posted May 17, 2015 07:12 PM            

Sound crazy? Take it up with Einstein. Heisenberg. Bohm. Feynman. And, before that, Berkeley (erm, the philosophy, rather than university. Though, they do have a very nice modern physics department; Stanford is leading the charge when it comes to m-theory, and other-such research pursuits in the field of quantum mechanics.) As an astrologer, however, I've been possessed of the notion that there must be some way to understand the multidimensionality of existence via the lens through which we view so many things: our own charts.

And I believe there is. But, before I lift the curtain, take a trip down a bizarre memory lane with me; as the composer of my series, the fantastic Chad Lawson, graces my ears with his rendition of Chopin's famous 'Nocturne No 2, Opus 9, in E-Flat Major', on this New Moon, conjunct none other than ALGOL. Back to when yours truly was a but a precocious girl of twenty, training with the local FBI, receiving special material from the Academy in Quantico, Virginia, so that she would one day join them, and fulfill what was believed to be her destiny. It was, more importantly however, the day she would be 'introduced' to the spark that would subtly reorient her life for the next two decades.

Let's take the TARDIS for a spin ... back to 2001. January. 27th. Once the birth of none other than Charles Dodgson, who would achieve much greater fame as Lewis Carroll, the one that would bequeath to the world, Wonderland. But this day, a fateful conversation would give birth to something altogether different, yet eerily similar. Akin to lost pages of a forgotten manuscript, swiftly carried to a distant locale by a forgiving wind, rediscovered at just the right time, in just the right place, setting the stage for a future destiny to unfold.

Our tale begins here.

It will take us from the present, (tropical) into the 'past' (sidereal) and into the 'future' (Draconic). We'll explore the significant and crucial event charts, various synastry, notable progressions, relevant sidereal Personae charts (to identify individual eigenstates -- experimental technique), useful composites, the 'Ketu' chart, (reverse Draconic), the Vertex chart, experimental calculation techniques (such as the D60 and D30), prenatal eclipses -- and how they all synthesise to complete a complicated, ever-unfolding, but at least accessible multidimensional portrait.

So, if you're ready to join me on a journey two years (or fifteen, depending upon your perspective) in the making, then let's get started.

posted May 17, 2015 07:50 PM            

Will post in a little while. But for now, I'd like to ask about something that has been bugging me these last days -- first, your understanding of the draconic chart (i.e. showing the future) has proven to be accurate, at least in my case ; but ... where exactly is the 'time limit' between the tropical geocentric and the draconic ? The natal is supposed to show the present, so how come we can 'predict' accurately (most of the time) the ups and downs of a relationship, using only the regular synastry ? And what's the difference with the draconic, in terms of 'predictions' ?

Or is it that the natal only shows the potential of the relationship, and hence any connections to the draconic charts make this potential come true ?

posted May 17, 2015 09:00 PM            

The tropical is our window into the now; it's the most raw potential in its most basic form. It's what we've chosen to resolve what's resulted from the sidereal and best move towards the Draconic -- our next point of evolution. For a better idea of how the tropical is actually taking shape, the Huber degrees are staggering in their specificity. I've found that the 'reality' can obviously differ greatly from the potential indicated in the natal. The Huber can provide wonderful insight into 'how it's actually shaping up', given environmental factors and, of course, free will.

'Time limit' is a manufactured concept -- much like the dimension of time itself. Oh, it exists, but in a form we don't quite understand. So it's best to think of the charts as overlaying one another -- operating in tandem, to complete the full picture. That's why 'past' is in quotes.

Think of it as the sidereal showing what's going on 'elsewhere' that's incurred karma; things we've done or experienced that are affecting the here and now, but not taking place directly within it. (Though, I have found that the 'past' can mirror the 'present', but as the sidereal is a direct derivation of the tropical.)

What of the Draconic? Funny you ask that, Pel, as I've lately been ruminating on this particular quandary.

Recently, I came to the possible revelation that I keep viewing the present as 'the end'; to which point I've come thus far. That may not be true. I may be perceiving the 'future' as the past. It may even be the reason why this is so crucial to me. After all, what's a multidimensional cycle of violence if it's just in 'the past' or what's already transpired somewhere? Oh, absolutely, there may be some deep wounds incurred -- and there are.

But if time exists in all dimensions simultaneously -- past, present, and future occurring as one -- then 'the past' is just as relevant as 'the future', and we may be caught in the midst of the present, trying to prevent a future that's already 'occurred'.

It's a time loop. And there's no reason to think it's not far more common -- even status quo -- than we might know.

The skipped step may be less of an 'optional' means to evaluate or resolve karma than it could be to prevent an alternate future you're in danger of repeating.

posted May 23, 2015 04:24 PM            

Thanks for this piece of information. I am not very familiar with draconic or sideral charts, but since you have written some threads on the topic, I have become interested. Really in depth insights.

posted May 31, 2015 03:00 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Aubyanne:
Bumping this one, as it's time to add to it and continue the investigation.

---

Are you kidding ? I just got back today from a long series of music exams that kept me busy for a while, and I was just going to bump up this thread and my latest (which, incidentally, were created pretty close in time if my memory is good) and catch up with all that I've missed on LL this week.

I swear, even before I first posted on your threads (well, Indigo's, at the time), I noticed we were always perfectly in sync when it came to the feelings and moods of the day. To be honest, I was expecting a new post or update from your side when I came back home today. Well, we'll have to figure this out sometime.

posted May 31, 2015 04:18 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Peluches:

Are you kidding ? I just got back today from a long series of music exams that kept me busy for a while, and I was just going to bump up this thread and my latest (which, incidentally, were created pretty close in time if my memory is good) and catch up with all that I've missed on LL this week.

PS : I haven't forgotten your post above

---

posted June 14, 2015 03:54 PM            

Perhaps what we perceive as karma that's passed is actually unfolding interdimensionally, and we're given foresight and insight in order to prevent its continuation and end the cycle

In simple terms, it may not be so optional to clear our outstanding karmic debts; we may be trying to prevent worse things from occurring just ahead of us, where we can't quite see down the road.

What comes to mind is a film that perfectly illustrated this concept for me, and articulated deep feelings I had of it. Donnie Darko. I had a lovely correspondence with its creator years ago upon my first viewing of it in 2002. While the film isn't without fault, it remains the best representation of multidimensionality I've seen depicted.

(The above, a fan-created high-quality alternate trailer captures the spirit of the film.)

On that note, we'll continue our investigation. Curiously picking up from when this film was first shown at the Sundance film festival, but not yet officially released to the public.

posted June 15, 2015 01:01 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Aubyanne:
Hah! I'm not a bit surprised. And don't worry in the least. I absolutely understand. I wonder if it's partially a VENUS thing. But then we've not run our composite, have we?

---

Want to give it a try ?