Lindaland
  Global Unity
  Trials and Tribulations of Dr. Demento

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Trials and Tribulations of Dr. Demento
jwhop
Knowflake

Posts: 2787
From: Madeira Beach, FL USA
Registered: Apr 2009

posted September 13, 2007 01:28 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for jwhop     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Among the Doctor Dementos of the world is the leading light of leftist morons, George Soros. This demented loon is also the major contributor to move on dot org which ran a full page ad in the Treason Times slandering Gen. David Petraeus. This, before anyone knew the content of the report he was delivering to Congress.

So, who else would you expect to run such an ad if not the traitors at move on. And who else would you expect to take such an ad and give a whopping traitor discount to boot....if not the Treason Times?

TIMES GIVES LEFTIES A HEFTY DISCOUNT FOR 'BETRAY US' AD
By CHARLES HURT Bureau Chief MARKED DOWN


Sen. John Cornyn, at a Senate hearing on Tuesday, holds up an ad in The New York Times slamming Gen. David Petraeus. MoveOn.org got more than half off the regular price for the ad.September 13,


2007 -- WASHINGTON - The New York Times dramatically slashed its normal rates for a full-page advertisement for MoveOn.org's ad questioning the integrity of Gen. David Petraeus, the commander of U.S. forces in Iraq.

Headlined "Cooking the Books for the White House," the ad which ran in Monday's Times says Petraeus is "a military man constantly at war with the facts" and concluded - even before he testified before Congress - that "General Petraeus is likely to become General Betray Us."

According to Abbe Serphos, director of public relations for the Times, "the open rate for an ad of that size and type is $181,692."

A spokesman for MoveOn.org confirmed to The Post that the liberal activist group had paid only $65,000 for the ad - a reduction of more than $116,000 from the stated rate.

A Post reporter who called the Times advertising department yesterday without identifying himself was quoted a price of $167,000 for a full-page black-and-white ad on a Monday.

Serphos declined to confirm the price and refused to offer any inkling for why the paper would give MoveOn.org such a discounted price.

Citing the shared liberal bent of the group and the Times, one Republican aide on Capitol Hill speculated that it was the "family discount."

"I'm surprised they had to pay anything at all for the ad," the GOP staffer said. "They could have just asked the editorial page to run it and it wouldn't have cost them a cent."

http://www.nypost.com/seven/09132007/news/nationalnews/times_gives_lefties_a_hefty_di .htm

IP: Logged

Johnny
Newflake

Posts: 0
From: Egypt
Registered: Apr 2010

posted September 13, 2007 08:43 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Johnny     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
It's all shadowboxing. He's just another hypocrite oligarch like the rest of them.

Divide and conquer is the quintessential method by which the world is ruled. Democrats and Republicans, Left and Right, Black and White, etc. etc. etc. "War is Peace."

IP: Logged

jwhop
Knowflake

Posts: 2787
From: Madeira Beach, FL USA
Registered: Apr 2009

posted September 14, 2007 01:02 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for jwhop     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I disagree Johnny.

But since you seem to feel they're all cut from the same block of cheese and we're all caught in a gigantic conspiracy of tyranny by the so called elites, what do you suggest? Ignore them? Or kill them all?

You see Johnny, I ask only because you seem long on conspiracy theories but short on any solution to what you continue to express is a problem.

Since you feel this way then according to the dictates of common sense, it would be impossible to dislodge these elites from power by elections since they hold all the reins of power including the press and political parties.

IP: Logged

Johnny
Newflake

Posts: 0
From: Egypt
Registered: Apr 2010

posted September 14, 2007 10:16 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Johnny     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Since you feel this way then according to the dictates of common sense, it would be impossible to dislodge these elites from power by elections since they hold all the reins of power including the press and political parties.

You're exactly right, Jwhop. As soon as the American people got tired of being betrayed by Clinton, the Republicans are put into power, and now, after 8 years of having our civil liberties and Constitution eroded by the Bush administration, guess who we get in 2008? I find it strange that you disagree; how does Hillary differ in any appreciable way from President Bush? Will she put a stop to the trans-American superhighway and the NA Union? Will she disassemble the blatantly unconstitutional and unlawful income tax and Federal Reserve? Will she remove our troops from Iraq? What will be different?

Did you know Rupert Murdock (owner of Fox News) backs Hillary for 2008?

It's a two party system, and that is simply not choice. When the two parties are so overwhelmingly similar, how can you say that the inconsequential little media-battles played out between them are anything but shadowboxing for the benefit of the public?

I really don't know what there is that average citizens can do against the globalist NWO agenda, short of helping as many people as possible see what's going on under their noses. I certainly wouldn't advocate armed insurrection; don't need the FBI tapping into MY phones, thankyouverymuch. But I have a suspicion that the lack of any further psi-op 'terrorist' attacks in the US is due in no small part to the huge 9/11 Truth movement, and the slow realization of the people that these attacks are attempts at the manipulation of public opinion by those who have everything to gain by making us afraid and focusing us outward.

You know who Alex Jones is, right, Jwhop? Did you know he predicted 9/11 (or an upcoming false-flag attack involving the WTC and bin Laden, at least) in July, 2001, and urged his listeners to call Congress and tell them to stop the attack? He's studied the modus operandi of the globalists for more than a decade, and he saw it coming.

See for yourself. It's extremely eerie.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=_5ElXWJozEQ

There's an old joke about the two biggest problems with America being ignorance and apathy. I think, if we change that, we can save our country.

IP: Logged

jwhop
Knowflake

Posts: 2787
From: Madeira Beach, FL USA
Registered: Apr 2009

posted September 19, 2007 12:21 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for jwhop     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
heheh, they all sound like demented loons to me. Did anyone notice none of the other dememted loons..some running for president on the demented loon dem-o-scat ticket challenged move on dot org to clean up their act. Gee, it's only reasonable people who object to trashing military hereos with a chest full of combat ribbons...and 35 years of military service on behalf of America...and Americans.

And we're supposed to believe...for even one second...these demented loons love our US military women and men?

One would have to be totally demented to believe a word of that BS.

FROM THE HALLS OF MALIBU TO THE SHORES OF KENNEDY
September 12, 2007


Ann Coulter

Democrats claim Gen. David Petraeus' report to Congress on the surge was a put-up job with a pre-ordained conclusion. As if their response wasn't.

Democrats yearn for America to be defeated on the battlefield and oppose any use of the military -- except when they can find individual malcontents in the military willing to denounce the war and call for a humiliating retreat.

It's been the same naysaying from these people since before we even invaded Iraq -- despite the fact that their representatives in Congress voted in favor of that war.

Mark Bowden, author of "Black Hawk Down," warned Americans in the Aug. 30, 2002, Los Angeles Times of 60,000 to 100,000 dead American troops if we invaded Iraq -- comparing an Iraq war to Vietnam and a Russian battle in Chechnya. He said Iraqis would fight the Americans "tenaciously" and raised the prospect of Saddam using weapons of mass destruction against our troops, an attack on Israel "and possibly in the United States."

On Sept. 14, 2002, The New York Times' Frank Rich warned of another al-Qaida attack in the U.S. if we invaded Iraq, noting that since "major al-Qaida attacks are planned well in advance and have historically been separated by intervals of 12 to 24 months, we will find out how much we've been distracted soon enough."

This week makes it six years since a major al-Qaida attack. I guess we weren't distracted. But it looks like al-Qaida has been.

Weeks before the invasion, in March 2003, the Times' Nicholas Kristof warned in a couple of columns that if we invaded Iraq, "the Turks, Kurds, Iraqis and Americans will all end up fighting over the oil fields of Kirkuk or Mosul." He said: "The world has turned its back on the Kurds more times than I can count, and there are signs that we're planning to betray them again." He announced that "the United States is perceived as the world's newest Libya."

The day after we invaded, Kristof cited a Muslim scholar for the proposition that if Iraqis felt defeated, they would embrace Islamic fundamentalism.

We took Baghdad in about 17 days flat with amazingly few casualties. There were no al-Qaida attacks in America, no attacks on Israel, no invasion by Turkey, no attacks on our troops with chemical weapons, no ayatollahs running Iraq. We didn't turn our back on the Kurds. There were certainly not 100,000 dead American troops.

But liberals soon began raising yet more pointless quibbles. For most of 2003, they said the war was a failure because we hadn't captured Saddam Hussein. Then we captured Saddam, and Democratic presidential candidate Howard Dean complained that "the capture of Saddam has not made America safer." (On the other hand, Howard Dean's failure to be elected president definitely made America safer.)

Next, liberals said the war was a failure because we hadn't captured Abu Musab al-Zarqawi. Then we killed al-Zarqawi and a half-dozen of his aides in an air raid. Then they said the war was a failure because ... you get the picture.

The Democrats' current talking point is that "there can be no military solution in Iraq without a political solution." But back when we were imposing a political solution, Democrats' talking point was that there could be no political solution without a military solution.

They said the first Iraqi election, scheduled for January 2005, wouldn't happen because there was no "security."

Noted Middle East peace and security expert Jimmy Carter told NBC's "Today" show in September 2004 that he was confident the elections would not take place. "I personally do not believe they're going to be ready for the election in January ... because there's no security there," he said.

At the first presidential debate in September 2004, Sen. John Kerry used his closing statement to criticize the scheduled Iraqi elections saying: "They can't have an election right now. The president's not getting the job done."

About the same time, U.N. Secretary General Kofi Annan said he doubted there would be elections in January, saying, "You cannot have credible elections if the security conditions continue as they are now" -- although he may have been referring here to a possible vote of the U.N. Security Council.

In October 2004, Nicholas Lemann wrote in The New Yorker that "it may not be safe enough there for the scheduled elections to be held in January."

Days before the first election in Iraq in January 2005, The New York Times began an article on the election this way:

"Hejaz Hazim, a computer engineer who could not find a job in computers and now cleans clothes, slammed his iron into a dress shirt the other day and let off a burst of steam about the coming election.
"'This election is bogus,' Mr. Hazim said. 'There is no drinking water in this city. There is no security. Why should I vote?'"

If there's a more artful articulation of the time-honored linkage between drinking water and voting, I have yet to hear it.

And then, as scheduled, in January 2005, millions of citizens in a country that has never had a free election risked their lives to cast ballots in a free democratic election. They've voted twice more since then.

Now our forces are killing lots of al-Qaida jihadists, preventing another terrorist attack on U.S. soil, and giving democracy in Iraq a chance -- and Democrats say we are "losing" this war. I think that's a direct quote from their leader in the Senate, Harry Reid, but it may have been the Osama bin Laden tape released this week. I always get those two confused.

OK, they knew what Petraeus was going to say. But we knew what the Democrats were going to say. If liberals are not traitors, their only fallback argument at this point is that they're really stupid.
http://www.anncoulter.com/thumbs/coulter124.jpg

OK, all the following: A, Traitors, B, Really stupid and C, Demented loons.


IP: Logged

jwhop
Knowflake

Posts: 2787
From: Madeira Beach, FL USA
Registered: Apr 2009

posted September 20, 2007 02:17 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for jwhop     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Yes, I know who Alex Jones is.

But predicting something which later comes true does not make one a seer...especially since the al-Qaeda attacks on 9/11 were planned in 1998 and not by George W Bush but rather by al-Qaeda.

Of course Johnny, terrorists had already attacked the WTC in February 1993 and failed to bring it down. al-Qaeda had also attacked US embassies, the Kobar Towers and the USS Cole...all when Commander Corruption was playing with Cuban cigars in the Oval Office.

It doesn't take a crystal ball to predict another attack against the US...and especially against a symbol of the economic power of the United States...the WTC...a symbol attacked before which failed to accomplish the terrorist mission.

You're evading my question Johnny.

IP: Logged

All times are Eastern Standard Time

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | Linda-Goodman.com

Copyright © 2011

Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.46a