posted April 11, 2015 01:01 AM
Nicole,Huh. Well, there's nothing particularly mind-blowing about this synastry, which surprises me. It's clear that what you're experiencing is a multidimensional relationship. I'd take a look at the transits that are occurring at the moment, too, as that might shed more light. You may also be having some particularly potent progressed aspects as well. But, mind, those tend to be temporary.
What gets me is the fact that I saw your subject a week or so before you posted it; meaning, I thought it was here, but clearly, it was elsewhere. Great, I've got another concurrent eigenstate that's nearly indistinguishable from this one. Guess it's time I got myself a spinning top. Heh!
Now, you have started synastry requests with the first sentence containing, 'fated, karmic,' but the last one I can find with that syntax was 2012.
There are a few things which made your post so salient, which, now that I think on it, I don't recall how I'd responded. I merely remember, verbatim: 'does this synastry look karmic, fated, anything like that?'' Along with, 'there is a lot of weird 'coincidences'' with 'odd feeling of comfort and familiarity' and, specifically, 'fascination going on' and 'it's super intense'. Verbatim.
I think I most recall it because of the grammatical error. (Sorry!) Along with the fact that so many LL'ers wanted to attach 'fascination' with their synastries that week. Everything was 'fascination' this or 'fascination' that. But only yours had 'coincidences' (in quotes) with 'super intense'. So, it stuck out. I don't believe I responded, though .... I think I merely glanced, saw nothing particularly outstanding, and continued on.
But the fact it's happened there AND here now means that it's to be brought to both of our attention. Hm. Strange. Perhaps there's more going on in your Draconics.
So, I feel the need to seek some clarification -- before we delve too deeply into the 'meant to be' thing.
A quick look through your posted synastries from 2011 until now reveals a penchant for male Cancerians, as that's been the SUN of at least four men with whom you were romantically linked. You also reported to have never been in love before your boyfriend (January 2013, also Cancerian -- the lunar Gemini.) Were you never in love with the man you were with for 1 year and 4 months as of July 2011? It did certainly sound like a whirlwind relationship, but I'm curious about why you were never in love with him, despite your expressing his devotion to you.
Now, the first time the Scorpio's popped up was 04 April 2015, according to the posted date. It's a natal reading request rather than a synastry. It doesn't seem you'd mentioned anything about karma, fate, or even synastry in connexion to it there.
I'm also guessing you chose against having the baby when you were pregnant December 2012?
You were also having psychic dreams as far back as 2011. Most recently, March 2015, we even both kind of laughed at how 'boring' our 'prophetic dreams' are. You were also communicating with a man where the (sex) dream might have even been telepathic (August 2012).
I think these are my conclusions:
1. The synastry isn't enough where I'd warrant it's this particular man that's 'doing' these things.
2. You already have psychic experiences, including prophetic dreams, regularly.
3. You have a tendency to relationship-hop, or avoid them altogether, with an inconsistent and spotty romantic history.
So, is there anything particularly special about this man to you? What went wrong with your boyfriend in 2011? How did the pregnancy turn out? Did you and your Cancerian boyfriend (in 2013) decide to amicably break up, or was it more impacting?
Sorry for ALL of the questions, but if something is 'bleeding over' into multiple eigenstates, it's best to be as specific and clear as possible.