority of writers criticiz(ed) the deployment of Canadian Forces to the region, and call(ed) for their return to Canada."

Another 121 people who picked up the telephone in March mentioned Afghanistan. "Callers were generally opposed to the sending of Canadian soldiers to Afghanistan."

The Prime Minister's mailbag and phone logs are decidedly unscientific samples of opinion, though three dozen bureaucrats are employed full time to wade through some 2 million items each year and categorize them by subject.

Their analyses carefully exclude so-called write-in campaigns, which use form letters and email templates to flood politicians with standardized messages.

Instead, staff focus on emails, letters and telephone calls that appear to be spontaneous and individual.

The emphasis on Afghanistan contrasts sharply with then-prime minister Paul Martin's mailbag in 2005, where the subject was hardly mentioned. Instead, same-sex marriage was last year's hottest topic.

The new concern about Afghanistan is also reflected in recent polls. A survey last month by Strategic Counsel suggested 56 per cent of Canadians opposed the Kandahar mission, up 15 percentage points from March.

Harper's office did not respond when asked whether the Prime Minister read any of this correspondence or is briefed on it regularly.

IP: Logged

lioneye68
unregistered
posted August 08, 2006 02:52 PM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I'm not surprised at all by this, in light of the escalating violence in the M.E..

It's no secret that the average westerner is a notoriously weak-stomached chicken sh*t. They'd be much happier to completely stay out of all and any conflicts, even if specifially targetted by a hostile party.

That's why the death-cults have the upper hand over the west. The west are cowards who cut and run as fast as they can whenever their side experience a loss of life. At least, that's the reputation we have. And it's not completely unfounded either. Clearly, more than half of the population fits this description, by reacting in strong critisism of the very fact that their country is even involved in the conflict. They don't care what the issue really is. It's never important enough to them to put their countrymen's lives at risk. They disquise it as moral superiority, but really it's just cowardice. This is a serious weakness indeed, our achilles heel, if you will - and the enemies of the west KNOW IT.

IP: Logged

Venusian Love
unregistered
posted August 08, 2006 07:46 PM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I could have sworn I saw him once on tv smoking some weed.

A few years back maybe.

Not sure if it was him though.


IP: Logged

All times are Eastern Standard Time

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | Linda-Goodman.com

Copyright © 2011

Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.46a