posted July 06, 2009 10:32 PM         

"Seriously, amowls! I am genuinely shocked, as well as repulsed...not so much that there would be a grandiose whacko who thinks she's the Queen of Sheba (metaphorically speaking) posting incomprehensible abuse in creepy syntax--that seems de rigeur for any online forum--but that that person would have avid supporters on the site, who enjoy that sort of approach to communicating and/or learning astrology.
I think it's turning quite a few people off...I notice various threads lately where people are taking their leave from the site."

Your opinion, you're entitled to it, let's establish that from the start, let's also establish that I dont know Venus, I supported her simply because she stood up to Glaucus and yourself on the "India's thread" and put you both in your place, I like that sort of thing when communicating with "Empty ego's". This is not about Glaucus, I am done with that already and I am sick of repeating his name however you can't seem to let go already.

Having said that, I believe that you yourself are a "Grandiose Whacko" in this place, I wouldn't go as far as calling you "Queen of Sheeba" though, you are way below that, you are dying to come across as nonbiased but you are already on Glaucus's side in this which is also fine.

Venus did not post any abuse in "Creepy syntax", the indirect abuse came from both you and Glaucus on the "India thread" by demeaning and putting down an entire country add the fact that you can't stand the fact that she replied to you the way that she did (Since you are a big astrologer on this website LMFAO) As if.

Last but not least, I love how you always give yourself the right to talk like you are a representative of everyone on this site when you say "I think it's turning quite a few people off...I notice various threads lately where people are taking their leave from the site" I dont recall anyone leaving except for Kismet who had her own reasons, unless Glaucus is everyone to you then that's a different story.

Many people on the "India" and "Michael Jackson" thread opposed his and your point of view and were also hurt by your pathetic remarks, It is beyond me why you can't see that for yourself, again, because you are biased and you want things to go your way.

Now they can lock this thread too and ex my handle like they did the other thread because we voiced our opinion which is somehting only a few like you and Glaucus can get away with apparently on this site but it doesn't really matter, and if it did I wouldn't have started this here thread.

This site is not my life like it is yours and there are a million other forums about astrology where people can simply have a good time without dealing with the likes of you or Glaucus, one has personal issues and deems it necessary to jump at every opportunity to bring them out for sympathy and the other thinks she has the privilege to talk down to people just because she knows some freaking synastry and researched a few things ... Get real with your "Holier than thou attitude".

Next time if you want to address me just do so directly and save yourself the hassle.

By the way, it is spelled "De Rigueur" missy not "De Riguer", unless you want to change it to "Freedom Fries" too, they'd probably allow you to do so here

posted July 06, 2009 11:00 PM         

For having a brain.

This forum is being systematically denigrated and peed on by TROLLS with no objective but to derail discussions for their own nauseating psycholgy.

Randall and the others,

Please some interventions ???

posted July 06, 2009 11:02 PM         

<<Whispering, I am a guy>> LOL and nice to meet you too.

posted July 06, 2009 11:06 PM         

Take two doses of pride and call me in the morning.

As you were....

posted July 06, 2009 11:08 PM         

quote:

---

Seriously, amowls! I am genuinely shocked, as well as repulsed...not so much that there would be a grandiose whacko who thinks she's the Queen of Sheba (metaphorically speaking) posting incomprehensible abuse in creepy syntax--that seems de rigeur for any online forum--but that that person would have avid supporters on the site, who enjoy that sort of approach to communicating and/or learning astrology.

---

funny aint it, if YOU and mr. Dyspraxia were the sane ones, you'd think ALL posts anf threads that have to with astrology would be by you two.

But guess what ???

NOT.

What are YOUR contributions ??

NONE..

and thank you for running away from the forum with your tail between your legs, cats do that sometimes when they cant stand up to a lioness...grrr.....

THE ONLY DELUDED ONE IS YOU, BABY.

and look, people other than me are kicking you and Glaucus - who has a histroy of getting kicked and quitting .

wait,.....glaucus....is this you ???

Even if not, i totally understand your frustration with getting a thorough whooping on the back in that thread for your ignorance, .

But pluuuuleeeseee dont give me such publicity in threads that have nothing to do with me....what you are doing by envying me is taking my karma on your head by wanting to be me...hehehheh

And what pray Lucia are YOUR contributions to this forum that you should raise qsns about MY follwing on this site ?

seriously, girl if you are NOT a troll , do clear thta one.

Lucia, if i were you i would stick this on the mirror girl

This site is not my life like it is yours and there are a million other forums about astrology where people can simply have a good time without dealing with the likes of you or Glaucus, one has personal issues and the other thinks she has the privilege to talk down to people just because she knows some freaking synastry and researched a few things ... Get real.

posted July 06, 2009 11:17 PM         

Do we really need another Knowflake slinging thread? Makes me think of a really strange episode of the Big Brother show - when we've been living together confined a little too long and people are losing it with each other.

There's what? 50 or 60 of us here. Such a small number of (spiritual?) people should be able to hold some semblance of peace.

posted July 06, 2009 11:23 PM         

The subject was dropped when Linda locked the thread about Glaucus, it was Miss Holier than Thou who had to take a cheap shot and bring it all up again because her ego is too fragile and she needs to fill it with air every now and then.

I am not one to resort to innuendos when addressing people, if I want to talk I will talk directly to the person I have an issue with in this case Lucia 23 therefore I addressed her directly, I also believe harmony is not a common place that you just arrive to, there must be some hurdles to address prior to the fact.

My apologies to everyone on LL but I had to reply in a polite "Virgoan" manner or else I wouldn't have supposedly been living to the essense of my sun sign (Discrimination) <<<Batting my eye lashes>>> and next time we'll come over PA provided you got the food and drinks

posted July 06, 2009 11:32 PM         

Thanks. I do understand. I think, generally, people are just getting sick of the sledging this week. It's been going strong since Michael Jackson died and all those threads started and it's just starting to have some wear and tear.

If you're going to venture over to LLC - and you're bringing some goodies - I expect the good stuff!

posted July 07, 2009 02:20 AM         

You think you're a smart guy, right? Aren't you being a bit ironic in claiming someone else has a "Holier than thou" attitude? Get real, guy.

quote:

---

I am not one to resort to innuendos when addressing people, if I want to talk I will talk directly to the person I have an issue with in this case Lucia 23 therefore I addressed her directly,

---

If you know it's YOU that's being talked about, it isn't innuendo, is it? And how exactly is it a cheap shot if you're able to address it?

I personally love this notion that somehow you're better for dealing with people directly. The implication is that someone who'd talk behind your back is weak. And yet, here you are being all thin-skinned and getting your feathers ruffled over people talking about you without talking to you directly. How sensitive is that? People are going to talk about you regardless of whether you're present. It's just a fact of life. You're never ever going to get everyone to direct their ire directly towards you. They may not be able to tolerate talking to you in the first place. You might rub them the wrong way. Why should they be compelled to speak to you?

VenusDeLionesse,

If you don't like the "trolls" do the LOGICAL thing and take off. It's a very easily remedied situation.

and thank you for running away from the forum with your tail between your legs, cats do that sometimes when they cant stand up to a lioness...grrr.....

Who the do you think you are? If you want to talk delusion, you better get a mirror out.

posted July 07, 2009 02:52 AM         

quote:

---

I hear you've been looking into past lives lately. Past lives aren't limited to the past. They're also concurrent, so the people who you consider trolls may actually be other incarnations of yourself.

---

Annnddd YOU are NOT deluded about who YOU are - to claim something like that about a stranger...

quote:

---

Who the do you think you are? If you want to talk delusion, you better get a mirror out.

---

So i cant address someone who's been trolling me and calling me names without the old moderator who loves talking about people behind their backs defending them

Who needs a mirror ?

Atleast have more class than to talk about others behind their backs on threads that have nothing to do with them.

And where were you when the same person was calling me and other members names.

This is just a personal rant Azalaksh - not a mod's duty you are doing.

posted July 07, 2009 03:41 AM         

I am not now nor have I ever been a Moderator at this site. You can address who you like, but if you want to get cocky and unreasonable about it don't be surprised if you're taken to task.

quote:

---

Atleast have more class than to talk about others behind their backs on threads that have nothing to do with them.

---

There's an easy solution if you want to stop people from talking behind your back: Don't give them reason to. Simple.

There's also a simple, zen-like solution for dealing with people talking behind your back: Get over it.

posted July 07, 2009 10:34 AM         

I had a few issues to address with someone and I did.

End of story.

Thanks.

Acoustic midget

The argument went right over your head

Here is something for you to ponder:

In·nu·en·do: An oblique hint; a remote allusion or reference, usually derogatory to a person or thing NOT NAMED; an insinuation.

An innuendo is an equivocal allusion so framed as to point distinctly at something which is injurious to the character or reputation of the person referred to. An insinuation turns on no such double use of language, but consists in artfully winding into the mind imputations of an injurious nature without making any direct charge.

"If you know it's YOU that's being talked about, it isn't innuendo, is it"

That's a very stupid question that doesn't deserve a reply from me my Mercury in Virgo wouldn't even allow me to stoop to that level when debating.

Am I better for dealing with people directly?
You bet I am. It beats making innuendos

"They may not be able to tolerate talking to you in the first place. You might rub them the wrong way. Why should they be compelled to speak to you?"

I dont recall ever rubbing Lucia23 the wrong way (She's not my type), but I understand where you're coming from, it's Ok to be spineless and talk about people behind their back thinking you're smart rather than addressing your issue with them and reach a common place

As for what you said to Venus:
"do the LOGICAL thing and take off"

I dont think this site is registered under your mother's name for you to tell people to take off, or is it?

Then you ask her "Who do you think you are"?

LMAO

Regards

posted July 07, 2009 10:57 AM         

quote:

---

Acoustic midget

---

Nice.

posted July 07, 2009 11:06 AM         

quote:

---

The argument went right over your head

---

No it didn't. He just found an obvious hole in your diatribe.

It's really tacky that you have to stoop to name calling in almost every post of yours, and on top of that you have a weird arrogance about you. You co-opt every bad thing that is ever said about Virgos (or about other signs and then attribute it to Virgos) and then act like it's cool or enviable. That's why I never liked you much to begin with. Even your choice of words shows your ignorance about the world around you (ie calling Glaucus "ghetto," AG a "midget"). No wonder you have such an affinity for VenusDeLioness, since she also seems to be ignorant of race, class and sex issues (which is so weird since she is supposedly a counselor to abused women).

posted July 07, 2009 11:08 AM         

quote:

---

Guy's no offense but after this post I wont be replying to anyone who posts to this thread unless I feel like they are worthy of a reply or have genuine questions for me to answer.

---

posted July 07, 2009 11:40 AM         

If you can easily detect that it is YOU that is being spoken of, then it's not exactly indirect, is it? If you recognize yourself in what is being spoken, and there's no doubt about it in your mind, it's as good as direct in my book. If, on the other hand, you weren't sure if you were the one being talked about, then I could understand the use of the word "innuendo." Does your Mercury in Virgo grasp that?

quote:

---

You bet I am. It beats making innuendos

---

How?

quote:

---

it's Ok to be spineless and talk about people behind their back thinking you're smart rather than addressing your issue with them and reach a common place

---

I'd say that there's a remarkable similarity between those willing to talk behind your back within earshot, and those who drop a few criticisms accompanied by a statement that you won't be posting anymore. It would seem that you're trying to avoid confrontation as much as those you consider spineless.

quote:

---

I dont think this site is registered under your mother's name for you to tell people to take off, or is it?

---

posted July 07, 2009 11:55 AM         

I wonder why?

I don't speak ebonics. I actually speak very proper English,and that's because of my speech therapy in my early elementary school years to correct my speech problems (both Dyspraxic-Dyslexic related). I have even been accused of talking/acting too white or not being black enough. shrugs....I am the offspring of white parent and black parent any way. but then again, I don't believe in racial stereotypes.
I have never been in jail nor prison.
I don't drink,do drugs,nor do I sleep around.
I have no criminal record.
I don't sag with my clothes.
I don't even like Rap music....especially don't like gangsta rap.
I don't use words like "b-tches and Hoes" and bling.
I don't wear a gold tooth (Transformers' Jar Jar bots....trying to throw in some humor)

I am not into street fights, but I used to wish duels were legal....because I was reading too many books about Arthurian Legends,knights,and things like trial by combat, and sword fights.....I believe that I had a pastlife as a knight, especially fighting in the crusades...I dressed as a knight for halloween when I was 10 with the knight stuff that my stepfather got me for my birthday because he knew about my strong interest in that stuff)

I do believe in the concept of self-defense that my stepfather taught me when I was little. I got bullied a lot as a kid because I was in special ed. He told me "if somebody hits you, hit him back"
I followed his advice. I was suspended from school 5 times for fighting for defending myself and standing up to people.
I have defended myself verbally too.
I don't believe in martyr and being anybody's doormat. In other words, "I don't take people's sh-t and not do anything about it"

Eckhart Tolle's book, A New Earth made me realize that it is best to walk away and not say anything.

or like Eckhart Tolle advised. Don't put up resistance. Just be with present moment.
respond with negative accusations "is that so" It doesn't mean being a martyr nor anybody's doormat. It doesn't mean confirming that person's belief in what they accuse you of.

it seems that other people have defended me in this forum, and I am grateful to them for that.

transiting Mars in Taurus is in my 9th house, and it's almost 1 degree separation square from my Mars in Aquarius in 6th. I wanted to take a break to keep myself from losing my temper and being aggressive. I did just that. I didn't feel like I have to fight back because that could lead to my being too passionate for my own good and can lead to anger and hate.

I live in Oak Park area in Sacramento,California. It's a predominantly black neighborhood, but it's been cleaned up quite a bit. Oak Park native,Mayor Kevin Johnson had something to do with that.

I am far from ghetto.

my friend,AG is no midget either.

Raymond

------------------
“It is absolutely the perfect name,” Dr. Brown said, given the continuing discord among astronomers and the public over whether Pluto should have retained its planetary status.

In mythology, Eris ignited discord that led to the Trojan War.

posted July 07, 2009 12:07 PM         

I am not going to address your comments and if it werent that Virgooh was being targeted for siding with me i would have bypasses your shitefest.

To think and Azalaksh and AG , are entering a fight that had nothing to do with them to promote themseleve as the torchbearers of what is right and wrong.

words Azalaksh and AG.

Kindred Spirits.

I am being shown the mirror by two amoral hypocrites who went and created another forum for the exclusive purope of b1tching about LL and knowflakes behind their backs - so as to be free of the responsiibilities of civility in conversation.

Knowing that its unrealistic to the point of stupidity that you two have any concept of right and wrong , so as to have any sense of moral judgement about an individual talking about another behind their backs .

But you'll have no problems in moralising the person who is being assaulted behing his / her back .

I am still trying to process the convulating psychology that goes into such levels of amoral intellectualisation.

Kudos to you two.

Azlaksh - for someone your sge, one expects more sophistication than the standard troll 101 -

Namely , concentrating on a aprt of a post to make your judgement while leaving out the essence , the context and the posts to which it is a response to.

Its okay for Lucia to call me names but i cant call myself a lioness ?

And who are YOU to tell me that cat-lady. ?

If Lucia knew she was RIGHT she would have told me what she wanted in that thread itself instead of skulking off to other threads to demean me.

She did DARE to say those things in a thread in which i was active becasue she knew i wold tear her down.

In which respect she beats Glaucus who says he is divergent - atleast he says what he wants on your face .Because he feels he is right.

All the members who have been attacking BEHIND my back on threads i am not active on - are the same ones i put in their place in that India thread.

Yet i am the one who Azalksh and AG need to disipline

Selective morality at its hypocritical best.