Author
|
Topic: Two composites: Which one is better in terms of long term romance?
|
Yanmorg Knowflake Posts: 1317 From: Registered: Feb 2013
|
posted March 30, 2016 11:21 AM
(1) Both birth times are 100% accurate. (2) ONE birth time unknown.
IP: Logged |
comdoc Knowflake Posts: 388 From: Tucson Registered: Feb 2015
|
posted March 30, 2016 03:48 PM
The second composite--by a fair margin.IP: Logged |
Yanmorg Knowflake Posts: 1317 From: Registered: Feb 2013
|
posted March 30, 2016 04:31 PM
The house placements are most likely inaccurate FYI. One birth time is missing. How so? Based solely off the aspect grid? IP: Logged |
Orange Knowflake Posts: 4162 From: Georgia Registered: May 2009
|
posted March 30, 2016 06:37 PM
Comdoc,How do you calculate the ratios that you often speak of? IP: Logged |
todd Knowflake Posts: 721 From: Registered: Jun 2009
|
posted March 30, 2016 06:57 PM
the first composite has a Jupiter square to Neptune and Uranus . this is extremely unstable and unreliably. but this composite also is very inspirational with a stellium of psyche/mercury and the sun and another stellium of venus/pluto/moon .the second composite has a clear attraction as the moon/sun midpoint is conjunct to Uranus and Neptune with the mars/venus midpoint square these symbols. this complex is very intense but again unstable. actually neither look good for the long term as pluto is strong in both charts.pluto often brings a very selfish attitude that doesn't form a intimate emotional bond. the Jupiter square to venus can add to the longterm potential but even here the midpoint is conjunct to pluto,so all the emotional energy will be subservient to professional ambition. this is good if you are both on the same trajectory but rarely does this show that you will both evolve in the dame direction, hence long term uncertainty. todd IP: Logged |