posted June 27, 2008 01:16 PM            

The negative GOP attacks crap won't work in this election!

Swiftboat him all you want....it will backfire

YES WE CAN!

Raymond

posted June 27, 2008 04:51 PM            

"Why anyone would consider voting for this psycho is beyond me."

posted June 27, 2008 05:19 PM            

Everything said in the video is true and beyond that there's much, much more the video didn't cover at all.

Little items like O'Bomber's lifelong ties to communist and socialist agitators...which is still the case...today.

Little items like O'Bomber's ties to Marxist domestic terrorist bombers.

And not to be forgotten is O'Bomber's ties to a now convicted felon who cut special deals for O'Bomber on real estate which O'Bomber then reciprocated by channeling business and money to his business organization(s).

Of course, the O'Bomber Kool-Aid drinkers don't want any part of the truth about O'Bomber to surface. Too bad because anyone in America who has brain wave activity is going to hear all about it before the election...including the fact there seems to be 2 different O'Bomber birth certificates floating around. One at the Raving House of Lunacy..daily kos and the other at an official O'Bomber site and neither look to be the real thing.

How big a nut does it take to believe Algore was elected President...and Bush stole the election from poor Al.

Some of these nuts don't know that getting "Swiftboated" is having the truth told about you...as John Traitor Kerry had the truth told about his military service in Vietnam...and told by the very group of military personnel who were with Kerry and had a ringside seat as he phonied up after action reports and put in for "Purple Hearts" he wasn't entitled to receive.

Oh, and Pid, you're right again that everyone surrounding Barack O'Bomber from his political gurus to his spiritual gurus to his wife despise the United States. I daresay most O'Bomber followers do too and it sticks out all over them.

It's definitely "Pop Corn" time in America.

posted June 27, 2008 06:37 PM            

quote:

---

How big a nut does it take to believe Algore was elected President...and Bush stole the election from poor Al.

---

posted June 27, 2008 11:28 PM            

Email rumors have charged that U.S. Presidential hopeful Barack Obama is a practing Muslim, a rumor that has since been proven false. However, Senator Obama does have an unusual name which reflects his African Muslim heritage.

Answer: Senator Obama was reportedly named after his father, Barack Hussein Obama, Sr.

The Senator's first name, Barack, is a Swahili name that has its origins in the Arabic language. The original Arabic root of the name (B-R-K) means "blessed." In Arabic, the root word is used in many other phrases to denote blessings and to describe people who are blessed:

* Mabruk! = "Congratulations!"
* Barakallah feek = "May God bless you"
* Barakah = blessings from God (feminine version of the name)

Senator Obama's middle name is Hussein, which was his grandfather's first name. The name, of Arabic origin, means "good" or "handsome one." It is common in Muslim cultures for children (both boys and girls) to have a middle name which directly connects them to their father or grandfather.

Senator Obama's surname is not uncommon among the Luo tribe, one of the three largest ethnic groups in Kenya. They speak the Dhoulou language.

http://islam.about.com/od/us2004election/f/obama.htm

Obama is not even a Muslim name

It's an African name

I hate when people are so ignorant about names and the heritages of people!

It's not like everybody in USA are supposed to have white sounding names. We are a melting pot of people. We always will be a meltingpot of people.

posted June 29, 2008 11:13 AM            

"Well, now you know how the majority felt when they elected Al Gore."

It follows naturally...as day follows night that if Algore was elected President and Bush IS President...then Bush must have stolen the election.

When are leftists going to get off this nonsense?

posted June 30, 2008 03:01 AM            

quote:

---

As usual acoustic, your reasoning and analysis is wrong. Algore wasn't elected. Bush was elected by the same electoral system in effect since the founding of the United States.
"Well, now you know how the majority felt when they elected Al Gore."

It follows naturally...as day follows night that if Algore was elected President and Bush IS President...then Bush must have stolen the election.

---

When you vote, you are voicing your [s]election of a candidate.

Elect:

1. to choose or select by vote, as for an office: to elect a mayor.

posted June 30, 2008 09:20 AM              

Black, yellow, red, white, purple or green.....the important point is that we are all One....time to stop the B/S, the negative perpetration of the quest for power/ control that the secret Power Elite so evidently wish to follow.

posted June 30, 2008 10:05 AM              

quote:

---

wuss like the ball less Barack O'Bomber decided to burnish a tough guy image and threaten to bomb our friend and ally Pakistan to score some cheap political points. God, what a moron he must be to think that after attempting to throw the war in Iraq since he's been in the Senate anyone would believe he's suddenly grown a pair and now wants to go after al-Qaeda.

---

corrction...he wanted to bomb terrorist hideouts...with no mention of friendly civilians getting involved...not unlike Iraq...which is actually ...not better at all

BUT...though i didnt see the video...however this is similar to the situation we faced a few years ago.an italian born catholic lady ending up the leader of the ruling party and in line for presidentship .she happened to be married into one of our own political dynasties on the lines of Kennedy..her husband and mother in law AND the MIL's father had been presidents...

but the opposing parties forced her to withdraw from the reckoning by raising a hue and cry over her nationality.
i and some other conservatives however suddenly faced an ideology-identity crisis

see...it what not about her religion or nationality, as much about her being unable to drive or even possibly KNOW what it is like to be an Indian ...without the lifestyle she was cushioned with.

posted June 30, 2008 10:37 AM            

No, "correction". O'Bomber said he would violate the sovereign borders of a sovereign nation which is both a friend and an ally of the United States and unleash a bombing campaign without Pakistan's permission.

posted June 30, 2008 10:46 AM            

Elected is the past tense of elect.

The word you were reaching for is voted (for) since "elected" is one of the "outcomes" of voting..."not elected" is the other outcome. Algore was "not elected".

posted June 30, 2008 11:27 AM              

quote:

---

Say, I seem to recall there are al-Qaeda members in India. How about we just bomb the hell out of them. No need to seek Indian permission to do so since it's clear they're within the borders of India and therefore India is harboring terrorists.

---

petition to Republicans and Democrats ...whoever has the balls...

BOMB at earliest

thats right, we are friends of the US too like our brother Pak, we deserve equal treatment.

go right ahead...the terrorists --
Al Qaeda and otherwise are found in the north west frontier....the borders high up in the Himalayas that we share with Pakistan and Afghanistan

NONE of them are of Indian nationality...which means we dont care a rats ass as to their exploding into mince.

80 % of thses terrorists comprise Pakistanis,
the rest ..everything from Arab to Bosnians..poor children smuggled to Paksitan to be trained in extremist religious schools.

of the 80 % paki...75 % are Pakistan army militants under the ISI chapter.some even cadets and army officers.

the number of Indian civilains who share the neighbourhood with these vermin is neglible. lesser than the number of indians who die in a single terrorist act..every month in India.

so go ahead...may the Lord guide ur missiles with precision.remember we indians believe in Karma.

imagine the afterlife u would be in for. having saved 5000 indians from dying in terrorist acts annually.

also dont see why it should be a big deal. u HAVE in the past bombed somalia without anyones permission

posted June 30, 2008 03:05 PM            

1. to choose or select by vote

It would pass any linguistic test any day of the week. They elected, i.e. they CHOSE or SELECTED by VOTE. There's no amount of saving face that could win you this one.

quote:

---

No, "correction". O'Bomber said he would violate the sovereign borders of a sovereign nation which is both a friend and an ally of the United States and unleash a bombing campaign without Pakistan's permission.

---

No, VDI was absolutely correct in putting you in your place. We've already been over this time and time again, though. It's just another argument you refuse to acknowledge that you've lost.

quote:

---

BOMB at earliest

thats right, we are friends of the US too like our brother Pak, we deserve equal treatment.

go right ahead...the terrorists --
Al Qaeda and otherwise are found in the north west frontier....the borders high up in the Himalayas that we share with Pakistan and Afghanistan

---

quote:

---

OK, I'll put your suggestion on the Bush...Things to do list.

---

Considering that Bush (I mean George W. Bomber) ALREADY has done what Obama suggested, I don't see why he wouldn't.

posted June 30, 2008 04:16 PM            

End of the story.

You wouldn't get that past the dumbest, most illiterate editor in America.

posted June 30, 2008 04:44 PM            

He was not President-elect as a result of our Electoral process, but that does not mean that the majority did not elect him.

posted July 01, 2008 10:27 AM            

This was NOT a racist video. It pointed out the facts concerning Obomber's real background, specifically HIS allies and their racism towards white people. Is it only racist when one hates minorities? As a minority I deplore racism from ANY race, although I understand it exists.

True- Obama didn't take part in over 100 votes in the senate and only voted "present". Why is that? It is because the man doesn't stand for anything and didn't want to make any "voting" statements that could be used against him in his presidential bid. By staying vague he can take a stand later depending on what he thinks the people "want" him to say. He'll do anything for a vote.

Fact- he would not put his hand over his heart for the National Anthem

Fact- he aligned himself with Reverand Wright for more than 20 years (until it blew up in his face). You saw what Mr. Wright stands for. Hell, just let someone insinuate a white person is in any way connected to "white pride" or the "KKK" and all hell breaks loose.

posted July 01, 2008 10:45 AM            

One may elect to get a haircut but that's an awkward way to express it. One may elect to do this or that...involving themselves but one does not elect a candidate for public office on the strength of whom they "elect" to vote for.

In America we have a well tested Presidential electoral process and when one receives 270 electoral votes, one is "elected" and not by any other method.

posted July 01, 2008 11:41 AM            

If you're having trouble thinking of times people use "elect" to mean "select," how about "elective surgury."

posted July 01, 2008 12:49 PM            

Electing a President is a group decision within the rules of the electoral process. One does not elect a President. A majority does not necessarily elect a President. A President is ELECTED when they receive 270 Electoral Votes and not in any other way.

Algore was not elected. Algore was selected by those who voted for him but couldn't and didn't elect him.

I can see...easily see...why you have such difficulty making rational arguments. You don't understand the English language. Your comment..Al Gore was elected, is not descriptive of the result of the 2000 election and conveys the wrong idea.

posted July 01, 2008 01:37 PM            

e·lect Audio Help /ɪˈlɛkt/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[i-lekt] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation
–verb (used with object)

1. to choose or select by vote, as for an office: to elect a mayor.

American Heritage Dictionary:
e·lect Audio Help (ĭ-lìkt') Pronunciation Key
v. e·lect·ed, e·lect·ing, e·lects

v. tr.

1. To select by vote for an office or for membership.

It's the first definition. When I say "elected" I'm obviously talking about the past tense of a verb.

Anyone literate in English wouldn't have been stupid enough to challenge me on this. And yes, my line accurately portrays the results of that election. The public majority elected Al Gore. Everyone affected by this election knows what happened, so it's a foregone conclusion that Al Gore didn't win the Presidency.