Lindaland
  Global Unity
  Democrats, Bankrupt Ideas and Irrelevant

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Democrats, Bankrupt Ideas and Irrelevant
jwhop
Knowflake

Posts: 2787
From: Madeira Beach, FL USA
Registered: Apr 2009

posted August 15, 2006 07:30 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for jwhop     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Stuck in permanent screech mode with side orders of treason and surrender, these far left politicians and their useful idiot followers haven't had a new idea in 40 years.

They play the race card
They play the victim card
They play the class warfare card
They play the hate card
They play the surrender card

Same plan, different era but some things never change.

Democrats have become irrelevant in America. They can't lead, they won't follow and they won't get the hell out of the way so the adults can get the job done.

Now, the crazies of the far radical left...which is about all that's left of the once proud democrat party...have attempted to throw one of the only liberals left in the Congress out into the street.

A better plan for America is to reach out in the coming election, grab the radical leftists in Congress and throw them out of office.

They're not part of the solution to any of Americas' problems. They are the main problem.

Fantasyland in Connecticut
Posted: August 15, 2006
1:00 a.m. Eastern


Star Parker

The executive director of MoveOn Political Action Committee did a victory dance on the opinion page of the Washington Post. He called Ned Lamont's defeat of Sen. Joe Lieberman in the Connecticut primary a "watershed moment" and Lamont's "principled progressivism" the "bold" new direction for the country.

But as is clear today, in the wake of the massive terrorist plot uncovered in London, had the primary been held a week later, Lamont would be history. Even detached Connecticut Democrats would have remembered that it was the terrorists of 9-11 that defined our "watershed moment," not a rich Northeastern dilettante.

Consider Lamont's victory speech, him standing up there flanked by the Revs. Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton. That visual alone was sufficient to tell us that what had occurred in Connecticut was a quirky flight from reality and not a defining moment in U.S. history.


The big theme of the contest was Iraq – foreign policy.

Exactly one year ago, last August, as Hurricane Katrina was thundering toward New Orleans, Jesse Jackson was in Venezuela embracing and singing the praises of President Hugo Chavez, whom even rock star Bono called a "power-hungry tyrant."

The following month, Jackson appeared along with Chavez in New York City, holding him and his country up as an example the United States should follow.

"(The Venezuelan) government's priorities are to invest in its people. They subsidize oil, gas, health care and education, and that's civil. We cannot subsidize our oil and education because we are investing in tax cuts for the wealthy and a war that does not make sense in Iraq. We need new values; we need to go another way."

Freedom House, a highly respected, non-partisan organization that promotes democracy and freedom around the world, ranks countries on a scale of 1 to 7, 1 being most free. The United States ranks 1. Venezuela ranks 4.

Freedom House also ranks countries by press freedom. Out of 194 countries ranked (No. 1 being most free), the United States is 17, Venezuela 158.

Chavez recently visited Iran, embraced their maniac president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, and equated Israelis to Nazis.

This gives us some idea of Jesse Jackson's global vision, which, given his prominence on the stage with Lamont, gives us some sense of where Lamont is coming from.

This defines where Americans want to go? You've got to be kidding.

The Jackson-Sharpton team-up also tells us something. There never has been much love lost between the two. Jackson, you might recall, refused to endorse Sharpton's presidential bid in 2004.

However, the two leaders pair up now because the far left, where they sow their oats, and where, of course, Ned Lamont and MoveOn.org think this country wants to go, is losing, not gaining, ground.

For increasing numbers of blacks, the Lamont-MoveOn-Jackson-Sharpton far left message is all "been there, done that." Black America is moving away from, not toward, this.

When Jackson ran for president in 1984 and 1988, he made inroads. In 1984, he won five primaries; in 1988, he won 11. By contrast, Sharpton, in his pathetic campaign in 2004, garnered a grand total of 26 delegates, 1 percent of what's needed for nomination. He couldn't even get 10 percent of the vote in South Carolina, where Jackson was victorious, with its heavy concentration of black voters.

The title of a new book by National Public Radio journalist Juan Williams, not exactly one of the names that gets dropped when folks talk about black conservatives, sums up the state of affairs: "Enough: The Phony Leaders, Dead-End Movements and Culture of Failure That Are Undermining Black America – And What We Can Do About It."

Michael Barone of U.S. News & World Report points out that Lieberman captured the vote in cities across Connecticut, such as Stamford, where "there are still sizeable blue-collar and black communities." These are what Barone calls the "lunch bucket working class," who can't afford to lose touch with reality.

I've been writing for years about the need for a viable Democratic Party. The success and future of this country depends on solid debate and exchange of real ideas.

This is exactly what we are not getting and what is driving much of the voter dissatisfaction that we're seeing in the polls. There is just so long we can go on with only one party generating ideas and the other saying "No."

The Connecticut primary amounted to a dangerous retreat into fantasyland, not a steppingstone for the future. It's in the interest of the nation and of the Republican Party that an empty, bankrupt Democratic Party get its act together.
http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=51523

IP: Logged

jwhop
Knowflake

Posts: 2787
From: Madeira Beach, FL USA
Registered: Apr 2009

posted August 16, 2006 01:44 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for jwhop     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Representative of the intellectual dialogue coming out of the brain dead morons of the leftist democrat party.

This from Obama...considered to be one of the bright lights of the party and a possible Vice Presidential candidate...and in time, a Presidential candidate.


Sen. Barack Obama, the new democrat Superman

Only in the Twilight Zone.

IP: Logged

jwhop
Knowflake

Posts: 2787
From: Madeira Beach, FL USA
Registered: Apr 2009

posted August 16, 2006 01:55 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for jwhop     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

Obama Warns of Gas Guzzling Cars in Town Hall Meeting....and leaves the meeting in an SUV

Tue Aug 15 2006 21:47:08 ET

Illinois Senator Barack Obama warns citizens at his 50th Town Hall meeting about gas guzzling, WPSD-TV reports.

It was among many points made to the standing room only audience at the Metropolis Community Center. Obama spoke on everything from DC politics to global warming.

He says part of the blame for the world's higher temperatures rests on gas guzzling vehicles. Obama says consumers can make the difference by switching to higher mileage hybrids.

Today the Senator said, "It would save more energy, do more for the environment and create better world security than all the drilling we could do in Alaska."

"After the meeting... Obama left in a GMC Envoy after admitting to favoring SUV's himself," claimed local News Channel 6.

Justification:

MORE

Tommy Vietor, Senator Obama's press secretary, explains: "What Senator Obama has long advocated is the use of vehicles that are more fuel efficient, including but not exclusively hybrids.

"The vehicle senator obama travels in while in illinois is a Flexible Fuel Vehicle (FFV), which can run on e85, a blended fuel made of 85 percent ethanol.

"So he in fact was practicing what he preached at the town hall meeting in Metropolis yesterday when he said we must drive fewer gas-guzzling vehicles."

But it does not appear that GMC's Envoy is E85 ready.

But what if it had been an E-85 SUV?

It still would be the very same fuel guzzler...which was the thrust of what Obama was hectoring his audience against.


IP: Logged

All times are Eastern Standard Time

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | Linda-Goodman.com

Copyright © 2011

Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.46a