posted May 24, 2007 02:30 AM              

Anybody that was brought up like MJ would turn out a bit odd if you ask me. He has had the world watching him since he can remember and lived an AMAZING life. HE has donated more money to charity and done more for kids that anyone in the history of this earth! (no joke!) So its so sad to see and hear what is happening to him.

posted May 24, 2007 03:04 AM              

If that sounds like normal behavior for an adult man to you guys, well, I don't even want to know what you consider abnormal behavior.

Just because he is famous and you like his singing you are willing to overlook and tolerate the sexual abuse of children by him? Who cares about the kids who are damaged for life. We like his singing so much we are willing to go into denial by saying it is only due to him being weird and famous that makes him a target.

How do you account for the fact that Elton John is equally as weird and famous yet has never been set up and accused of the sexual abuse of children? Not to mention all the other famous weird people? How come they haven't been targets?

My guess is that it might be due to the fact that they don't have little kids in their homes to whom they are not even related for sleep overs. So if MJ was falsely accused of sexually abusing children don't you think it might his fault and his actions that made him a target? Any adult that dumb should be a target.

posted May 24, 2007 03:08 AM            

I believe that no matter what a great artist or performer he is or was, the fact that he is a pedophile negates everything. The guy slept with children, he gave them alcohol and paid off parents.

The only difference between him and the sick pedophile in a trench coat is that he has money and had an amusement park. He was just better able to buy off those he hurt.

posted May 24, 2007 09:41 AM              

I don't care what his name lexigrams to be that does not make him any less a pediphile. He would not have paid his way out of the trial if he were not guilty.

I question the parents of those children accepting the money. If it were my child I would have refused it because my child is worth more than any amount of money. I would have forced the pervert to go to trial and see that justice was at least done for my child. Not that anything is going to erase the scars left on those children.

Set up indeed. You see, it's really warped that even with all the evidence in your face you are still in denial. Now the porn videos are being denied as having been planted there at his house due to jealousy. OMG.

You, without even knowing all the facts or it seems even caring to know them, go around saying he is not a pediphile just because you happen to like his music.

posted May 29, 2007 05:58 AM            

But MJ was found not guilty in a US court and you can't just dismiss that. Besides it's not for us to judge. (it would do no good)

My gut tells me there is NO WAY that kind of fiendship could ever exist with one of my own. I felt that way long before his problems became public.
Back when he was hanging out with Bubbles ewww.

Speaking astrologically, transiting Saturn is coming up to the conjunction with his Sun.
He should already be feeling the beginnings of Saturns restrictions and then later as Saturn gets closer (Sun) will come some heavy responsibility. (that includes for his actions)
And you know You can't bribe Saturn

Time to pay the piper.
He will be interesting to watch.

posted May 29, 2007 08:24 PM            

He was found not guilty. True. So was OJ.

Lexigram-wise his name would probably suggest he doesn't lie and is not in "sin" but would be accused of such. However, not everyone believes lexigrams have any merit, they certainly wouldn't hold up in court, and they can very well be colored by the person doing them, intentionally or not.

My only problem with this whole fiasco (aside from the obvious horror of child molestation) is the parents accepting the money to drop the charges. If anyone dared to lay an inappropriate hand on my child, no amount of money offered to me to just drop it would make me stop trying to have them brought to justice. No amount. That's like telling your kid, "hey, it's wrong for someone to sexually molest you ... unless they pay you a lot of money for it." It's not far from child prostitution, imo. And there's no way I'll believe that any decent parent would do such a thing. However, that doesn't mean there aren't horrible, greedy parents out there who'd do just that and these childrens parents may very well be those kinds of parents. Shame (at the very least) on MJ if he really did abuse those kids (we may never know the truth) but an equally nasty shame on their parents if their kids really were abused and the parents allowed their silence to be bought.

posted May 30, 2007 07:39 PM            

Um ... MJ?

I never said there was nothing wrong with him. I actually think he is quite disturbed. I also think it is highly likely that even if he did not actually physically molest these children (doubt due to the outcome of those charges) that there is possibly something in him that has at least caused him to consider it. That's my very unprofessional opinion.

However, the comment I made was regarding people drawing pictures of young children. You said

quote:

---

All I had to hear was that he was selling a picture he drew of a young boy.
Grown men dont draw pictures of young boys. They draw pictures of grown men if they're gay, or grown women if they're not. He's a pedophile.

---

posted May 31, 2007 02:49 AM              

It seems to me that any adult man who invites children for a "sleep over" is either just begging to be accused of misdeeds with those children or he is a bona fide pediphile. Either way the guy is a mental case. He also has an obsessive/compulsive need for more and more plastic surgery to the point he just plain looks freaky. It amounts to paid for self-multilation.

The police found closets full of pediphile type movies. Adults engaged in sexual acts with children. Of course here that has been said was possibly planted by the police out of jealousy because of course MJ denied that those closets full of videos were his. Im sure if the police were going to plant movies on him like that they wouldn't have taken them in his house in truck loads. LOL

This last case was not the first time MJ was accused of child molestation. He paid his way out those charges too.

Frankly I am making a judgment call about MJ's character based on his behavior and the evidence. I am however not condemning him and there is a vast difference between the two. I just think that if it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck it most probably is a duck.

posted June 01, 2007 05:26 PM            

As much as someone would call Chris Brown a Michael Jackson wannabe, I say he did a much better job bringing a lost style of pop and dance than the King of Pop himself. Sorry Mickey... Tight pants and groin grabs are gone with the times... Let the new blood show what its made of .

Here is a little clip from WMA... featuring Chris Brown and his tribute to Thiller.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-pz-w5PYRPc&mode=related&search=