Lindaland
  Global Unity
  Rice confronted over Iran evidence

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Rice confronted over Iran evidence
Pluto's Muse
unregistered
posted February 11, 2007 08:17 PM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Rice confronted over Iran evidence



Rice said the US was not planning an attack
against Iran [EPA]
Condoleezza Rice, the US secretary of state, has been confronted in congress over the US administration's failure to provide firm evidence for Iran's alleged nuclear weapons development.

Ron Paul, a Republican congressman, said: "Unproven charges against Iran's nuclear intentions are eerily reminiscent of the false charges made against Iraq."

Paul said "unproven accusations of Iranian support for the Iraqi insurgency" were also serving as a pretext for "escalating our sharp rhetoric towards Iran".

"Pressed for proof of dramatic claims of Iranian involvement in Iraq, the administration keeps promising that they are compiling it."

'Echoes of Iraq'

Paul was speaking as Rice presented the US state department's annual budget request to the congressional foreign affairs committee on Capitol Hill in Washington on Wednesday.

Your Views
"We need to do everything possible to warm relations with Iran so as to avert an all out war in Eurasia....."

Bfar, Memphis, USA

Send us your views
He said: "This sounds like Iraq, where accusations came first and proof was supposed to come later – only that proof never came because the accusations turned out to be false."

Paul referred to discredited allegations that Saddam Hussein's government was building weapons of mass destruction.

US officials have promised to make public what Sean McCormack, a state department spokesman, described as a "mountain of evidence" to back up allegations about Iranian involvement in attacks on US and allied forces in Iraq.

No such evidence has yet been put forward by the administration.

'No Iran attack plan'

Rejecting Paul's suggestions, Rice said: "We are not planning or intending an attack on Iran.

"What we are doing is responding to a number of Iranian policies both in Iran and around the world that are actually quite dangerous for our national security."

"We're going to do this on our own timeline"

Sean McCormack, State Department spokesman
Rice also said that Iranian support for "terrorism" was "well known and well-understood", referring to Hezbollah in Lebanon and sectarian death squads in Iraq.

She said British forces in Iraq had also linked Iran to attacks on allied forces in the country, notably with sophisticated bombs able to penetrate armoured vehicles.

'No hurry'

Rice said: "I don't think any government in the world would stand by and not react to that."

McCormack rejected suggestions the administration had yet to reveal its proof of Iranian involvement in Iraq because the evidence was not strong enough to convince sceptics.

"We're going to do this on our own timeline," he said.

"There are always going to be doubters, critics, sceptics ... That's fine, we accept that."

"It's not going to influence us into hurrying through something that we don't think is ready or appropriate."

IP: Logged

neptune5
unregistered
posted February 13, 2007 04:24 PM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
you know what, i really think the US (us - we) should back off, just leave iran alone. Even though it doesn't seem possible now because of what were in. But it just doesn't make any sense to me, we've already have enough problems. Iraq's enough.

IP: Logged

All times are Eastern Standard Time

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | Linda-Goodman.com

Copyright © 2011

Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.46a