posted October 10, 2014 02:37 PM            

I'm asking for all honest opinions here. Calling all experts to share what you see. I'm way too close and flabbergasted enough.

The dates came to me years ago. I copied them down without much thought. I ran them, but never with asteroids or any objective theme. Now that I have, here they are.

Thanks in advance. Really. Thank you. This isn't easy for me. But it's time. I know it's time.

posted October 10, 2014 02:42 PM            

The 19° Taurus SUN has RILEY at 24° TAU; the 17° Gemini SUN has it at 27° TAU, with PENDER at 10° GEM. The Taurean's PENDER is 12° GEM.

Yes, that's a bit uncanny.

I can't believe I'm looking at these charts. Further, I can't believe they have what they do ....

posted October 10, 2014 04:30 PM            

I've been looking at these for the past few hours. Floored, but noticing something. Realising ... something. There were too many things that looked as if they should be in one -- but they're in the other. To some extent, that's fine. But it was repetitive. I figured, for experimental purposes, I'd try something crazy. So I flipped the dates.

Here's how that turned out. I'm still quite new to these particular charts. But, so far ... wow.

This is uncanny.

posted October 10, 2014 05:56 PM            

Okay. So I should probably begin with an explanation; some sort of direction.

For the past few months or so, I've been investigating various elements of configurations, patterns and themes in certain synastries and composites; especially Draco to tropical comparisons.

First, I supposed I ought to introduce you to these two. Over these past fifteen years, I've come to know them as Riley Wingate and Penderan Fauste. Their story varies, as some components shift or appear and change rather suddenly, but there are a few things that remain consistent.

When I first 'met' each of them, I'd take point from different things -- signals, signs. I'd suspected they were both exhibiting strong Taurean or Geminian energy. Over time, I guessed she was the Geminian, and he the Taurean.

Today, when I ran the charts, finally, it seemed to make sense -- until I thought of the bizarre SUN to name asteroid links. See, it was her name on his SUN, and vice versa.

... Well, okay, I thought; perhaps they're so karmically linked that their names are on each other's SUN? More I thought on it -- no. My name is on my SUN, and both his first and last name in combo are conjunct his MOON.

That's when I thought ... what if I gave him her birthday, and vice versa? It's not as if they were ever set in stone. Is he any more Taurean than he is Geminian? ... Not really. The one thing that IS solid is the birth year. In 2001, his was 1969; hers was 1979. (The dates have varied over the years, but these were the original ones which first came to me.)

Doing so seemed to lock everything into place. Stunningly.

Now we see RILEY conjunct her SUN, 1°. PENDER isn't conjunct, but 6° from his. This makes much more sense. The fact that these would even BE near to, no less conjunct, the SUN is really phenomenal. As I'd mentioned, these are not slow-moving. To have these connexions is gobsmacking. It really does tell me that I'm on the right track here; these probably are the correct birthdates for these individuals.

Now, I didn't flip the dates unguided, so to speak. In seeing the strange links in one that ought to be in the other, I also couldn't help but notice what happened when I did so.