Lindaland
  Global Unity
  Ann Coulter, Terrorists Win

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Ann Coulter, Terrorists Win
jwhop
Knowflake

Posts: 2787
From: Madeira Beach, FL USA
Registered: Apr 2009

posted August 17, 2006 12:52 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for jwhop     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Terrorists win: Deodorant banned from airplanes
Posted: August 16, 2006
6:19 p.m. Eastern


Ann Coulter

Last week, British authorities arrested 24 members of a terrorist cell plotting to blow up about a dozen U.S.-bound planes simultaneously. As a result of those arrests, we learned:


Nothing being done by airport security since 9-11 would prevent a bomb from being brought onto an airplane; and

This terrorist plot – like all other terrorist plots – was stopped by ethnic profiling.
Last week marked the first official admission that everything government airport screeners have been doing until now is completely pointless – unless you're an airport security guard with a thing for women's undergarments, in which case it's been highly effective.

As we now know, all the ingredients necessary to blow up an airplane can be carried in small liquid containers. Airport security has not even been looking for small liquid containers. Judging from my personal experience, they seem to have been focusing on finding explosive devices inside women's brassieres.


After five years of submissively complying with bag checks, shoe checks and underwire bra checks, Americans have now been informed that the hell we've been going through at the airports (but which the president and members of Congress do not go through because they refuse to fly commercial air) has been a useless Kabuki theater.

The procedures that have wasted millions of hours of time cannot keep the most basic bomb materials off an airplane. This is like locking your windows to prevent burglaries, while leaving the front door wide open.

Airport security has been using metal detectors to confiscate sharp objects that could be turned into makeshift weapons, which could then be used by terrorists to commandeer control of a plane and fly it into a building.

Except the terrorists can't do that because we've seen that trick before.

After 9-11, airline passengers will never allow a half-dozen terrorists to take control of a plane again. Indeed, on 9-11, passengers on Flight 93 prevented terrorists who had already been given control of the plane from flying it into a building after hearing what had happened to the first three hijacked planes.

To pull off a 9-11-style attack now, literally half the passengers on the plane would have to be terrorists. (At least the airport screeners wouldn't have to worry about confiscating a lot of deodorants.)

I think a planeful of Arabs would attract attention – except from people who had recently completed a government training program teaching them not to notice anyone's appearance. Not even a group of liberal Democrats flying off to a Renaissance Weekend would stand for that.

The sole objective of airport security post-9/11 has been to accomplish the impossible – remove all sharp objects from a plane – to prevent an attack that won't ever happen again. (OK – well, that and finding out what color of lingerie Ann Coulter prefers.)

The plan seems to be to make flying so unpleasant that terrorists – like the people who write laws about airport security – will refuse to fly commercial air. On that theory, we could also keep terrorists off planes by forcing passengers to undergo root canal surgery before boarding, making them stand on their heads for an hour, or enacting an "all Whoopi Goldberg in-flight movie" policy.

What stopped last week's terrorist attack was ethnic profiling. We don't know the details of the British intelligence work that nabbed the 24 Muslims because the New York Times has not been able to obtain that classified information and publish it on its front page yet. But it is a fact that you could not catch 24 Muslim terrorists by surveilling everyone in Britain equally.

Without the ethnic profiling going on outside of airports, no security procedure currently permissible inside airports would have prevented a terrorist attack that would have left thousands dead.

Airplanes, ports, bridges, subways and shopping malls cannot ever be sanitized against every type of attack that can be dreamed up by fanatics engaged in asymmetrical warfare. We have to target the fanatics themselves. Baby formula doesn't kill people. Islamic fascists kill people.
http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=51563

IP: Logged

neptune5
unregistered
posted August 17, 2006 07:49 PM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Ann Coulter is definitely an author who makes a professional living exploiting the emotions and personal lives of families and wives of tragedy. Not someone who is familiar with Karma.

------------------
Virgo Rising, Sagittarius Sun, Pisces Moon

IP: Logged

Eleanore
Moderator

Posts: 112
From: Okinawa, Japan
Registered: Apr 2009

posted August 17, 2006 08:44 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Eleanore     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Sensitive issue here, though, in light of some of Ann Coulter's other pieces, this one seems very kind and sweet.

And maybe baby formula does kill people.


But, seriously, racial profiling is a very tough position to take a stand on, at least for me, because I can see both sides of the issue and neither one makes me very comfortable.

------------------
"To learn is to live, to study is to grow, and growth is the measurement of life. The mind must be taught to think, the heart to feel, and the hands to labor. When these have been educated to their highest point, then is the time to offer them to the service of their fellowman, not before." - Manly P. Hall

IP: Logged

pidaua
Knowflake

Posts: 67
From: Back in AZ with Bear the Leo
Registered: Apr 2009

posted August 17, 2006 08:45 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for pidaua     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I like her. I know she can blunt at times and even cross the line, but her statements are always backed up with facts. Her first book explained why it is a Conservative has to back up their words and a liberal just screams "Bush Kills BABIES"

LOL..... but seriously, there are times when she makes me cringe.

I agree with her whole-heartedly in this article. The terrorists have affected us greatly and now we can even fly in peace. Women have to taste their breast milk in bottle or formula to prove it isn't deadly.

I am thankful that my job doesn't require me to fly as much and I would rather travel in my car than lose my luggage, not even be able to take a freaking book and sit on a plane twiddling my thumbs.

It's a sad world we live in

IP: Logged

All times are Eastern Standard Time

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | Linda-Goodman.com

Copyright © 2011

Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.46a