Lindaland
  Global Unity
  Dick Cheney says "So"... (Page 1)

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone!
This topic is 2 pages long:   1  2 
next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Dick Cheney says "So"...
ghanima81
Moderator

Posts: 518
From: Maine
Registered: Apr 2009

posted March 20, 2008 09:13 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for ghanima81     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

I love that our figureheads really stand by their people. I'm sure there was a much better way for him to say this...
http://thinkprogress.org/2008/03/19/cheney-poll-iraq/

IP: Logged

pidaua
Knowflake

Posts: 67
From: Back in AZ with Bear the Leo
Registered: Apr 2009

posted March 20, 2008 09:46 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for pidaua     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
double post sorry....

IP: Logged

pidaua
Knowflake

Posts: 67
From: Back in AZ with Bear the Leo
Registered: Apr 2009

posted March 20, 2008 09:53 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for pidaua     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Do I really think that 2/3 of the population knows or even understands what we are doing in Iraq? No, I don't. In fact only 300,000 people are in the Army (out of 200 Million people that live in the US- well.. those that are legally counted) most people here don't even have a close one IN the Military (which still equals to less than 500,000 out of 200 Million).

I understand what Cheney is saying. Most of what we get is force fed from the media. Maybe people don't give a crap about what I have to say... Maybe I don't matter in the long run..

But.. I am married to a Soldier that has already been downrange (what we call either being in Iraq or Afghanistan) and he will be leaving again at the end of the year. I live in Schweinfurt, Germany- WE have lost more Soldier's than any post in Europe and most in America.


I have attended the funerals, I have Bear's Will and know what to do when he leaves. I also have to take care of the families of Soldiers while my DH is downrange because (due to his promotion) I am now the head of the Family Readiness Group.

Do I understand what Cheney is saying? HELL YES...Do I think our Soldier's lives are worth 1 million terrorist lives? NO..

I am tired of this.. BUT I live this. I am the one (and I am one of many) that have the heartache of watching our husbands and friends train for combat.

Sooo.. My thought is this.. THANK YOU for those that support the Military.. and for those that think demonstrating, calling our Soldier's baby killers or being dumba$$ protesters that just need some cause to protest about.. YOU aren't needed, YOU do not save our loved ones lives, YOU are selfish and only care about YOUR cause... THEREFORE.. you really don't matter in our hearts because you really don't care.

SOOOOO.. keep protesting for your own gratification and OUR husbands / wives will keep dying so that you have that right.

Walk in our shoes.... notify OUR families of the spouse that just died in combat because a terrorist convinced a child to carry a bomb on their back.. and then ... then.. get back to me about how much you care about US.

IP: Logged

ghanima81
Moderator

Posts: 518
From: Maine
Registered: Apr 2009

posted March 20, 2008 09:59 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for ghanima81     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Um... thanks for the sad story. I think we all know it by now, and are still entitled to our opinions. Please don't make the assumption that because I posted this, I do not support the people that are involved in this war. They are humans, and therefore, have value to me.

I don't support the response Cheney had for the interviewer. I don't support Cheney, nor should any soldier. 5 deferments in Vietnam, and now he's a warmonger? He is an arrogant a$$ and it just makes me sick to see him say things like this.

I realize that because of the efforts of our military throughout history I am afforded the luxury of freedom, but honestly, it's just luck I was born here.

I would not support killing people no matter where I was from. That's just me.

IP: Logged

jwhop
Knowflake

Posts: 2787
From: Madeira Beach, FL USA
Registered: Apr 2009

posted March 20, 2008 10:27 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for jwhop     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
As usual with the brain dead morons of the press, the lie was in the question.

2/3 of Americans do not oppose the war in Iraq.

Time has brought change...as Cheney says. What's true is that real leaders don't wet their fingers and hold them in the air to see which way the wind is blowing in the moment.

The Congress of the United States passed a joint resolution of Congress to use military force to remove Saddam Hussein.

The men and women in uniform are not toys to be used in a political football game or for political advantage.

God, how I despise those who voted for removing Saddam and have since used every device to undermine the men and women of the US military. The one best word to describe them is "contemptible".

Now, the truth about support for the war...and it's a very real problem for democrats. Especially those who have been waving the white flag attempting to surrender to the terrorists and singing along with the terrorists from their hymn book. The war, as they insisted is not and was not lost.

Pid Hang in there****edited***.

Support for war effort highest since 2006
By DAVID PAUL KUHN | 3/12/08 7:43 PM EST


As the war nears its fifth year, the steady upturn in the public mood stands to alter the dynamics of races up and down the ballot.

American public support for the military effort in Iraq has reached a high point unseen since the summer of 2006, a development that promises to reshape the political landscape.

According to late February polling conducted by the Pew Research Center for the People and the Press, 53 percent of Americans — a slim majority — now believe “the U.S. will ultimately succeed in achieving its goals” in Iraq. That figure is up from 42 percent in September 2007.

The percentage of those who believe the war in Iraq is going “very well” or “fairly well” is also up, from 30 percent in February 2007 to 48 percent today.
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0308/9016.html


IP: Logged

Heart--Shaped Cross
Newflake

Posts: 0
From:
Registered: Nov 2010

posted March 20, 2008 10:33 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Heart--Shaped Cross     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
American soldiers against the Iraq War

Fortunately there are still decent, courageous soldiers in the US army, such as those recently interviewed about their objections to the Iraq war on CBS's 60 mins:

"Naval Petty Officer Jonathan Hutto, who serves on the USS Theodore Roosevelt, which was deployed in the Gulf during Operation Iraqi Freedom.

"I'm not anti-war. I'm not a pacifist. I'm not opposed to protecting our country and defending our principles. But at the same time, as citizens it's our obligation to have a questioning attitude, you know, about policy," Hutto says,

"Just because we volunteered for the military, doesn't mean we volunteered to put our lives in unnecessary harm, and to carry out missions that are illogical and immoral," Madden adds."
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/02/22/60minutes/main2505412_page2.shtml

Yes, it was established at Nuremburg after WWII that "I was just obeying orders" is no excuse.

More recently Hersh broke the Abu Ghraib story - which again was very powerful due to the evidence of the photos, foolishly taken by those involved.

Currently he has been writing about the US plans to attack Iran ! It's bad enough Vietnam didn't teach the Bush gang anything, but after the disaster of Iraq - to even contemplate attacking Iran ... !
http://www.france24.com/france24Public/en/archives/talk/2007/March/20070302-in terview-hersh.html

IP: Logged

Heart--Shaped Cross
Newflake

Posts: 0
From:
Registered: Nov 2010

posted March 20, 2008 10:36 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Heart--Shaped Cross     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
GIs Petition Congress To End Iraq War


(CBS) Americans in the military have been asked to make extraordinary sacrifices in recent years, particularly in Iraq, where the casualties are mounting, the tours are being extended, and some of them have had enough.

Correspondent Lara Logan heard dissension in the ranks from a large group of service members who are fed up and have decided to go public. They’re not going AWOL, they're not disobeying orders or even refusing to fight in Iraq. But they are doing something unthinkable to many in uniform: bypassing the chain of command to denounce a war they’re in the middle of fighting.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"As a patriotic citizen who served two combat tours in Iraq, I just feel like this war, it's simply just not working out anymore, and soldiers are dying there everyday," says Specialist Kevin Torres.

Torres didn’t always feel that way—he enlisted in the Army right out of high school, after 9/11. He has twice served in Iraq, patrolling the mainly Kurdish north of the country, and carrying out combat patrols and goodwill missions.

"I joined because I just wanted to make a difference. I wanted to be a part of our generation's war," Torres says.

"You've been on two deployments and you didn't always feel this way. Was there a point at which, you know, something you experienced that made you think," Logan asks.

"Yeah. In January, we were doing routine presence patrol through the city of Hawija, and one of our trucks was hit by a roadside bomb, an IED, and it killed four of the soldiers out of the five that were in the truck. And during the recovery of the fallen soldiers all the debris outside of the truck. And we just had the truck was loaded with school supplies and soccer balls and crayons and notebooks and coloring books. We just wanna help. And it was just a really eye-opening and frustrating experience. Because we're still getting killed out there," he says.

It’s a sentiment echoed by all of the service members who are part of this protest.

60 Minutes gathered some of them in Washington, but they had to be off base, out of uniform and off duty to speak to Logan on camera.

They’ve all sent a petition, called “Appeal For Redress,” to their individual members of Congress, letting them know that “Staying in Iraq will not work” and it’s “time for U.S. troops to come home.”

"It's not about speaking out against the military or speaking out against the war. It's just, we're here four years down the line and there's not an end to it," Sgt. Evans, one of the dissenters, tells Logan.

"What are we trying to accomplish over there? I mean, what is what are we trying to do in Iraq?" another soldier, Sgt. Ronn Cantu asks.

What does he think?

"I don't even know anymore," he tells Logan.

"Well, what would you say to the people that say, 'Alright, it's clear that the war in Iraq is incredibly difficult and life is really tough both for Americans and for Iraqis, but pulling out's not the answer. It's only gonna get worse. There's gonna be all-out civil war,'" Logan asks.

"How does that become the default? Either someday, we have to leave. We can't stay in Iraq for the next thousand years," one soldier remarks.

Asked if there's a possibility that Iraq might be better off if American troops stay and finish the job, Cantu says, "But then our lives are hanging in the balance of a flip of a coin."

"That doesn't seem worth it to you? Those are not good odds?" Logan asks.

"Yes. I mean, we volunteered to make a difference, not just be part of an experiment," he replies.

(CBS) The idea for this protest by active duty and reserve service members came from two enlisted men who served in the war: Marine Sgt. Liam Madden, who got to Iraq during the battle of Falluja, and his military commitment is up this winter, and Naval Petty Officer Jonathan Hutto, who serves on the USS Theodore Roosevelt, which was deployed in the Gulf during Operation Iraqi Freedom.

"I'm not anti-war. I'm not a pacifist. I'm not opposed to protecting our country and defending our principles. But at the same time, as citizens it's our obligation to have a questioning attitude, you know, about policy," Hutto says,

"Just because we volunteered for the military, doesn't mean we volunteered to put our lives in unnecessary harm, and to carry out missions that are illogical and immoral," Madden adds.

They say they’re permitted to express their opinions under a number of military rules, which the group lists. Among them is the 1995 Military Whistleblower Act. Although it prohibits them from speaking against the Commander in Chief or any of their superior officers, it does allow “Members of the Armed Forces…” to speak on their own behalf and “to make a protected communication to… Congress.”

"A senior officer in the Marine Corps said to me when I asked him about the Appeal, what was his opinion – and he served in both Iraq wars – he said, 'I have a hard enough time getting young men to put themselves in harm’s way, without having to have men in uniform tell them it’s not worth it,'" Logan remarks.

"We’re not telling young men and women that it’s not worth it, to serve their country. We’ve served our country. The men and women who have signed the appeal have served their country. So those, we’re not saying it’s not worth it. We’re saying that, if you have reservations about it to communicate it. That’s simply what it is," Hutto says.

"There are gonna be a lot of people who don't like what you’re doing," Logan says.

"By volunteering we've done more than about 99 percent of the population. And anybody who joined after 9/11 when the country was at a state of war, it's my opinion that nobody has the right to question that soldier's patriotism, nobody," Cantu replies.

"There are going to be a lot of people listening to this who say that, 'You're a traitor. You're betraying your uniform. You don't deserve to wear it,'" says Logan.

"I hope there aren't people that think that," says Lt. Commander Mark Dearden.

For him, going public has been one of the hardest decisions of his life. He’s a combat surgeon who served during Operation Iraqi Freedom, returned for a second tour and now treats soldiers at a Naval hospital in California.

"The decision to come here for me personally was not an easy one. And I don't expect it was for anyone. Last night I was with my family in the park in our town and it hit me that 'At this very moment, while I'm standing here, people are fighting and people are dying.' I've seen it with my own eyes. And I can feel it in my chest," Dearden says.

Dearden acknowledges this is very hard for him and he also admits that it isn't so much a protest as a plea.

According to a recent Military Times survey, many in uniform feel the same way. The poll found that for the first time ever more US soldiers oppose the president’s handling of the war in Iraq than support it.

Still, critics claim the group is partisan, just out to boost Democrats who oppose the war.

"I'm certainly not liberal, and I doubt many of the members on this panel are liberal. It's not funded by any partisan organization. It's soldiers. It's service members. It's grass roots. It's us," says Lt. Kent Gneiting.

White House spokesman Tony Snow has dismissed the protesters as an insignificant minority. "It’s not unusual for soldiers in a time of war to have some misgivings. You have several hundred thousand who served in Iraq. You have reenlistment rates that have exceeded goals in all the military," he said.

Logan read to the group: "And then he goes on to say that it's unfortunate that people like you – and the quote is – are 'going to be able to get more press than the hundreds of thousands who have come back and said they are proud of their service.'"

Sgt. Cantu responds, "You got two right here who are gonna do multiple tours in Iraq and, you know, I'm reenlisting. I never said I wasn't proud of my service. I fit some of those statistics right there myself."

(CBS) For many in uniform, there’s an unwritten code of honor that says no matter how tough your situation is or whatever your private doubts about the mission may be, you just never speak out publicly against it, and so for them what the service members of this campaign are doing is nothing short of a betrayal.

"That’s not something I would do personally," a specialist remarks.

Logan spoke with soldiers from the 1st Cavalry who are currently serving in Baghdad. They acknowledged that the servicemen and women who signed the petition have the right to do so – but that doesn’t mean they should.

"I think every American soldier throughout history has wanted combat to stop," a major remarked.

"As an American soldier I feel like we took an oath to obey the orders of our Commander in Chief and officers appointed over us," Army Spec. James Smauldon adds.

"The war has been very difficult, the violence has not decreased at all, if anything it has gotten worse. Is there a part of you that sort of says, 'Yeah I understand why someone feels like this?'" Logan asks.

"I know what I’m here fighting for, to give the Iraqi people some democracy and hope so I am 100 percent behind this mission. You don’t sign up to pick which war you go to," Army Capt. Lawrence Nunn replies.

What would Ronn Cantu say to that?

"We haven't said that we're not going to war. But the time this airs I'll be back in Iraq," he replies.

"We don't get to choose the mission. Our leadership gets to choose the mission. Congress gets to choose the mission. My Congressman is Lacy Clay. I would like to tell him as a constituent of his, "Is this really – is this it?" Staff Sgt. Matt Nuckolls says.

"What do you mean, is this it?" Logan asks.

Says Nuckolls, "Is the mission in Iraq really what you want us to be doing? And then he responds, yes. Okay, well we go back to Iraq and keep doing what we're doing."

"We volunteer to make a difference, not just throw our lives away," Cantu adds.

Sgt. Ronn Cantu served in the army before 9/11 and re-enlisted after the terrorist attacks. He was in Iraq in 2004 and was headed back when 60 Minutes interviewed him. Although he says he will follow whatever orders he’s given, he personally feels this war is no longer worth fighting.

He is a third generation military man in his family. "The third generation to have served, the first who made the decision to make the military a career," he explains.

Asked if he thinks the petition could be career suicide, Cantu says, "Only time will tell."

"You're going back. Are you worried about what the consequences are going to be for you back there, when people know how you feel?" Logan asks.

"All I can do is just convey to those soldiers that I do not want them to die in Iraq and that I will do everything I can do bring them home safe," Cantu says.

"Once you're in that combat zone and once those bullets start flying it's, all those politics are out the window. It's not about foreign policy or what anybody says. It's about the man to your left and to your right. And now you're just out there defending each other," Kevin Torres says. "Nothing will ever change that."

Despite the fact that polls show the majority of the American public has turned against the war in Iraq, support for the troops remains high, even for soldiers like Specialist Torres, whose 101st Airborne was recently welcomed home with a parade near their home base at Ft. Campbell.

What did that mean to him when he returned home and saw the warm welcome?

"When you're in Iraq you're worried that you're sort of forgotten. The only people that are really concerned with the war in Iraq are people who have family members or loved ones in Iraq. And when you come home and you see a town welcome you and, you know, set up a parade it's comforting," he says.

"What would you say to your children 30 years from now about the war you fought?" Logan asks.

"That I was just doing what my country asked me to do and I did it well," Torres replies.

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/02/22/60minutes/main2505412.shtml

IP: Logged

Heart--Shaped Cross
Newflake

Posts: 0
From:
Registered: Nov 2010

posted March 20, 2008 10:45 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Heart--Shaped Cross     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
MISSION ACCOMPLISHED!!!

Who's really paying for this war?


IP: Logged

pidaua
Knowflake

Posts: 67
From: Back in AZ with Bear the Leo
Registered: Apr 2009

posted March 20, 2008 11:11 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for pidaua     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
HSC.. are you kidding me? You are bringing up OLD pics to prove a dead point (pun not intended). Do you really care about the Soldiers dying? How many are actually protesting for those that gave their lives instead of just protesting for the sake of protesting?

I can post the numbers of those "protesting" VETERANS that actually served in the war over the last 5 years and they are insignificant compared to those that opt to go back to finish what was started. For every pic you post of a child that died, we can post 500 of those that are ALIVE and free from torture.

BUT.. does it matter? No.. for morons like you, all you care about it being able to stand on yet another soap box so that YOU can have some kind of attention.

If you really cared, maybe you would DO something other than protest..

But.. I don't expect much from you or those like you (remember, you have posted fake and inflammatory pics before). You are better off just spouting off your venom so that you get the attention you crave.

G-

Good to see you again, but I have to disagree with what you have posted and I have said why. Live my life. Kiss your husband goodbye, watch him train to go to war and then tell me how much you are trying to save MY heart from breaking. Then again, I KNOW why we are there, I know that women are now allowed to vote, children are not tortured in front of their parents and my husband (in his last deployment) worked with SF to bring down one of the biggest terrorists we know..

But hey, what the hell do I know? I just live the life and send him off to war, you all know better because you are "saving the innocents from going to war"

IP: Logged

jwhop
Knowflake

Posts: 2787
From: Madeira Beach, FL USA
Registered: Apr 2009

posted March 20, 2008 11:16 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for jwhop     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Do you intend to spam every thread with your same antiwar BS HSC?

I think we all get it...where you're coming from. I just wonder how truthful your sources are or if you even know, or care.

Why don't you tell us HSC. Do you give a rat's ass about whether your sources are telling the truth...or not. Do you give a rat's ass whether the pictures you posted depict people injured or killed by US military forces.

Do you give a rat's ass when terrorists deliberately target and kill Iraqi civilians HSC? I've never seen you comment on those injuries and deaths...and they are far and away the majority of injuries and deaths of Iraqi civilians.

You could clear this up HSC and quickly by explaining what injuries and deaths pluck at your heartstrings.

IP: Logged

pidaua
Knowflake

Posts: 67
From: Back in AZ with Bear the Leo
Registered: Apr 2009

posted March 20, 2008 11:23 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for pidaua     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Of course he does jhwop.. and when that doesn't work and people turn against him.. well then he will threaten suicide, like he has done so many times before, to gain sympathy, and then continue with his incoherent diatribes..


It is typical HSC.. he hasn't had a forum for a good while so now he is using the 5th anniversary of the war to put the spotlight on him again.. So TYPICAL of him LOL...

Hey... are you ready for more popcorn jwhop? Hee hee

IP: Logged

Heart--Shaped Cross
Newflake

Posts: 0
From:
Registered: Nov 2010

posted March 20, 2008 11:24 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Heart--Shaped Cross     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

I love you guys!

IP: Logged

jwhop
Knowflake

Posts: 2787
From: Madeira Beach, FL USA
Registered: Apr 2009

posted March 20, 2008 11:38 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for jwhop     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
You may "love us guys" HSC...though I would have to question your eyesight since Pid is most definitely not a guy.

However, I notice you didn't answer any of the questions....and they were very reasonable questions to ask given the history of lying by most of the antiwar groups....not to mention lying by a host of people who say they witnessed various acts of outrage by US military forces. When it's discovered these phony soldiers never served in the military, it suddenly goes quiet, very quiet.

But hey, lying in a good cause is acceptable isn't it. Hell, it's even worthy of praise.

Hey Pid, things are heating up on the demoscat front and the main event is still months away. Definitely going to be a double butter popcorn event.

IP: Logged

venusdeindia
unregistered
posted March 21, 2008 02:23 AM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
and in keeping with traditions here goes the Discussion Derailing Disinformation Drill


Eight Traits of the Disinformationalist

by H. Michael Sweeney <

posted by Mirandee

..........
.........
2) Selectivity. They tend to pick and choose opponents carefully, either applying the hit-and-run approach against mere commentators supportive of opponents, or focusing heavier attacks on key opponents who are known to directly address issues. Should a commentatorbecome argumentative with any success, the focus will shift to include the commentator as well.

3) Coincidental. They tend to surface suddenly and somewhat coincidentally with a new controversial topic with no clear prior record of participation in general discussions in the particular public arena involved. They likewise tend to vanish once the topic is no longer of general concern. They were likely directed or elected to be there for a reason, and vanish with the reason.

4) Teamwork. They tend to operate in self-congratulatory and complementary packs or teams. Of course, this can happen naturally in any public forum, but there will likely be an ongoing pattern of frequent exchanges of this sort where professionals are involved. Sometimes one of the players will infiltrate the opponent camp to become a source for straw man or other tactics designed to dilute opponent presentation strength.

................


my, oh my the accurate almost textbook procedure, thread after thread.... LMAO

keep it up Ghanima and HSC.
the fact that one child has his life ruined and 500 others didnt, is NOT of any significance ....to a Disinformationalist. they owe their allegiance to one thing and one thing alone, the EGO gratification that comes with convincing themselves they are right. do yourselves a favor by not letting urselves get sucked into any discussion they feed off, its a waste of ur time and energy.they are not intellectually or emotionally capable of Discussions, take a look at any old thread... .Try making more threads, that actually serve the purpose of this forum. THAT should really get the Drill Sergents.... LMAO

IP: Logged

AcousticGod
Knowflake

Posts: 4415
From: Pleasanton, CA
Registered: Apr 2009

posted March 21, 2008 02:26 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for AcousticGod     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
updated 12:43 p.m. EDT, Wed March 19, 2008

Fewer than one in three respondents -- 32 percent -- said they support the war, while 66 percent said they oppose it.

Only 36 percent of those polled said the situation in Iraq was worth going to war over -- down from 68 percent in March 2003, when the war began.

The poll surveyed 1,019 adult Americans from March 14 to 16. http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/03/18/poll.iraq.economy/index.html

IP: Logged

venusdeindia
unregistered
posted March 21, 2008 02:31 AM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
....rushes to get popcorn..... now that AG has come up with facts... the drill is about to get more intense....

IP: Logged

TINK
unregistered
posted March 21, 2008 08:44 AM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Sad thread no matter how you look at it

It's sometimes difficult for those who question the validity of the Iraqi invasion to maintain an honest compassion for the soldiers involved. And for those protestors who are able to seperate their frustration with government policies from those obliged to carry out those policies, it's nearly impossible to convince the understandably wary soldiers. Not to mention the difficulty for the soldiers, and maybe even more so those that love them, to not see war protesting as a personal attack.

IP: Logged

jwhop
Knowflake

Posts: 2787
From: Madeira Beach, FL USA
Registered: Apr 2009

posted March 21, 2008 10:29 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for jwhop     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
The poll results I posted were from the Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. I know you have trouble understanding what they say over at Pew.

Truth is that you can get any result you want by sampling the right group or the right geographical area. You can also get the result you want by asking loaded questions...or failing to give respondents the choice which corresponds with what they actually think about a subject.

Nothing coming out of CNN or CBS can be believed and very little coming out of the MSM can be believed either. We've already gone down the road titled "Who do you trust in the Main Stream Media" and found Americans don't trust any of them as far as they could throw them.

You might be interested to know McCain has opened a 10 point lead over Hillary and a 7 point lead over O'Bomber. So says the Rasmussen Daily Tracking Poll.
http://rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_20082/2008_presidential_election/general_election_match_up_history

"Daily tracking results are collected via nightly telephone surveys and reported on a four-day rolling average basis. The general election sample is currently based upon interviews with 1,600 Likely Voters. The margin of sampling error is +/- 3 percentage points with a 95% level of confidence."

**Notice, this is a poll of likely voters....those who vote and elect candidates.

This throws the CNN poll and others into the trash. McCain IS the candidate who vows to keep US forces in Iraq until the war is won and the government is able to defend Iraq from enemies within and without.

So, if there's all this "bring the troops home today" sentiment among Americans...as leftists and their butt boys and girls in the press constantly shriek...then why the hell is McCain, the so called war candidate pulling away from both the antiwar demoscat candidates...Hillary and O'Bomber?

I don't expect very much actual thinking on this subject or any other from those who substitute hot button "feeling" for rational thought.

IP: Logged

AcousticGod
Knowflake

Posts: 4415
From: Pleasanton, CA
Registered: Apr 2009

posted March 21, 2008 11:17 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for AcousticGod     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
If there were some actual thinking about it, you might notice that you said:

quote:
2/3 of Americans do not oppose the war in Iraq.

But you posted:

quote:
53 percent of Americans — a slim majority — now believe “the U.S. will ultimately succeed in achieving its goals” in Iraq. That figure is up from 42 percent in September 2007.

The percentage of those who believe the war in Iraq is going “very well” or “fairly well” is also up, from 30 percent in February 2007 to 48 percent today.


Neither of which speaks to whether people support or oppose the war. The opinions you posted speak to whether the public believes our nation's objectives in the war are being met.

I can think the war was moronic, but if I was asked about how it's going I'd have to be positive about it, too. If I was asked whether I think a troop pullout should happen quickly, I would have to say no (even while that would be nice).

quote:
Five years after the start of the conflict in Iraq, many public evaluations of the situation in Iraq have turned more positive. But there has been no turnaround in the public's opinion about the original decision to take military action in Iraq. While ratings of how things are going in Iraq have improved over the past year and more Americans now say the United States should keep troops there, the proportion saying the initial decision to go to war was wrong has increased since the spring of 2007.

In Pew's latest national survey, conducted Feb. 20-24 among 1,508 adults, a 54% majority said the U.S. made the wrong decision in using military force in Iraq, while 38% said it was the right decision. Last March, 49% said the decision to got to war was wrong, while 43% said it was right. During the third and fourth years of the conflict public opinion on this question was divided, while in the war's first two years clear majorities backed the decision to use force in Iraq.
http://pewresearch.org/pubs/770/iraq-war-five-year-anniversary


IP: Logged

ghanima81
Moderator

Posts: 518
From: Maine
Registered: Apr 2009

posted March 21, 2008 12:35 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for ghanima81     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Pid,

BTW, I was being ironic in my first response sentence, following in Cheney's footsteps to make a point. I have nothing but respect for what you do to support your husband and all Americans that are involved in this conflict. I do not like this conflict, but, it is what it is...

One of my best friends is on his 4th tour in Iraq as a Staff Seargent Marine. I write to him every day, and in case anyone cares, he completely supports Bush, and what this war is about. That does not mean we cannot be on the same page about humanity, however, and he respects my opinions although they differ from his.

HSC,

TINK,

You are completely right. It's a very tender subject, and one that will never really compromise on either side. It's evidenced in the way Vietnam vets are still treated by those who opposed that war; the people who dodged the draft are treated by the vets; etc.the anger and resentment that stems from these conflicts is almost worse, as it tears countries apart.

IP: Logged

jwhop
Knowflake

Posts: 2787
From: Madeira Beach, FL USA
Registered: Apr 2009

posted March 21, 2008 12:38 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for jwhop     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Oh dear acoustic, did you miss this in the very same report..Pew...from which you just posted bits. I'm going to be charitable acoustic and give you the benefit of the doubt.

"While Democrats increasingly constitute the bulk of voters who support the withdrawal of troops, the public shift of opinion overall has been dramatic. As many voters now believe that the war is going “well” as “not well” — 48 percent each, according to Pew.

Pew also found that 49 percent favor bringing the troops home as soon as possible, while 47 percent say the troops should stay in until the situation stabilizes — statistical parity between the two positions."

Now acoustic, as to how many believe the war was a mistake NOW. Now doesn't matter a diddly squat.

It's what they believed when the Joint Resolution of Congress to remove Saddan was passed. Passed I might add with wide and deep support of democrats in the Congress of the United States.

This is what Americans thought then.

Pew Research Center 1/8-12/03
Would you favor or oppose taking military action in Iraq to end Saddam Hussein's rule? 68% Favor 25% Oppose 7% Don't know.
http://people-press.org/commentary/display.php3?AnalysisID=60

Public opinion is fickle and changable acoustic but we cannot commit US military forces to war and then say whoops let's end it because the public is NOW against it.

You also missed this in the Pew report...being charitable again acoustic.

"Half of self-identified independents polled now believe the United States should “keep troops in Iraq until the situation has stabilized,” according to polling data assembled by Pew at Politico’s request.

Senior foreign policy aides to Clinton and Obama said in interviews that their candidates have no intention of reconsidering their pledges to withdraw troops from Iraq, despite the waning of public opposition."

So there you have it acoustic. You and other leftists have whined and shrieked that Bush and others are out of step with America on the subject of the war in Iraq.

Now, we have the Hillary and O'Bomber campaigns saying that essentially, they don't give a damn what the public thinks or comes to think...they're not going to "reconsider their pledges to withdraw troops from Iraq".

I see you weren't able to think...rationally...about what it means that the war candidate..John McCain is 10 points ahead of Hillary and 7 points ahead of O'Bomber...both antiwar candidates.

If you, demoscat butt boys and girls in the MSM, the shriekers and whiners in the demoscat surrender Congress were right about what America thinks about the Iraq war...then acoustic, both demoscats, Hillary and O'Bomber should be burying McCain and that's not happening.

IP: Logged

AcousticGod
Knowflake

Posts: 4415
From: Pleasanton, CA
Registered: Apr 2009

posted March 21, 2008 01:08 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for AcousticGod     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Now doesn't matter a diddly squat.

We are talking about NOW. Don't try to squirm, and change the subject. You posted a recent article to support your theory that "2/3 of Americans do not oppose the war in Iraq." Unfortunately, you didn't read your own article, which didn't say anything about supporting or opposing the war. If you stay on subject, it's quite clear that support for going to war is way down.

quote:
"Half of self-identified independents polled now believe the United States should “keep troops in Iraq until the situation has stabilized,” according to polling data assembled by Pew at Politico’s request.

I don't know why you bring this up. I've stated more than once on this forum that I too believe we should stay until Iraq is stable. But like the people Pew interviewed, it doesn't mean I endorsed the war. They are separate issues.

quote:
You and other leftists have whined and shrieked that Bush and others are out of step with America on the subject of the war in Iraq.

When I talk about people who have no idea what America thinks it's almost always (if not always) been in reference to you. Not Bush. I can make that argument, though, and it goes something like this:

"With few exceptions, his approval rating has been in the low 30s for the last year." http://blogs.usatoday.com/ondeadline/2008/03/new-poll-bush-a.html

quote:
Hillary and O'Bomber should be burying McCain and that's not happening.

McCain's not beating them either:

Fox News Today

IP: Logged

jwhop
Knowflake

Posts: 2787
From: Madeira Beach, FL USA
Registered: Apr 2009

posted March 21, 2008 01:45 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for jwhop     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
What is it acoustic you don't understand about the English language and of more import WHY do you not understand plain English?

"Pew also found that 49 percent favor bringing the troops home as soon as possible, while 47 percent say the troops should stay in until the situation stabilizes — statistical parity between the two positions."
http://pewresearch.org/pubs/770/iraq-war-five-year-anniversary

With few exceptions this bunch of leftist radicals in the demoscat Congress have the lowest job approval ratings ever recorded. On the other hand the Bush job approval rating is twice as high as that of this do nothing, know nothing demoscat Congress.

Now acoustic, exactly why would anyone believe YOU support the position of keeping US military forces in Iraq until the country is stable? I've seen no evidence of that...and, that puts you at odds with your surrender now demoscat Presidential candidates.

A 10 point lead over Hillary and a 7 point lead over O'Bomber MEANS McCain is beating both of them...at this point in time.

This is a daily tracking poll which tends to show the evolution of voters opinion.

Again, problems with English, problems with definitions.

I'm surprised you would stoop to quoting the Murdock owned..."fair and balanced" Fox News Network. Haven't you called Fox the Faux News Network?

IP: Logged

TINK
unregistered
posted March 21, 2008 01:59 PM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Why are we arguing percentages? If Dick doesn't care, why should we?

IP: Logged

jwhop
Knowflake

Posts: 2787
From: Madeira Beach, FL USA
Registered: Apr 2009

posted March 21, 2008 02:03 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for jwhop     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Dick Dolittle doesn't care?

***edit**

Oh yeah, the forgotten man Dick Cheney doesn't care about percentages.

IP: Logged


This topic is 2 pages long:   1  2 

All times are Eastern Standard Time

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | Linda-Goodman.com

Copyright © 2011

Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.46a