posted March 18, 2006 02:50 AM         

Conclusions

Here I explore the meanings of myths, legends, and lores as their authors and promoters related them to us.
The concepts behind these stories make up the basis for the following discussions and arguments.
Continue to remind yourself that myths and legends do not represent historical facts,
but they may refer to or implicate truths which are not self evident.
Who was controlling and stoking these myths?
I provide examples for the astute.

So, what do all these clues tell us?

There is an all-seeing, all-knowing intelligence that sends emissaries to Earth to carry out various assignments and missions. These emissaries incarnate as humans and follow instructions. And on rare occasion vital aspects of that all-seeing, all-knowing intelligence incarnate at critical nodes in our evolution or unfolding.

Whether this all-seeing, all-knowing intelligence is God depends on one's definitions of God and of Extraterrestrials (someone else's technology). See, Masquerade of Angels by Dr. Karla Turner (1994).

The letter S was one of the oldest symbols of Serpenthood, both in its shape and in its sibilant sound; and the Serpent was one of the oldest symbols of female power (see Serpent).

The Serpent impregnated Isis instead of her husband Osiris impregnating her (myth).

Horus is the Son of the Serpent (Set/Seth), and not the son of Osiris (i.e. M13).

The Serpent is the giver of Intelligence and the Guardian of the Tree of Knowledge (myth).

The Serpent has been upgraded by Christianity to the Prince of Darkness, the bitter enemy of God and man, and evil incarnate (myth).

This has me thinking

Light to All...

posted March 18, 2006 08:47 AM         

Other common restatments are:

Entities are not to be multiplied without necessity.
and

The simplest answer is usually the correct answer.
A re-statement of Occam's Razor, in more formal terms, is provided by information theory in the form of minimum message length.

"When deciding between two models which make equivalent predictions, choose the simpler one," makes the point that a simpler model that doesn't make equivalent predictions is not among the models that this criterion applies to in the first place. [1]

Leonardo da Vinci (1452–1519) lived after Occam's time and has a variant of Occam's razor. His variant short-circuits the need for sophistication by equating it to simplicity.

Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication.
Occam's Razor is now usually stated as follows:

Of two equivalent theories or explanations, all other things being equal, the simpler one is to be preferred.
As this is ambiguous, Isaac Newton's version may be better:

We are to admit no more causes of natural things than such as are both true and sufficient to explain their appearances.
In the spirit of Occam's Razor itself, the rule is sometimes stated as:

The simplest explanation is usually the best.
Another common statement of it is :

The simplest explanation that covers all the facts.
This is an over-simplification, or at least a little misleading. See above, "In science".

This rephrasing has several faults, the worst being that Occam's razor is only supposed to be used to choose between two scientific theories which are otherwise equally predictive. The second problem with the "simplest is best" equation is that Occam's razor never claims to choose the 'best' theory, but only proposes simplicity as the deciding factor in choosing between two otherwise equal theories. It's possible that, given more information, the more complex theory might turn out to be correct the majority of the time. Occam's razor makes no explicit claims as to whether or not this will happen, but prompts us to use the simpler theory until we have reason to do otherwise.

The earliest versions of the razor clearly imply that if a more complex theory is "necessary" then it need not be invalid. Perhaps a better way to state it is: "a correct theory of phenomena is only as complex as is necessary — and no more so — to explain said phenomena."
For More See:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam's_Razor

Even the ancients knew of the sperm being required for impregnation.
And a virgin can beome pregnant by using a device to introduce sperm..or even a finger to depost sperm near the cervix.
This lets her maintain "technical virginity" no matter how many children are born to her...as long as she never is penetrated by a penis. Of course during childbirth she will lose her hymen. That would be expected.
So..believe what you will...but remove for the moment the far fetched notions and take one(or more) man's ejaculate.....and insert very gently, without damaging the hymen, into the vagina of a virgin.
Wow! Magic!
No..if she is in a fertile phase she will conceve. This can be done while she is sedated and she will never know otherwise, unless told, how she became to be "mysteriously" with child. Room there for alot of brainwashing and other trickery.....depending on what one would desire said virgin to believe. Also virgin births were applied to many leaders/rulers and mystics etcetera, in ancient times. This was a common thing to do.....giving divine parentage to a Caesar and so forth.
So....what was your question?

posted March 18, 2006 09:16 AM         

The "principle of simplicity", the "KISS principle"
(Keep It Simple, Stupid),

Sooooo....
KISS

posted March 18, 2006 09:19 AM         

I guess in way these guestions have been anwered by us already..in various forums ..

Mary and Roman soldier..he was carrying the seed of David. ...was he an alien? No!
aliens cannot mate with us..simple as that!
Makes for good stories..you know like the media is doing to the government!

I guess ask exactly what you want to know..
I think we can all agree..that we have all read many many books..
but til go within and tap into the divine force..God
then we are just guessing..

Satan and Lucifer-Devil..are two separate individual's 5 couples..5 Garden Eden..someone got bored..

and I'll say it again..the serpent is just a symbol for you know what..they thought they were so clever..hehe..I guess they were..lol

posted March 18, 2006 09:24 AM         

I'll throw this in for my point..the saints and angels are us..and most are here on Earth NOW!
this is the time of the Great Awakening..

posted March 18, 2006 10:03 AM         

An amusing bit from "Other Worlds" written in about 1650 by Savinien Cyrano de Bergerac, a thirty-one-year-old poet, ex-soldier and amateur philosopher.

Chapter 2
The earthly paradise
___________________________
'Yes, indeed,' I said, interrupting him, 'I have noticed how, as this serpent is always trying to escape from man's body, you can see its head and neck emerging at the bottom of our bellies. Furthermore, God does not suffer man alone to be tormented by it: it was His will that it should rise up against women to inject its poison into her and that the swelling should last for nine months after the bite. And the proof that I speak according to the word of the Lord is that He curses the serpent, saying that in vain will it cause a woman to stumble by hardening itself against her, for in the end she will bruise its head.'

~~~~Genesis 3:15 And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed; it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel.~~~~