|
Author
|
Topic: Miscarriage a crime????????????
|
Oliviaaa Knowflake Posts: 162 From: Registered: Jul 2011
|
posted April 24, 2012 02:57 PM
quote: Originally posted by YoursTrulyAlways: I'm both a conservative and a Christian. I don't know about being a social conservative. Like I mentioned, I believe that the government ought to focus on performing its traditional role, which it is already woefully failing. There is no place got government interference in the individual life decisions in an open democracy. Anyway, I don't like labels. Please refrain from suggesting that a certain class of individuals are uneducated or need to be educated. I received the best education one can receive and more than triple my fair share. Please understand that such insults constitute mud slinging and are blatantly unfair.
And it brings the level of discourse down, also. No need to stoop to such a level to make a point. You don't help your case in anyway by doing that, either. We can all stay on the high road.  IP: Logged |
Aquacheeka Knowflake Posts: 651 From: Toronto, Canada Registered: Mar 2012
|
posted April 24, 2012 03:15 PM
quote: Originally posted by YoursTrulyAlways: I'm both a conservative and a Christian. I don't know about being a social conservative. Like I mentioned, I believe that the government ought to focus on performing its traditional role, which it is already woefully failing. There is no place got government interference in the individual life decisions in an open democracy. Anyway, I don't like labels. Please refrain from suggesting that a certain class of individuals are uneducated or need to be educated. I received the best education one can receive and more than triple my fair share. Please understand that such insults constitute mud slinging and are blatantly unfair.
Keep in mind, YTA, if you are socially liberal but fiscally conservative and your description indicates that you seem to be, in the strictest possible sense you are actually Libertarian (I've actually studied political spectrums). Conservatism in its rawest sense means support of government limitations/interference on social and democratic freedoms; really, all those but the right to bear arms, the same way that liberals support government interference in an economic sense/Keynesian policies.
Libertarians are glorified constitutionalists; they think the only job government has is prosecuting criminals/those who interfere with "life, liberty, pursuit of happiness" ideal, and delivering mail. So there may very well be very little actual reason for you to even take offense. You're focusing on the semantics. IP: Logged |
YoursTrulyAlways Knowflake Posts: 2419 From: Registered: Oct 2011
|
posted April 24, 2012 03:32 PM
quote: Originally posted by Aquacheeka: I would also add that fiscal conservatives in particular do not perform more poorly on exams than their liberal counterparts, in stark contrast to social conservatives. They are the accountants, as opposed to the military commanders.
Much of my family isn't American. However, I'll let it be known that my cousin is a Major General and a military aviator. Coming to my point, not only is he educated but he is excessively so. Royal Sandhurst Academy, Cambridge University Masters, Harvard Masters in Public Administration, MIT PhD in Electrical Engineering, Stanford MBA. All with high distinction. I am myself a Major. I am US Army Ranger trained. I have an Ivy League college education, a Masters in Economics, a MBA and a Masters in International Affairs. My younger brother is a Lieutenant Colonel and an artillery commander. He has a Columbia BA, a Yale Masters and a Harvard MBA. Did I hear you say that the military lacks education? IP: Logged |
Aquacheeka Knowflake Posts: 651 From: Toronto, Canada Registered: Mar 2012
|
posted April 24, 2012 03:41 PM
quote: Originally posted by YoursTrulyAlways: Much of my family isn't American. However, I'll let it be known that my cousin is a Major General and a military aviator. Coming to my point, not only is he educated but he is excessively so. Royal Sandhurst Academy, Cambridge University Masters, Harvard Masters in Public Administration, MIT PhD in Electrical Engineering, Stanford MBA. All with high distinction. I am myself a Major. I am US Army Ranger trained. I have an Ivy League college education, a Masters in Economics, a MBA and a Masters in International Affairs. My younger brother is a Lieutenant Colonel and an artillery commander. He has a Columbia BA, a Yale Masters and a Harvard MBA. Did I hear you say that the military lacks education?
(sigh) YTA, I cannot reason with someone who is determined to take offense. I already explained to you the basis of my assertion. I am by no means saying that ALL conservatives are uneducated, but if you want to compare macro-level groups (if you're insistent upon doing so), are military personnelle more educated as a group than scientists? Because the former skews conservative and the latter overwhelmingly skews liberal. Furthermore, an example of a far-left public institution is Harvard University. An example of a far-right public institution is Bob Jones University and they teach creationism.
To say that people who self-identify as liberal more consistently have postsecondary education is by no means to suggest that ALL people who self-identify as conservatives lack higher education. If you want to take everything I say as a personal insult, you can by all means do so. Or you can take a breath, detach yourself objectively, and maybe take a look at the following studies: http://news.yahoo.com/low-iq-conservative-beliefs-linked-prejudice-180403506.html http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-big-questions/201002/conservatism-linke d-lack-education http://articles.cnn.com/2010-02-26/health/l iberals.atheists.sex.intelligence_1_sexual-behaviors-liberalism-exclusivity?_s=PM:HEALTH http://www.huffingtonpost.com/harlan-green/wealthiest-states_b_1286389.html and perhaps consider that my statement is a generalization, yes, based on fact, yes, a personal attack? Of course not.
IP: Logged |
Aquacheeka Knowflake Posts: 651 From: Toronto, Canada Registered: Mar 2012
|
posted April 24, 2012 03:47 PM
My only intent with the follow-up post that you cited was only to clarify that I do understand that social conservatives and fiscal conservatives have different mandates and as such, I regard them differently. It is a disservice and an oversimplification to simply say "conservatives" when they fall into different camps. Oftentimes libertarians will identify as conservatives because their fiscal policy has more in common with conservatives than the liberal policy; that, however, does not mean that they agree with the radical and archaic views orchestrated by the right. So I do understand that and that was the only purpose of that post.IP: Logged |
YoursTrulyAlways Knowflake Posts: 2419 From: Registered: Oct 2011
|
posted April 24, 2012 04:03 PM
I understand that and appreciate what you are doing. However, I don't identify myself with the Libertarian crowd and I'm at tremendous odds with Ron Paul and would never vote for him. Therefore, I'm a fiscal conservative with strong Christian views, but I'm not going to be in your face like what is regarded as a social conservative. I'm not ideologically driven. I'm driven by the bottom line. My neighbor has been unemployed for 14 months. I just paid $4.55 per gallon today at the gas station. College for my son costs $65K a year today. My real wage per unit of labor (how much more unconservative can I get?) is declining. We are engaged in three wars with no mission for success or an exit strategy. Will Mitt do any better? Who knows. Probably not. But there are too many things on my mind that affect our real lives than to worry about some arcane laws from some sleazoid politicians. IP: Logged |
Aquacheeka Knowflake Posts: 651 From: Toronto, Canada Registered: Mar 2012
|
posted April 24, 2012 04:08 PM
quote: Originally posted by YoursTrulyAlways: I understand that and appreciate what you are doing. However, I don't identify myself with the Libertarian crowd and I'm at tremendous odds with Ron Paul and would never vote for him. Therefore, I'm a fiscal conservative with strong Christian views, but I'm not going to be in your face like what is regarded as a social conservative. I'm not ideologically driven. I'm driven by the bottom line. My neighbor has been unemployed for 14 months. I just paid $4.55 per gallon today at the gas station. College for my son costs $65K a year today. My real wage per unit of labor (how much more unconservative can I get?) is declining. We are engaged in three wars with no mission for success or an exit strategy. Will Mitt do any better? Who knows. Probably not. But there are too many things on my mind that affect our real lives than to worry about some arcane laws from some sleazoid politicians.
Well if you're anti-war then you're also far more libertarian than you realize. Have you taken a political spectrum test? I have and I scored smack dab in the middle of liberal; moderate liberal (not closer to centre OR to the far-left). Generally speaking, I adhere strongly to liberal ideologies but I think taken to the extreme they can be just as asinine and advocate linguistic/cultural suicide or state bankruptcy (Massachusetts is a good example of this with their overly-generous welfare policies). But I live in Toronto so my affiliations make logical sense.
IP: Logged |
Aquacheeka Knowflake Posts: 651 From: Toronto, Canada Registered: Mar 2012
|
posted April 24, 2012 04:25 PM
YTA, when you say strong Christian views, do you mean embryo personhood, anti-SSM, I guess I seek clarification because with conservatives you never know if they want to separate church and state or impose their will/religious agenda ON the state. Or is it a mere case of you have your own views but don't think the government has any business interfering in personal lives, with women's bodies, etc.?IP: Logged |
YoursTrulyAlways Knowflake Posts: 2419 From: Registered: Oct 2011
|
posted April 24, 2012 04:35 PM
I'm not anti war. However, I don't like some of the rationale behind US engagements and I definitely dislike how wars are prosecuted. Unfortunately, wars are an ugly necessity and the military is only an instrument of policy. The military isn't to blame. It's the politicians that are to be blamed. So, I'm not altogether a global hawk but I'm all for protecting the geo-economic strategic interests and homeland security. IP: Logged |
Lonake Moderator Posts: 7363 From: Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted April 24, 2012 04:36 PM
quote: Originally posted by Oliviaaa: You don't help your case in anyway
Agreed. There's no need to refer to a group of people as inhuman.IP: Logged |
Aquacheeka Knowflake Posts: 651 From: Toronto, Canada Registered: Mar 2012
|
posted April 24, 2012 04:50 PM
46% of Mississippi Republicans want interracial marriage banned: http://www.aolnews.com/2011/04/08/46-percent-of-mississippi-republicans-want -interracial-marriage/ So it would seem that Republicans and I don't agree on what constitutes "human."
Beyond that, I'm not trying to make a case. I don't really care all that much who agrees with me or not. I have my views and am very proud of them; they are in line with my personal ethics and that is good enough for me. IP: Logged |
YoursTrulyAlways Knowflake Posts: 2419 From: Registered: Oct 2011
|
posted April 24, 2012 04:58 PM
And I'm in an inter-racial marriage myself and I'm a conservative. IP: Logged |
Aquacheeka Knowflake Posts: 651 From: Toronto, Canada Registered: Mar 2012
|
posted April 24, 2012 05:00 PM
quote: Originally posted by YoursTrulyAlways: And I'm in an inter-racial marriage myself and I'm a conservative.
I never said that ALL conservatives are opposed or xenophobic, just as I never said there's no such thing as an educated conservative. Just averages 
IP: Logged |
Ami Anne Moderator Posts: 31243 From: Pluto/house next to NickiG Registered: Sep 2010
|
posted April 24, 2012 05:26 PM
quote: Originally posted by YoursTrulyAlways: And I'm in an inter-racial marriage myself and I'm a conservative.
------------------ Passion, Lust, Desire. Check out my journal http://www.mychristianpsychic.com/
IP: Logged |
Ami Anne Moderator Posts: 31243 From: Pluto/house next to NickiG Registered: Sep 2010
|
posted April 24, 2012 05:27 PM
quote: Originally posted by YoursTrulyAlways: Much of my family isn't American. However, I'll let it be known that my cousin is a Major General and a military aviator. Coming to my point, not only is he educated but he is excessively so. Royal Sandhurst Academy, Cambridge University Masters, Harvard Masters in Public Administration, MIT PhD in Electrical Engineering, Stanford MBA. All with high distinction. I am myself a Major. I am US Army Ranger trained. I have an Ivy League college education, a Masters in Economics, a MBA and a Masters in International Affairs. My younger brother is a Lieutenant Colonel and an artillery commander. He has a Columbia BA, a Yale Masters and a Harvard MBA. Did I hear you say that the military lacks education?
 IP: Logged |
Aquacheeka Knowflake Posts: 651 From: Toronto, Canada Registered: Mar 2012
|
posted April 24, 2012 05:37 PM
46% does not equal ALL. However, that IS greater than the percentage who said they were not opposed (40%). YTA, to say you're playing for the wrong team is a bit of an understatement . But voting conservative is a tradition in military families, I understand that. They vote in favour of their economic interests and Republicans are the ones who want the biggest military budget.IP: Logged |
Lexxigramer Moderator Posts: 637 From: The Etheric Realms.....Still out looking for Schrodinger's cat.... Registered: Feb 2012
|
posted April 24, 2012 05:48 PM
I see and relate to what Aquacheeka has said. If anyone here is NOT one of the extremists she is talking about, then kindly chill out and do not act/be offended. If the shoes do NOT fit you, than please calm down. However if you defend any of the extremist views , than the shoe fits to a degree.  It is hard to discuss such issues and while Aquacheeka is being blunt and appears to some degree to be at first putting all Republicans etc., under the same banner, she HAS tried to explain that she does not mean to sound like she is labeling all the same.This topic is going off tract from the topic of; Miscarriage a crime???????????? I will close this thread if people keep getting offended. If one is offended than maybe they feel guilty on some level? If not, than chill out and accept that no one here is being labeled a bad conservative or Republican or Christian; so unless you are indeed guilty, chill out.  IP: Logged |
PixieJane Knowflake Posts: 364 From: CA Registered: Oct 2010
|
posted April 24, 2012 05:52 PM
quote: Originally posted by Aquacheeka: I would welcome the opportunity to broaden my experiences. I would love to meet one - just one - Republican who was not a purveyor of misinformation (for example, espousing the factually inaccurate myth that homosexuality is a "choice" and so gays should not be allowed to get married). It's my hope that I may one day do so. If there are indeed Republicans who disagree with these doctrines and the direction that the party is going, I wish they would have the courage to stand up and vocally oppose these messages.
Here's one: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VAOkwjQdm6Q  And think about it, he supports FULL equality. Not even President Obama (who has been the best POTUS the gay community has ever had) is that enlightened. Granted, I doubt he'll ever be more than a mayor. The evangelicals really gnashed their teeth when he made that speech. I'm thinking of replying to someone else, too, but I'd need to do a net search and verify what I think and I don't have time to do that yet, so I'm just throwing that out there just in case this thread becomes the latest thread to get locked because of hissy fits before I can get back to this. 
IP: Logged |
Aquacheeka Knowflake Posts: 651 From: Toronto, Canada Registered: Mar 2012
|
posted April 24, 2012 06:15 PM
quote: Originally posted by PixieJane: Here's one: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VAOkwjQdm6Q  And think about it, he supports FULL equality. Not even President Obama (who has been the best POTUS the gay community has ever had) is that enlightened. Granted, I doubt he'll ever be more than a mayor. The evangelicals really gnashed their teeth when he made that speech. I'm thinking of replying to someone else, too, but I'd need to do a net search and verify what I think and I don't have time to do that yet, so I'm just throwing that out there just in case this thread becomes the latest thread to get locked because of hissy fits before I can get back to this. 
What a wonderful example It's really inspiring that he took that route instead of the hypocritical stance taken by so, so many Republicans (the many Republican gay sex scandals: http://www.badmouth.net/top-five-republican-gay-sex-scandals/ http://www.xtra.ca/blog/national/post/2011/08/29/Time-for-another-Republican -gay-sex-scandal!.aspx http://news.change.org/stories/yet-another-republican-gay-sex-scandal http://articles.nydailynews.com/2011-08-13/news/29902758_1_gay-marriage-craigslist-em ails Strom Thurmond having opposed civil rights for blacks while secretly fathering a mulatto child, etc.). But just because Republicans rarely meet the criteria for what I would consider "a good person" doesn't mean they're always bad politicians. Rudy Giuliani cut crime in New York City by half and he was a Republican. IP: Logged |
Aquacheeka Knowflake Posts: 651 From: Toronto, Canada Registered: Mar 2012
|
posted April 24, 2012 06:17 PM
I hope Jerry Sanders doesn't get alienated by his base for his compassionate views. They might consider him a RINO like they do with all the sane Republican politicians.IP: Logged |
YoursTrulyAlways Knowflake Posts: 2419 From: Registered: Oct 2011
|
posted April 24, 2012 06:56 PM
Sorry to put it bluntly. I'm not a woman so I have not had a miscarriage. However I have supported my wife through three miscarriages and two deaths. How many of you women (besides Ami Anne) have had children die on them or have had miscarriages? Many of you aren't even mothers. In that case, you know how absurd this legislation is. Why is there even debate over something some whackos want to legislate? IP: Logged |
Ami Anne Moderator Posts: 31243 From: Pluto/house next to NickiG Registered: Sep 2010
|
posted April 24, 2012 07:23 PM
quote: Originally posted by YoursTrulyAlways: Sorry to put it bluntly. I'm not a woman so I have not had a miscarriage. However I have supported my wife through three miscarriages and two deaths. How many of you women (besides Ami Anne) have had children die on them or have had miscarriages? Many of you aren't even mothers. In that case, you know how absurd this legislation is. Why is there even debate over something some whackos want to legislate?
Once woman have children, radical abortion viewpoints often change. I can't see a woman who has had a baby condone partial birth abortion. The whole thing makes no common sense imho
------------------ Passion, Lust, Desire. Check out my journal
http://www.mychristianpsychic.com/
IP: Logged |
Node Knowflake Posts: 1820 From: 1,981 mi East of Truth or Consequences NM Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted April 24, 2012 07:26 PM
Why the debate??Because these wackos are succeding. 10 States With the Most Shocking Anti-Woman Legislation IP: Logged |
Node Knowflake Posts: 1820 From: 1,981 mi East of Truth or Consequences NM Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted April 24, 2012 07:31 PM
off topic [slightly]personally I found the inference that Aquacheeka must be a "very hateful person" more offensive than the post itself. IP: Logged |
Ami Anne Moderator Posts: 31243 From: Pluto/house next to NickiG Registered: Sep 2010
|
posted April 24, 2012 07:40 PM
Node Did you get tired of bothering me in GU so you had to follow me here  ------------------ Passion, Lust, Desire. Check out my journal http://www.mychristianpsychic.com/
IP: Logged |