Author
|
Topic: 'I killed her because she was un-Islamic'
|
jwhop Knowflake Posts: 2787 From: Madeira Beach, FL USA Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted February 23, 2007 09:05 AM
'I killed her because she was un-Islamic' 22 Feb, 2007 LAHORE: Muhammad Sarwar, the killer of Pakistani Punjab's woman minister Zil-e-Huma, believes that women cannot rule over men. “I have no regrets. I killed her out of the conviction that she was leading an un-Islamic life and spreading an evil influence on other women,” Sarwar told interrogators in custody, according to a police source. Sarwar belongs to Ahle Hadith, a local religious vigilante group, and had allegedly killed four prostitutes in 2002, but was acquitted for want of evidence. He shot the young woman minister at her meet-the-public function, posing as a visitor last Monday. Sarwar was irked by her increasing popularity, sources in the Punjab Police told Daily Times Thursday. Police said that Sarwar has "his own interpretation of Islam". Sarwar told interrogators that he was fired by a passion to purge society of women who defy Islamic customs. Sarwar owns a hardware shop in Gujranwala and has nine children - four sons and five daughters. He had ordered his wife and daughters to stay at home and veil their faces. Slain minister Zil-e-Huma belonged to the ruling Pakistan Muslim League (Qaid), was related to Punjab Chief Minister Pervaiz Elahi and was a vocal supporter of President Pervez Musharraf's liberalization drive. Opposition to women seeking political office has been a recurring theme in Pakistan society. Sections of Islamic clergy had issued edicts against Benazir Bhutto when she became country's prime minister in 1988. http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/1658062.cms IP: Logged |
jwhop Knowflake Posts: 2787 From: Madeira Beach, FL USA Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted February 23, 2007 09:09 AM
Father killed family for being too western By Nigel Bunyan 22/02/2007 A father killed his wife and four daughters in their sleep because he could not bear them adopting a more westernised lifestyle, an inquest heard yesterday.Mohammed Riaz, 49, found it abhorrent that his eldest daughter wanted to be a fashion designer, and that she and her sisters were likely to reject the Muslim tradition of arranged marriages. On Hallowe'en last year he sprayed petrol throughout their terraced home in Accrington, Lancs, and set it alight. Caneze Riaz, 39, woke and tried to protect her three-year-old child, Hannah, who was sleeping with her, but was overcome by fumes. Her other daughters, Sayrah, 16, Sophia, 13, and Alisha, 10, died elsewhere in the house. Riaz, who had spent the evening drinking, set himself on fire and died two days later. Relatives broke the news to the couple's son, Adam, 17, as he lay terminally ill with cancer at the Christie Hospital, Manchester. He died six weeks later. Michael Singleton, the coroner, recorded verdicts that Riaz killed himself and that his victims were unlawfully killed. Riaz, who had spent all but the last 17 years of his life in the North West Frontier region of Pakistan, met his Anglo-Pakistani wife when her father sent her to the sub-continent to find a husband. After an arranged marriage, she developed a career as a community leader in Accrington while he, handicapped by a lack of English, took on a series of low-paid jobs. After Mrs Riaz's father died she "suddenly felt less beholden to Mohammed", a friend said. "She started to develop her own circle of friends and allowed the girls to express themselves in a more western way." She began to work with women who felt suppressed by Asian culture and many saw her as a role model for young Asian women. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/02/21/nmuslim21.xml IP: Logged |
alchemiest unregistered
|
posted February 23, 2007 01:45 PM
How odd... in the second story, the husband drank alcohol before killing himself... both against Islam, I believe? Very hypocritical of him... IP: Logged |
Johnny Newflake Posts: 0 From: Egypt Registered: Apr 2010
|
posted February 23, 2007 06:31 PM
It's interesting how religion draws so many crazies. Makes me wonder if maybe they invented it in the first place...IP: Logged |
DayDreamer unregistered
|
posted February 23, 2007 06:41 PM
This doesnt have to do with religion - It has to do with culture.My aunt from Lahore had a maid/servant who was killed because she ran away with her boyfriend and dishonoured her family. She was not Muslim. She was Christian. No matter, honour killing is criminal and a backwards cultural practice, not a religious one. People who practice this are not religious. Her father and older brother tracked her down from a village outside of Lahore, brought her home, and stabbed her to death with four different knives. Dont ask me what happened or didnt happen after her death. Im completely ashamed to have a Pakistani background because of it. IP: Logged |
Johnny Newflake Posts: 0 From: Egypt Registered: Apr 2010
|
posted February 23, 2007 07:08 PM
Hi, DayDreamer. Deja Vu much? IP: Logged |
DayDreamer unregistered
|
posted February 23, 2007 07:17 PM
Hi Johnny,lol, I thought it was just me...Cant help repeating my answers with a gem asc. Wonder what the excuse is for others...like yourself IP: Logged |
BornUnderDioscuri Moderator Posts: 49 From: Registered: Jun 2009
|
posted February 23, 2007 09:15 PM
quote: She was not Muslim. She was Christian. No matter, honour killing is criminal and a backwards cultural practice, not a religious one. People who practice this are not religious.
Very true. But quite often religion is used as an exuse for such behavior. And i agree with alchemist! Wtf he gets drunk and then claims they aren;t religious...psht IP: Logged |
Dulce Luna Newflake Posts: 7 From: The Asylum, NC Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted February 24, 2007 12:28 AM
Yeah, but it still has nothing to do with religion and everything to do with the perpetrators being deluded. One of the reasons I think so was because one of the perpetarators had drank alcohol afterwards which is considered against Islam. So who was he to judge how Islamic any of his family members actually were in the first place??? And also, I don't believe having an agenda against women (and therefore killing them if they do not behave as you want them to) is Islamic as well. One other thing: these were two very isolated incidents....meaning that You could do the same thing for domestic violence incidents here;but that would be ridiculous...no? Why do I sense a not-so-hidden-agenda here in this thread? One of the articles even point out to you that its not a religious practice but more to do with culture...which I'm sorry to say as well because like African culture, Asian culture is great but (as with every culture, actually) it has some things there that are not so great.
IP: Logged |
Johnny Newflake Posts: 0 From: Egypt Registered: Apr 2010
|
posted February 24, 2007 04:51 AM
quote: Wonder what the excuse is for others...like yourself
Ah, yes. I'm the head of the Department of Redundancy Department. Come to think of it, I think I've used that stupid joke here before, too. IP: Logged |
alchemiest unregistered
|
posted February 24, 2007 10:43 AM
Culture v. religion arguments are all great, but the fact remains that if you have psycho after psycho claiming some religion or the other as the driving factor for their creepy acts (and that's putting it mildly!), then obviously religion (at the very least, the way they practice or believe in their religion) has something to do with it. Religion is also one of the major forces that shapes culture, so the both of those terms are a lot more closely entwined than people would sometimes like to believe. Just some thoughts. IP: Logged |
Dulce Luna Newflake Posts: 7 From: The Asylum, NC Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted February 24, 2007 05:15 PM
quote: Culture v. religion arguments are all great, but the fact remains that if you have psycho after psycho claiming some religion or the other as the driving factor for their creepy acts (and that's putting it mildly!), then obviously religion (at the very least, the way they practice or believe in their religion) has something to do with it.
Well consider if that really makes sense seeing that had been pointed out above that there are people of a different religious denomination that have also committed such a heinous act. So in essence, not only are you implying that Islam condones this...but Christianity as well?? That makes no sense on either part of that argument. Yes, some of the whack-jobs use it as an excuse but it doesn't mean that it comes directly from religion. IP: Logged |
DayDreamer unregistered
|
posted February 24, 2007 05:36 PM
Dulce Luna"One of the articles even point out to you that its not a religious practice but more to do with culture...which I'm sorry to say as well because like African culture, Asian culture is great but (as with every culture, actually) it has some things there that are not so great." True Say! Oh Johnny no worries there are plenty of knowflakes swimming in circles here...yet not everyone has Pisces in their chart. Maybe we're all Pisces wannabes, or wannabes of Pisces that run departments of Redundancy???
Alchemist, yes religion does shape culture, as do other beliefs and practices. Im of the Dulce Luna's thinking: If we have a psycho claiming a religion as a reason for his actions than it shouldnt be the religion that countless others who are not psycho follow that is to blame. What or who should be to blame is the psycho with that psycho train of thought and ideas carrying out the psycho actions. IP: Logged |
jwhop Knowflake Posts: 2787 From: Madeira Beach, FL USA Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted February 24, 2007 06:48 PM
Police protect girls forced to convert to Islam Sir Ian Blair: Police and universities working together to tackle 'aggresive conversions'Extremist Muslims who force vulnerable teenage girls to convert to Islam are being targeted by police, Met chief Sir Ian Blair has revealed. Police are working with universities to clamp down on "aggressive conversions" during which girls are beaten up and forced to abandon university courses. The Hindu Forum of Britain claims hundreds of mostly Sikh and Hindu girls have been intimidated by Muslim men who take them out on dates before terrorising them until they convert. Sir Ian spoke about the problem at a conference organised by the forum. A Met spokesman said: "Neighbourhood officers work with university authorities in London and we would encourage anyone targeted in this way to seek help and support and where necessary use third party reporting facilities if they do not want to contact police directly." Ramesh Kallidai, of the Hindu Forum of Britain, said: "Some girls are petrified because they are constantly being phoned up, having their door knocked. "One girl was beaten up on the street and others have been forced to leave university." • Met police chiefs are to review a controversial stop-and-search power used in the fight against terrorism. Assistant commissioner Andy Hayman, the overall head of Britain's anti-terrorist operations, said he had concerns about the number of stops carried out in London using Section 44 legislation. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=437871&in_page_id=1770 IP: Logged |
Dulce Luna Newflake Posts: 7 From: The Asylum, NC Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted February 24, 2007 07:00 PM
quote: If we have a psycho claiming a religion as a reason for his actions than it shouldnt be the religion that countless others who are not psycho follow that is to blame. What or who should be to blame is the psycho with that psycho train of thought and ideas carrying out the psycho actions.
Yeah, and you think people would get it the first time.....otherwise this thread wouldn't be in existence (oh yeah, and I'm also getting a feeling of some Deja Vu here). Don't get me wrong, I'm for shedding light on humanrights issues in the world but it I smell a hidden agenda behind this thread.
And its not even just Islam; there's people who think that its the cool thing to do to bash organized religion in general which sucks because if one were to look throughout history, these religions came about at a time when there was chaos in the society around the respective prophets or leaders of the religion. The religions they brought served to improve and bring stability and order to the society around them. Fanatics wrongly interpeting relgions throughout history is sad because it is ruining the credibility of the religion. IP: Logged |
cancerrg unregistered
|
posted February 25, 2007 05:32 AM
:::Why do I sense a not-so-hidden-agenda here in this thread?::: Cos there isn't any thing hidden in here ! the word is 'Propganda ' . IP: Logged |
Dulce Luna Newflake Posts: 7 From: The Asylum, NC Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted February 25, 2007 10:51 AM
Oh yeah, thanks RG....that's the word I was looking for. IP: Logged |
cancerrg unregistered
|
posted February 25, 2007 01:50 PM
and well this is called 'cancer-cancer psychic connection '. IP: Logged |
jwhop Knowflake Posts: 2787 From: Madeira Beach, FL USA Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted February 25, 2007 03:09 PM
Propaganda...as in spreading of rumors?Propaganda...as in advocating for or against a cause? Which? Or, are you attempting to attack the credibility of the articles? Are you attempting to attack the facts...as laid out in the articles? As for me, I readily admit I'm against killing women..or anyone else because of their religion, lack of religious beliefs, or leaving a religion they formerly were associated with. I readily admit I'm against killing women or anyone else for that matter...who choose to adopt another culture. I readily admit I'm against forced conversion to another religion or religion in general by intimidation, death threats or any other means. I readily admit I'm against attempts to prevent one from changing religious beliefs by intimidation, death threats or murder as a tool to intimidate others who might also think about doing so. To civilized people, this would seem very basic. IP: Logged |
Dulce Luna Newflake Posts: 7 From: The Asylum, NC Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted February 25, 2007 04:04 PM
quote: and well this is called 'cancer-cancer psychic connection
Yes, you can't beat it either!
JWhop, your concern is really touching except I can't take it seriously because it seems more to me like Islamophobic-based propoganda.
IP: Logged |
jwhop Knowflake Posts: 2787 From: Madeira Beach, FL USA Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted February 25, 2007 04:46 PM
So DL, are you suggesting these topics are off limits to discussion?....or are you attempting to shift the argument to the issue of who is discussing the issue.Either way DL, you lose. These topics are topical, worthy of discussion and the truth remains the truth no matter who is discussing those truths. IP: Logged |
Xodian Moderator Posts: 275 From: Canada Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted February 25, 2007 04:52 PM
Jwhop what did ya expect? In the US, Normans have forced multiple marriages. Is not just limited to Islam; Extremist religious teachings spread to many other religions as well.Yes your view is propagandaish since it only highlights one religion yet no mention of others. IP: Logged |
lotusheartone unregistered
|
posted February 25, 2007 04:59 PM
if this truth is happening in other religions, please feel free to post such, Xodian!IP: Logged |
Xodian Moderator Posts: 275 From: Canada Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted February 25, 2007 05:06 PM
Christian chruch finally makes its move in 2006 to ban forced marriages. http://www.ekklesia.co.uk/content/news_syndication/article_06015marriage.shtml The same with the Islamic society of SA who BTW banned it all the way in 2004. Extremism happens in any religion and chirtianity isn't any different. IP: Logged |
jwhop Knowflake Posts: 2787 From: Madeira Beach, FL USA Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted February 25, 2007 05:18 PM
Well Xodian, I am well aware of the Normans. And I'm sure there were arranged marriages to keep the bloodline pure and thus a pathway to the thrones of Europe.However Xodian, I'm not aware of an American branch of the Normans or any attempt to force marriages upon the unwilling, by threats, intimidation or murder of the unwilling. In fact Xodian, there would be no point whatsoever to keep a bloodline pure...since our Constitution specifically forbids "Titles of Nobility" and rejects the concept in it's entirety. You might want to tie up some loose ends your post created and tell us how it relates to the topic of...forced conversions to a particular religion or forced acceptance of a religion or religion in general. IP: Logged |