posted September 04, 2008 07:38 PM            

I though it particularly delicious to see O'Bomber speaking in Europe in front of 200,000 Germans and speaking in English.

posted September 04, 2008 11:42 PM            

He is an Idiot. Whats in a language?

All 3 (BO, Hillary, Biden) voted against english as official language because in the future there could be more immigrants from europe and other countries. Perhaps they are interested more in getting their votes.

posted September 05, 2008 10:25 AM            

Not one member of the press ever asked O'Bomber..."How many foreign languages do you speak Senator".

posted September 05, 2008 11:57 AM            

And I am so used to that free media pass given to BO. I don't even feel like talking about it.

People are ready to jeopardize their nation for this idiot.

Not even one law was passed by him.
And his Iraq war judgement must be that 131st vote where he finally made a decision and was designated a 'maverick' by his party

posted September 05, 2008 10:15 PM              

I like the offhand "oh they'll learn learn English" comment. Oh you think so? Immigrants aren't desperate to learn English for the same reason American tourists feel comfortable in Europe without the benefit of a second language - it's not necessary. We cater to Spanish speaking immigrants here in the US and while I certainly wouldn't say they do they same for us in Europe, most everyone in the main tourist destinations speak some English.

posted September 05, 2008 10:31 PM            

These stupid socialists are always 'out there' instead of the 'herenow'. That explains why they add more and more to the 'Total collective suffering' instead of removing them

posted September 05, 2008 10:40 PM            

Like the 7 year old girl who asked O'Bomber why he is running for President.
http://hotair.com/archives/2008/08/07/obama-america-is-no-longer-what-it-once-was/

Of course, Michelle Obama has done her share of heckling America and Americans too.

“Sometimes it’s easier to hold onto your own stereotypes and misconceptions. It makes you feel justified in your ignorance. That’s America.”

posted September 06, 2008 12:56 AM              

Of course, for you and I this disappointment is rooted in love.
But I think Obama, all the pretty "Hope" talk aside, has a nasty chip on his shoulder.

posted September 06, 2008 12:01 PM            

Was America better at it's founding?
But wait, there was institutional slavery. Couldn't have been then.

Was America better when native Indian populations were rounded up and forced onto wretched reservations. No, couldn't have been then.

Was America better when 800,000 Americans were killed in a civil war because of what was only partially the issue of slavery? No, it couldn't have been then.

Was America better in the early 20th Century era of Progressivism under Woodrow Wilson? Well, we fought a World War in Europe and left a lot of dead Americans on the battlefields there. Not to mention that Wilson had approximately 175,000 American citizens jailed for saying unkind things about him personally and against his administration. No, it couldn't have been then.

In fact, America couldn't have been better anytime before 1920 when an amendment to the US Constitution recognized women's right to vote.

So, what about periods after 1920?

Let's cut to the chase.

Was America better anytime before 1964 and 1965? These are the years the Civil Rights Act and the Voting Rights Act were enacted. So no, America couldn't have been better at any point prior to 1965.

Was America better in the Carter years...when an insane Islamic radical had the embassy in Tehran seized and more than 200 US citizens and diplomats were held hostage for 420 days...and Carter did nothing? No, it's not possible America was better in the Carter years with 21% interest rates and 10-12% inflation..hostages aside.

Surely, O'Bomber would not say America was better during the Reagan years. That would be heresy coming from a far left radical democrat.

So, was America better in the Clinton Administration? I recall those years of political, financial and moral corruption in the White House of the United States. I also recall the Clinton Administration standing aside while 1,000,000 Rwandan citizens were systematically slaughtered. I also remember the UN man in charge of UN Peace Keeping forces on the ground in Rwanda standing down and letting the slaughter take place. I also remember Clinton being at the forefront of those who promoted that man in charge of UN Peace Keeping Forces in Rwanda to Secretary General of the United Nations, Kofi Annan. There was much which happened in the Clinton administration which would totally disqualify that period from being a time when America was "better". 2 American embassies were bombed in Africa, the Marine barracks were bombed in Saudi Arabia, the WTC was bombed in NY City and the USS Cole was bombed in harbor in Yemen. Through it all, Clinton did nothing. So no, America was not better during the Clinton administration.

Since I know there's not a member of the far radical left...as O'Bomber is...who would say America was better in the first 4 years of the Bush Administration, I'm at a loss to calculate exactly when O'Bomber thinks America was better...than now.

What is true is that O'Bomber is and was a professional rabble rousing street protester against the United States. There is nothing whatsoever America could ever do to actually be better in the eyes of O'Bomber...short of electing him President. That's what all the hectoring, heckling and lecturing of America is all about. That's what drove O'Bomber to go to Europe and rip America in front of a foreign audience and that's why if in O'Bomber's first term as President, everyone in America owned a home free and clear, owned a brand new car of their choice, had universal health care, a full pension retirement fund, were employed at high paying jobs, had universal babysitting for working parents and every single thing O'Bomber has pushed....America still wouldn't measure up in O'Bomber's eyes and he would be campaigning for a second term on the theme.."Make America Better".

O'Bomber is a lying leftist socialist radical.

posted September 06, 2008 04:45 PM            

No Osama no 911.

posted September 07, 2008 02:52 PM              

I think maybe you're approaching the question from a political perspective. I'm considering a cultural angle.

posted September 08, 2008 02:04 PM            

It was also striking that O'Bomber said "I don't want that future for my children".

More hectoring, lecturing and heckling of America.

O'Bomber can solve the problem of the future of his children...as can all others.

posted September 08, 2008 03:08 PM            

I didn't think there were any leftists still attempting to promote this bullshiit.

The 9/11 attacks were planned in 1998...on Kommander Korruption's watch.

bin Laden himself told us why he felt safe in attacking the United States and that the United States was a paper tiger. He mentioned our fearless Kommander cutting and running out of Somalia among others.

Facts are facts. Kommander Korruption stood idly by and did nothing while the United States was repeatedly attacked in the 1990's. Now, what's a terrorist to think? Well, one thing bin Laden thought and those who were funding him, training his terrorist members and giving him shelter and training facilities is that there would be no price to pay for attacking the United States. Thanks Kommander Korruption.

When bin Laden fled Saudi Arabia..with his terrorist cadres and moved operations to Sudan, the US relationship with Sudan was in the toilet. In an attempt to make nice with the US, Sudan offered to hand over bin Laden to the United States....3 separate times...and the offer was made..as Sudan says to the highest levels of the US government. Kommander Korruption refused to take bin Laden. But, it wasn't only bin Laden who was offered on a silver platter, the offer included his top cadres of al-Qaeda commanders...and...all their lists, plans, financial connections, computers and everything bin Laden had in Sudan. Offer refused. bin Laden left for Afghanistan.

The CIA says Kommander Korruption was told on at least 10 separate occasions that they had located bin Laden in Afghanistan, had him targeted and wanted permission to take bin Laden out. Kommander Korruption refused or stalled until the information became useless with time and bin Laden moved.

One of Kommander Korruption's appointees, a woman named Jamie Goerlich wrote a policy whereby the CIA couldn't talk to the FBI and the FBI couldn't talk to the CIA about internal and external threats. They couldn't share information on suspects.
A US Attorney at the time wrote Goerlich's office and told her that decision would cost American lives. She was right.

In fact, one of the decisions coming out of the 9/11 Commission is that the wall of separation between the FBI and CIA, in fact, the wall between all US intelligence agencies and law enforcement agencies...is to be dissolved and it was dissolved.

The FBI had specific information that there were specific terrorists in the United States..before 9/11 and FBI Headquarters forbade the agent(s) from discussing it.

The DIA had identified 4 al-Qaeda terrorists in the United States before 9/11, wanted to contact the FBI and a Justice Department lawyer was dispatched to tell them no dice, no sharing of information. One of those terrorists was Atta and all four were on those planes which struck the WTC, the Pentagon or crashed in Pennsylvania.

So Blue Roamer, save your bullshiiit for the tourists. Kommander Korruption set in motion a train of events and inactions in the face of terrorist attacks which led directly to the attacks on the WTC and Pentagon and 3000 people died because of Kommander Korruption's dereliction of duty.

There's not a terrorist in the world, or a terrorist supporting nation who still believes there will be no price to pay if the US is attacked again.