Posts: 420
From: aspideronmars
Registered: Apr 2009

posted January 18, 2009 06:40 PM         

---

Can l have views on this composite please?

I just would like to know if it's a good, ok or great composite and any pitfalls !

IP: Logged

Posts: 420
From: aspideronmars
Registered: Apr 2009

posted January 18, 2009 07:50 PM         

---

venus conj mars seems good and mercury conj sun
eros trine psyche

not sure about moon in 6th although in equal venus/mars are in 7th

IP: Logged

Posts: 247
From:
Registered: May 2009

posted January 18, 2009 08:02 PM         

---

I've always noticed Mercury first in composites for some reason... it seems like it's very sweet here, the communication seems gentle, but also intense.

IP: Logged

Posts: 24
From:
Registered: Apr 2009

posted January 18, 2009 08:28 PM         

---

mercury conjunct sun in composite IMO does not mean anything cz if you will notice by matematical logic, sun and mercury will always falls v close in mid point composites. the reason is that mercury is always in the sun sign or + - 1 sign. fr example fr leo sun only options for mercury are cancer, leo and virgo. Thus, when you will calculate composite by mid point method, sun and mercury will always be v close...generally close enf to form a conjunct....

this is the reason i dont like composites...many things are just mathematical certainites....therefore davison probably makes more sense ....(if one has to use composite at all...i dont in general like composites...)

IP: Logged

Posts: 4
From: Falls Church, VA, USA
Registered: Apr 2009

posted January 18, 2009 08:47 PM         

---

Emma, I LOOOOOOOOOVE composites. I think they definitely show the outcome of the relationship really well. I've gone back and forth on Davison or Mid Point though. Usually I look at both.

Anyway, Venus/Mars conjunction in the 8th is very promising for a deep sexual relationship, as is Eros trine Psyche! The chart ruler is in the 9th, so you will help each other reach broader levels of thinking.

IP: Logged

Posts: 247
From:
Registered: May 2009

posted January 18, 2009 09:15 PM         

---

I just don't get Davidson. It's so weird and I've never liked it.
I don't even bother with composites unless it's to look at the planets and how they cluster and where (if they're too scattered, it tends to make the couple feel like they're neither here nor there) and to see if any of the planets are unaspected.
However, the Mercury seems to almost always work for me when I look at the sign it's in, because it feels like it talks about the communication style of the relationship, and I've almost always found it to be true.

IP: Logged

Posts: 420
From: aspideronmars
Registered: Apr 2009

posted January 19, 2009 03:44 AM         

---

So is it a good composite or do I post a davison! :d

IP: Logged

Posts: 420
From: aspideronmars
Registered: Apr 2009

posted January 19, 2009 05:06 AM         

---

For Emma

IP: Logged

Posts: 420
From: aspideronmars
Registered: Apr 2009

posted January 19, 2009 05:10 AM         

---

Thanks amowls

IP: Logged

posted January 19, 2009 06:20 AM           

---

1. Pluto is Retrograde and opposing Mercury exact. This will cause communication gaps and controlling issues.

2. True Node squares Vertex. This is a warning that this is a fated meeting that need not have a happy ending.

3. Karma is retrograde and opposed to Mars and Venus in Pisces. This is a Red Flag indicating sexual secrets.

4. Retrograde Uranus is exactly opposed to Chiron. Sudden hurts are possible, shall I say sudden wounds to the heart from piercing comments/taunts might occur.

5. Saturn squares Ascendant: Indicated further fatedness. This will cause depressing circumstances in the free flowing Leonine expressions of the relationship.

6. Retrograde Neptune squares Mars and Venus: Sexual deceit is highly probable in the relationship. Psyche is also square Neptune.

I dont like this. Usually I am a relationship optimist but I have seen 3 wonderful synastries in a row end in breakups due to just 2-3 negative aspects in composite and synastry.
When I saw 6 in a row here, I have to advise: Tread with caution without any expectations. Do not feel upset if this does not work out and feel seriously great about yourself if it does work out even for a short term.

------------------
http://www.tamsoft.co.in/articles.html

http://www.tamsoft.co.in/readings.html

http://www.tamsoft.co.in/samplereading.html

IP: Logged

Posts: 420
From: aspideronmars
Registered: Apr 2009

posted January 19, 2009 06:34 AM         

---

gulp
Thanks IQ

What if the Davison is the more accurate chart? It doesn't have any of those 6 negatives

How accurate do YOU think the composite is?

IP: Logged

Posts: 420
From: aspideronmars
Registered: Apr 2009

posted January 19, 2009 06:38 AM         

---

also, everyone in my age group will have

chiron opp uranus - all my relationships have had it!

so how does one get around that?

IP: Logged

posted January 19, 2009 10:12 AM           

---

Lara,

I think the problem with Chiron-Uranus here may be that it is VERY exact.
That high degree of exactness seems to be pretty rare.

I had that aspect in one composite, too, from Uranus on 29.0 Virgo to Chiron on 29.4 Pisces - and it was very heartbreaking for me, at least for a certain time.
But it also set some spiritual growth for me in motion.

IP: Logged

Posts: 420
From: aspideronmars
Registered: Apr 2009

posted January 19, 2009 10:29 AM         

---

ok i dig, thnks.

I just don't get how the opposition is so different from the conjunct!

Anyway, a lot of people prefer the davison so do l discount the composite for the davison? isnt a composite just midpoints anyway?

IP: Logged

Posts: 420
From: aspideronmars
Registered: Apr 2009

posted January 19, 2009 10:43 AM         

---

is this true?

Synastry to see how the two people interact with each other.
Composite to see how they appear as a couple to others.
Relationship/Davison to see the purpose of them coming together.

IP: Logged

Posts: 420
From: aspideronmars
Registered: Apr 2009

posted January 19, 2009 10:59 AM         

---

ok l looked at my davison and composite with my ex husband and the davison totally spells out our relationship and the composite does totally show how others outside the relationship saw us, so i'm going to go with that.

IP: Logged

posted January 19, 2009 11:04 AM           

---

quote:

---

Composite to see how they appear as a couple to others.

---

It also shows the dynamics and the nature of the relationship, and indicates how well the relationship will function.

edit:
As you can tell from the interpretations on Astro.com for example, composite is hardly just "the outsiders' view"

IP: Logged

Posts: 420
From: aspideronmars
Registered: Apr 2009

posted January 19, 2009 11:05 AM         

---

Thanks Nightjar - l got that quote from a website and several other websites seem to say the same thing!

hmmmm

IP: Logged

Posts: 4
From: Falls Church, VA, USA
Registered: Apr 2009

posted January 19, 2009 01:35 PM         

---

Lara is the first one a Davison?

Retrograde planets shouldn't exist in mid point composites since they are not of a real time and place. If the planets are listed as retrograde, I think that's just a mistake in the software.

IP: Logged

Posts: 420
From: aspideronmars
Registered: Apr 2009

posted January 19, 2009 02:05 PM         

---

2nd one is a davison thanks amowls

IP: Logged

posted January 19, 2009 02:18 PM           

---

Just a doubt- what happens if you have 9 planets distributed in just 2 houses in a davison-uncorrected chart and Saturn in opposition to 2-3 of them?
what kind of a relationship would that be with one side of the chart having 9 planets around the Asc and just Saturn, Chiron, NN and Dsc in other houses?

IP: Logged

Posts: 247
From:
Registered: May 2009

posted January 19, 2009 02:20 PM         

---

It's usually best when the planets cluster, then there's more of a 'theme' I've found, funny face.
It's when they're too scattered that it becomes a little harder.
Just my experience anyway...

IP: Logged

Posts: 420
From: aspideronmars
Registered: Apr 2009

posted January 19, 2009 02:23 PM         

---

MVM, they are pretty clustered though!
no?
I mean mostly in 3 houses

IP: Logged

posted January 19, 2009 02:28 PM           

---

MVM, Thanks,
I was reading the other thread on composites and there was a quote where one lady said Mars square Sun and Mars square Mercury in a regular composite killed her relationship with her husband. I thought that the composite showed areas which needed work, Is it possible that the marriage collapse because of the squares? Why is Mars square Sun and Merc so bad?

IP: Logged

Posts: 229
From: Pleasanton, CA
Registered: Apr 2009

posted January 19, 2009 02:32 PM         

---

I'd like the orbs reduced to 70 - 75% in the first one. It's showing a square between Moon and Saturn that is really too wide.

I'd say that with the Sun and Mercury in the 9th, Sun in a fire sign, Ascendant in a fire sign, and Uranus opposing the Sun...this isn't going to be a very watery kind of relationship. It's going to have a fairly masculine tone.

I'd like to hear what you make of the Neptune squaring Venus and Mars.

IP: Logged