Lindaland
  Sweet Peas In The Rain
  Belongingness - lone wolf or pack member? (Page 1)

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone!
This topic is 2 pages long:   1  2 
next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Belongingness - lone wolf or pack member?
Hera
Knowflake

Posts: 8636
From: Olympus
Registered: Sep 2010

posted February 16, 2014 02:00 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Hera     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
"Belongingness is the human emotional need to be an accepted member of a group. Whether it is family, friends, co-workers, or a sports team, humans have an inherent desire to belong and be an important part of something greater than themselves. "
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Belongingness


I'm currently pondering on this. I identify mostly as an humanist/individualist and I am an entity of its own that has priority over everything else. I have troubles with belonging because I don't want to be associated with a group and lose my individual identity. I don't know why I view it like such a threat, I don't think they exclude themselves that much. I explain it mostly due to my unfortunate upbringing, believing or wanting to believe I was adopted, not identifying with my own culture and so on. I never went to reunions, proms and graduation parties. I don't follow fashion or trends. I could spend days not talking with another person, ANY person, not even online. Aquarius intercepted in the first house? Uranus in the 10th conjunct Jupiter, ruler of the 11th? Jup/Uranus trine Sun? Maybe. There is no doubt one of my greatest struggles was to assess my identity and my individuality, because they have been suppressed soon after my start in this life and I was coerced into walking a path of submission that was never mine to walk on.

However there is another side of the coin. In my few moments of searching to be a part of a group, an organization or anything alike, I have felt a greater sense of happiness, purpose and motivation. I cannot deny that. It goes deeper than having friends or a group of friends, that's not big scale enough for me, it's about being part of something important. And no, actually that is not enough either. It's about being part of something important that has a cause I strongly believe in. There's a little activist in me waiting to get out. I felt it truly for the first time at around 21 when I started doing volunteer work popularizing blood donation. I seriously considered joining Doctors without borders for a while and the thought hasn't yet left my mind completely. My career offered this sort of fulfillment for a while but in the last 2 years or so that has not been the case. I stopped believing in it, at least in the kind of work I currently do. And up until now my new found individuality was enough to shut this need off.

I think this newly acknowledged need is mostly on behalf of Moon-Neptune in the 11th. However, I still feel a sense of conflict between choosing to stay a lone wolf and joining a pack with a humanitarian purpose. That's my story, so far.

Which is yours? Which type are you? Ever struggled with any of these?

------------------
Knowflake and newflake birthday database! Join in!

This girl is on FIRE

Venus's playground

Sandpaper kisses on a cheek or a chin
That is the way for a day to begin.
Sandpaper kisses, a cuddle and a purr
I have an alarm clock that's covered in fur!

IP: Logged

charlie
Knowflake

Posts: 4745
From:
Registered: Jun 2012

posted February 16, 2014 02:38 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for charlie     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I feel bad for only being able to offer a short response in comparison to your lengthy but: I am truly happy when surrounded by strangers which renders me in a position to study them in silence. I also enjoy eating out alone, sitting in bars alone, grabbing a coffee alone etc.

IP: Logged

Hera
Knowflake

Posts: 8636
From: Olympus
Registered: Sep 2010

posted February 16, 2014 03:00 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Hera     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Charlie, from some of your posts I gather you lean more toward individualism than collectivism as well?

IP: Logged

charlie
Knowflake

Posts: 4745
From:
Registered: Jun 2012

posted February 16, 2014 03:39 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for charlie     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Hera:
Charlie, from some of your posts I gather you lean more toward individualism than collectivism as well?

I believe people tend to look for a safety net when none is really needed. I don't want to "belong" anywhere but with me. Nothing on this planet will make me like myself better if I don't like myself so I choose to walk alone although certain things point to me being better off joining forces.

I like to be the one sitting at the top of the mountain smiling while eyeing humans go through the struggles "down there". If possible, I would assist with some guidance and the knowledge behind my guidance has been earned by me learning life by trial and error, alone, and I cherish the moments when I meet someone that dared facing challenges alone and live honestly to his or her soul. Those moments of purity make me look at the sky and take a deep breath.

IP: Logged

Hera
Knowflake

Posts: 8636
From: Olympus
Registered: Sep 2010

posted February 16, 2014 03:57 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Hera     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I understand where you're coming from, Charlie. I hate depending on someone else for support, money, information, nurturance etc. I hate needing any sort of help, period. However, in my case, this is not what's pulling me towards the collective. It's mostly based on giving rather than taking, unless by taking you mean attuning to the collective (super)consciousness. I believe there is some peace within that experience, but I fear fading into it too.

IP: Logged

Sibyl
Knowflake

Posts: 917
From: Uranus
Registered: Dec 2010

posted February 16, 2014 04:43 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Sibyl     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
This is a tough one. I think maybe I'm an extremely sociable lone wolf? I have a multitude of friends and so belong not to one, but dozens of wolf packs, I would say. I'm part of a great number of social groups and it's all great, but at the same I'll head out without letting anyone know. I don't really look back to check, but sometimes they follow and sometimes they don't and I don't really mind much either way. So I would say that I'm either a sociable lone wolf or a very independent member of the wolf pack. I love being alone and I love being around other people, and don't really have a preference. It's just different kinds of enjoyments. When I'm alone I read or write all day. When I'm with others I love the companionship... But both gets boring after a while, so I need the diversity. I sometimes think though that I'm really a sociable person at heart, but that being an only child with absentee parents has forced me to enjoy my own space. Then again my aquarius sun with leo rising could also explain some things

IP: Logged

Hera
Knowflake

Posts: 8636
From: Olympus
Registered: Sep 2010

posted February 16, 2014 04:53 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Hera     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Sounds like a pretty good balance, Sibyl!

IP: Logged

Randall
Webmaster

Posts: 112665
From: From a galaxy, far, far away...
Registered: Apr 2009

posted February 16, 2014 05:49 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Randall     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Both, actually. Leader of the pack, which is often a solitary life, since a real closeness is often prohibitive.

IP: Logged

12muddy
Knowflake

Posts: 3066
From:
Registered: Feb 2013

posted February 16, 2014 06:17 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for 12muddy     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Hmmm tough one. I guess I am somewhere in between, can be both or neither. I like being both, until it becomes more trouble than it's worth. A voice in my head tells me that I can be alone, but if being a part of a group gives me better advantage/ is more productive n doesn't cost me much, why not ?

I like being a part of a group until I have enough of that and/or their activities,"purpose" and values suppress my own - time to detach. I run alone feeling content until I reach a point where I think I should join forces with others.

In the rare occasion, I meet one or two that like to run with me, so suddenly I become a part of a "pack".

Family is another matter.

Hehe I first stepped into my current work industry when I was 16. At first it felt great, I believed in the "cause". Then that feeling just faded coz I felt like they were trying to brainwash me into thinking that it's something greater than what it is. What used to inspire now fall flat.

All this talk of wolf reminds me of the story of Lobo the king of Currumpaw.

IP: Logged

Padre35
Knowflake

Posts: 3996
From: Asheville, NC, US
Registered: Jul 2012

posted February 16, 2014 08:31 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Padre35     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I'm what is known as a Sigma Hera..always an outsider and disdainful of hierarchy and social structure.

I fit in nowhere and everywhere so to speak

For me Hera, what people want from me is not $$ or skill,what is the most beneficial is..listening..want my time and company

Which is fine not productive tho

IP: Logged

Violets
unregistered
posted February 16, 2014 08:38 PM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
With Saturn in 11th and Pluto in 3rd, the only place I really fit in is in a work related environment, or social cause (in my case, one and the same).

I enjoy being a rather solitary part of that type of group, and I always have friends in that environment (most of my good friendships were formed at work).

But I'm always still just sort of doing my own thing, and prefer my privacy.

Groups of people can be gossipy, which I dislike. Also, my outer planet stuff does make me a little odd in a lot of group settings, and I don't often identify with people unless there's a very specific common interest.

If I have to be around a bunch of uptight soccer moms, for example, I just want to sit by myself and sort of be left alone. Really, I would prefer to not be there at all.

So, while I prefer to have friends who share a common theme or interest with me, I still like to be my own separate person with plenty of space. And I probably isolate myself too much, but it doesn't bother me that often.

I think I'm just super picky about who I hang out with, and I really do need a strong common interest with the people I do spend my time around. Or at least a basic understanding/communication.

Also, friendships have to be pretty convenient for me, which may be self-centered, but that's how I am. If I don't naturally see the person/group of people on a regular basis, I'm pretty bad about going out of my way to do so.

IP: Logged

YoursTrulyAlways
Knowflake

Posts: 7206
From:
Registered: Oct 2011

posted February 16, 2014 08:39 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for YoursTrulyAlways     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
.

IP: Logged

Violets
unregistered
posted February 16, 2014 08:53 PM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Also, my outer planet stuff seems to attract annoyingly weird people outside of work, so these days I tend to just hang out with my family. They're good company, for the most part.
I blow a lot of people off because they just seem too nutty, even for me. If they're above and beyond "my type of crazy", they're too much.

IP: Logged

Kerosene
unregistered
posted February 17, 2014 01:12 AM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Hmm I don't want to be a leader and have lackeys.
Followers bless them and their drooling hearts but I have no time for that.. It's boring I don't need my ego to be stroked.

I feel like people who want to be pack leaders often feel unappreciated by their peers and colleagues. No offense to anyone
I don't belong to groups because I'm NOT in HS so I surround myself with people I actually respect.

It's as simple as that, I'm not a loner because because I live in a city with a variety of different types of people who are interesting so there's really no excuse to be anti social but I have in the past.
Mainly in school but again I use to hang with people outside my school

IP: Logged

PixieJane
Knowflake

Posts: 9371
From: CA
Registered: Oct 2010

posted February 17, 2014 01:38 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for PixieJane     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I guess it's a paradox for me, both selfish and selfless of me, I give but I also take in a fair exchange. Sharing the positive makes the positive that much better (understand?) while sharing the bad makes the bad easier to deal with, so we mutually share in selfless ways for selfish reasons. (To be clear, I don't consider all forms of selfishness to be bad nor all forms of selflessness to be good, both can be healthy or toxic.) If you don't know what I mean then ask, not everyone is wired this way.

You seem to be working with the assumption that getting along with others means giving up who you are and I don't hold to that notion. Nor do I believe that by eschewing a group that you somehow keep your self-identity pure, even the most radical individual is going to be affected by their upbringing and the people they interact with, even those they don't want to interact with, and even being shunned is going to continue to shape who you are as much as getting along. To me, radical individualism (ie, lone wolf in the context of this thread) is as unhealthy as radical conformity, and both are generally inspired by fear...though I can understand about getting away from civilization (if you have the skills) for a long while (the classical 40 days in the wilderness, but also becoming a true hermit) to radically reflect & grow without interference...but no matter what the influences of people you've interacted with for better and worse are still going to subtly and/or overtly affect even that (especially if you were to take books with you for inspiration) just as surely as the environment you're in will.

IP: Logged

YoursTrulyAlways
Knowflake

Posts: 7206
From:
Registered: Oct 2011

posted February 17, 2014 07:39 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for YoursTrulyAlways     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
.

IP: Logged

YoursTrulyAlways
Knowflake

Posts: 7206
From:
Registered: Oct 2011

posted February 17, 2014 07:39 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for YoursTrulyAlways     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
.

IP: Logged

Padre35
Knowflake

Posts: 3996
From: Asheville, NC, US
Registered: Jul 2012

posted February 18, 2014 12:47 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Padre35     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Spend enough time in the outer lands, there is no going back

There are times, when what folks know as "padre" goes away and I b/c such a massive ******* /self centered that I destroy everything that was built

As for Hera's OP..there are reasons why I'm Sigma..and I fight those reasons each day, every day

IP: Logged

Hera
Knowflake

Posts: 8636
From: Olympus
Registered: Sep 2010

posted February 18, 2014 11:36 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Hera     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by PixieJane:

You seem to be working with the assumption that getting along with others means giving up who you are and I don't hold to that notion. Nor do I believe that by eschewing a group that you somehow keep your self-identity pure, even the most radical individual is going to be affected by their upbringing and the people they interact with, even those they don't want to interact with, and even being shunned is going to continue to shape who you are as much as getting along. To me, radical individualism (ie, lone wolf in the context of this thread) is as unhealthy as radical conformity, and both are generally inspired by fear...

In my case it's a bit more profound than "getting along with others". I was mostly pondering about large groups, even masses, in which most certainly you lose your individuality (like a worker bee in its colony or a soldier in an army - the interest here is to reduce focus on individuality and to switch it to belonging to a group, with "a life of its own", whose interests become more important than your needs, desires and even life), unless you happen to be one of the leaders, as some pointed out here. Individualism obviously can coexist with collectivism and does in all societies, except some are more inclined towards one or the other. I happen to support the first, probably because I was born in a communist society and being preached Marxist ideology, I grew up loathing it in the end. I agree about the fear though, and that extremes should be avoided and a middle ground sought. Playing the subculture field is something that appeals to me too.

IP: Logged

Hera
Knowflake

Posts: 8636
From: Olympus
Registered: Sep 2010

posted February 18, 2014 11:50 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Hera     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by PixieJane:
[b]Sharing the positive makes the positive that much better (understand?) while sharing the bad makes the bad easier to deal with, so we mutually share in selfless ways for selfish reasons. (To be clear, I don't consider all forms of selfishness to be bad nor all forms of selflessness to be good, both can be healthy or toxic.) If you don't know what I mean then ask, not everyone is wired this way.

I know what you mean and fully agree.

IP: Logged

Violets
unregistered
posted February 18, 2014 01:07 PM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Oh...well, if we're talking about large groups or organizations, I don't mind being a part of something I believe in one hundred percent. I like to play a reasonably key role in those situations though, so it's best if it's a small non-profit organization that I work for, or donate my time to.

I've done really well in those situations, and while I don't lose my identity, everything I do for that group is out of love for the people we're helping, and I enjoy dedicating a lot of my personal time to it.

I can't do that as much now that I have a toddler, so I dedicate my time to the places that benefit him and other kids instead.

But it has to be something that I *really* believe in. Otherwise, I prefer to just do what I can on a personal level, sometimes networking with a handful of others that I go out of my way to connect with.

This has always been in social service and mental health related settings.

IP: Logged

Faith
Knowflake

Posts: 21731
From: Bella's Hair Salon
Registered: Jul 2011

posted February 18, 2014 01:29 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Faith     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I can get along with most people, so it really doesn't matter to me too much which group I am in, as long as the group agenda doesn't conflict too much with my values or impose itself too obnoxiously. For example, I'm in a play group with other mothers (and our respective children, of course), and many of these women have strong Christian values and pressure me to "get saved."

That's okay, I just endure these uncomfortable moments and focus on the positive. However, I would not join an officially Christian play group where I had to sign a document certifying my religious persuasion, even if the group functioned the exact same way as my informal group.

I have like zero patience for bureaucratic meddling in my social life. I need freedom to be myself, come and go. And I just find many groups too formalized and permeated through and through with BS/cult behavior to tolerate. I know they tend to be like that because I used to be more of a joiner, until I realized I'm not. But again, it's usually not the people I object to, just the context.

So basically, for now, I am not involved in any activity where there is a "leader," aside from the unavoidable circumstance of living under government rule.

IP: Logged

Faith
Knowflake

Posts: 21731
From: Bella's Hair Salon
Registered: Jul 2011

posted February 18, 2014 01:38 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Faith     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Violets:
I like to play a reasonably key role in those situations though...

Me too, I'm okay with a bit of limelight.

#LeoRising

IP: Logged

Violets
unregistered
posted February 18, 2014 04:09 PM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Faith:
Me too, I'm okay with a bit of limelight.

#LeoRising


Amen, sister!

IP: Logged

PixieJane
Knowflake

Posts: 9371
From: CA
Registered: Oct 2010

posted February 18, 2014 11:20 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for PixieJane     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Hera:
I was mostly pondering about large groups, even masses, in which most certainly you lose your individuality (like a worker bee in its colony or a soldier in an army - the interest here is to reduce focus on individuality and to switch it to belonging to a group, with "a life of its own", whose interests become more important than your needs, desires and even life)

Well in that case I lean individualist. My Libra makes it difficult to choose a side save in the most extreme cases and my Sag is fascinated by differences. Lines on a map are completely arbitrary to me and parades do nothing for me. If I ever did join the military (and I wouldn't, at least not in the US until the character changed) it would be purely as a job. But I haven't noticed many eager to feel they belong by signing up with the military (though recruiters do try to get boys to sign up ASAP and not being entirely honest about it).

Still, in the US anyway, the country can't become much of a hive mind because there are too many contrary views on what it even means to be an American, what American values are and what patriotic means (does it mean submission to the government or vigilance against it?), what's worth fighting for, etc. I heard a similar sitch existed in Soviet Russia despite all efforts to crush it (though officially they were unified, yet people continue to marry in the same ethnic groups, etc, and the Ukraine never got over its own resentments).

Ah, Marx...I've always thought he was overrated and have outraged people on both the left & right wing on explaining why. But that's another topic. I'm amazed people still take him serious. Not about the limits, flaws, and outright abuses of capitalism, but both his proposed solutions to it and his predictions of how the "forces of history" would shape the future (which were way off).

IP: Logged


This topic is 2 pages long:   1  2 

All times are Eastern Standard Time

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | Linda-Goodman.com

Copyright 2000-2019

Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.46a