Lindaland
  Global Unity
  Hillary: Human rights “can’t interfere with the global economic crisis.”

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Hillary: Human rights “can’t interfere with the global economic crisis.”
Mannu
Knowflake

Posts: 45
From: always here and no where
Registered: Apr 2009

posted March 10, 2009 10:15 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Mannu     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Well, the leftist spoke once again. It may be good for China to hear that but any rightist will have issues with it, don't you think? Socialism is indeed an attack on Human freedom as is proved once again by one of the Democrat dunces.

Source: TOI http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/msid-4175903,prtpage-1.cms


BEIJING: Hillary Clinton's trip to Beijing has come as a relief to China after the US secretary of state steered clear of human rights and other sensitive issues to focus on cooperation between the world powers.

The official English-language China Daily published an enthusiastic editorial, saying Clinton's visit to China -- part of her first overseas trip that also took in Japan, Indonesia and South Korea -- reassured Beijing.

"Many had waited anxiously for the new administration's China overtures, wondering if the precious signs of stabilization in bilateral ties at the end of the Bush years could survive the new White House resident's ambitions for change," it said.

"With Clinton in town highlighting common concerns, they finally received the much sought-after relief." China's communist leaders had initially given a nervous welcome to US President Barack Obama, fearing the Democrat leader would press them harder on human rights and trade issues than his predecessor, George W. Bush.

But Clinton, who wrapped up her trip on Sunday, sought repeatedly to reassure her hosts she wanted to spend her 40 hours in Beijing focusing on ways to work together, not debating their differences such as on human rights.

Clinton did meet with Chinese women's rights advocates at the US embassy and said she raised the issue in private with China's leaders.

But her comments that she would not let human rights stand in the way of co-operation on issues of major global importance, such as the economic crisis and climate change, drew criticism from activists in China and abroad.

Other points of dispute, such as US accusations of Chinese currency manipulation and Washington's arms sales to Taiwan, were also off the public agenda.

Xin Qiang, deputy director of the Centre for American Studies at Fudan University in Shanghai, said the Chinese government would have welcomed Clinton's conciliatory stance.

"Beijing doesn't want to hear any criticism on these issues, and now Beijing will be much relieved and happy that human rights and issues on Tibet and Taiwan have not been raised by Secretary Clinton," he said.

On the specific issue of Clinton not pressing hard on human rights, Xin said: "Beijing will take it as a good and friendly gesture extended by Washington."

The Global Times, another state-run newspaper, said Clinton's attitude towards China on human rights was "realistic."

"In the future, the United States will sooner or later raise the issue of human rights in China, but it might not be too extreme," it cited a professor at the China Foreign Affairs University, which operates under the guidance of the government, as saying.

"This type of realistic attitude could be followed by other Western leaders."

Other state media said Clinton's visit had revealed a distinct change in relations between the United States and China, with the power imbalance between them evening out.

"Whether it is in methods of contact or how issues are formulated, everything is very different from before," the Beijing News said in a comment piece.

"On a diplomatic level, China and the United States are becoming quite balanced."

Xin made similar remarks, pointing to Clinton apparently not mentioning the currency row between the two nations, after US Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner accused China in January of manipulating the yuan for a trade advantage.

"The United States have realized that you cannot criticize China unilaterally while you are also trying to get help from Beijing," he said.

IP: Logged

jwhop
Knowflake

Posts: 2787
From: Madeira Beach, FL USA
Registered: Apr 2009

posted March 10, 2009 10:58 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for jwhop     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
On the specific issue of Clinton not pressing hard on human rights, Xin said: "Beijing will take it as a good and friendly gesture extended by Washington."

Yes, a very "friendly" gesture indeed. So, how did China actually react to this "friendly" gesture on the part of the O'Bomber administration?

US protests 'harassment' by Chinese vessels
Mar 9, 8:31 PM (ET)
BY PAULINE JELINEK


WASHINGTON (AP) - Chinese ships surrounded and harassed a Navy mapping ship in international waters off China, at one point coming within 25 feet of the American boat and strewing debris in its path, the Defense Department said Monday. The Obama administration said it would continue naval operations in the South China Sea, most of which China considers its territory, and protested to China about what it called reckless behavior that endangered lives.

At one point during the incident Sunday the unarmed USNS Impeccable turned fire hoses on an approaching Chinese ship in self defense, the Pentagon said. At another point a Chinese ship played chicken with the Americans, stopping dead in front of the Impeccable as it tried to sail away, forcing the civilian mariners to slam on the brakes.

"We view these as unprofessional maneuvers" and a violation of international law, Pentagon spokesman Bryan Whitman said.....
http://apnews.myway.com/article/20090310/D96QR9H00.html

Words are cheap; especially when spoken by lying Socialists like the Chinese leadership..not to mention O'Bomber and Hillary. Liars lying to other liars and expecting belief on the part of those who hear or see them.

I'm a lot more interested in what people do. That's the measure of what's really going on and it's also the primary reason I don't believe a word coming out of the mouth of O'Bomber or any of his scurvy Socialist crew.

IP: Logged

All times are Eastern Standard Time

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | Linda-Goodman.com

Copyright © 2011

Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.46a