posted September 30, 2016 07:40 AM            

if you have time, could you have a peek at the composite here and tell me what do you think the connection is about?

It`s difficult I know, as one birthtime is not known, so the angles cannot be considered and Moon can be from 7-13 Aquarius.

i just thought it looked so peculiar with that line up of planets.

posted September 30, 2016 07:12 PM            

the eros/psyche midpoint is square to the node and opposed to amore which indicates a very romantic and hot connection. very idealistic . but pluto opposed to psyche often brings a cruel streak to the affection, backhanded compliments or such.this aspect often likes the pleasure of added pain or discomfort emotionally.

the pluto/satrun midpoint is square the sun which tends to reinforce the dark side of the emotional connection. this is not real affectionate and tends toward domination. eros/psyche can give such a etheric feeling that one can be lead down pleasure/pain avenues not anticipated.
the venus/mercury/Neptune stellium can bring a "spiritual" feeling to the sexuality and their minds can seem in harmony.
the mars/sun/Jupiter stelluim bodes a robust social/physical attraction .
satrun trine this stellium would bring stability .
except for the eros/psyche connection, I don't get a real strong affection between them. it seems to be more of a friendship or a relationship revolving around the workplace.
though eros is square to juno, indicating a long term interest on her part, the Saturn/Uranus midpoint is conjunct to eros which indicated he is wishy washy or non committal about the long term.

posted October 01, 2016 01:35 PM            

I'm curious about the nature of the connection, as it stands. Pluto-Node is always interesting... and Amor square the nodes, also fascinating.

posted October 01, 2016 01:42 PM            

happy to read you here again!
How are you?

Anyway, as I pointed out in the first post, one birthtime is not known, so the angles are not accurate, though funny enough P and me have Uranus on the MC near to there as well. lol

In fact this composite seems to reflect - in modified- ways Pīs and my composite a bit. like the shared Pluto-NN-conjunction, equally wide, just on different sides of the Nodes.
And while here it is Amor square the nodal axis, for P and me it is Amor conjunct the NN and so on.

A Venus-Pluto-square exchanged for a Venus-Pluto-sextile

A Sun-Mars-sextile exchanged for a Sun-Mars-conjunction.

posted October 01, 2016 01:47 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by yungang_grotto:

I know what you mean about this line-up being rather curious... a huge stellium like that always becomes a head scratcher, although then we look to dispositors and house rulers for how it actually plays out... (going back to look again..)

---

that is actually a great idea. Curious why I did not think of it, as i am so big on dispositors usually.

Well of course here it is Jupiter, and Jupiter is part of the stellium. It also means that Jupiter gets the final say in everything here it seems. Maybe shared with Saturn, as dispositor of Moon, but then again they are on speaking terms anyway, with that trine.

Another thing that I found peculiar is -excluding midpoints- a lack of 4th harmonic aspects, no squares or oppositions to inner planets. The Saturn aspect is actually a trine.

this is highly unusual for me, usually at least a few squares are present, and i don`t fear those, they seem to make quite an impact.

Maybe the missing of this here speaks volumes about how it took me about 10 years of crossing paths with that individual (very very fleeting of course) to really start paying attention to them, which frankly just happend because he did. though this seems to be a common theme for me, noticing someone pays a lot of attention to me, makes me go wonder and want to figure out WHY. I am still doing so with P. lol

posted October 01, 2016 02:08 PM            

Also thought it interesting the difference between the subtle poetic but maybe not quite real conjunction of Mercury-Venus-Neptune, as compared to the quite Here-and-Now physical outgoing conjunction of Sun-Mars-Jupiter (oh and as I see BML is conjunct there as well).

Found it also kind of interesting to see that Mars is on the Venus/Juno-mp with only 5 minutes of arc.

another thing - not in the composite, but in the DAvison, that I found interesting was that there is a trine between Venus in Sagittarius and Mars in Leo, putting the Venus/Mars-mp onto the NN.
but that`s not even the thing that I found most peculiar but the fact that Davison Venus is conjunct my NN and Davison Mars is conjunct his NN.

I have no clue about that though, just was surprised about where he came from. lol
I am not in love with him, or crushing on him or something like that though. I just am intrigued and curious. That`s honestly speaking my perspective at the moment.

posted October 01, 2016 11:57 PM            

quote:

---

Oringinally posted by Ceridwen:
Thanks for the elaboration, but that is actually not what I meant.
What I was asking was why you thought it was the female in this composite that would be more taken with the intensity of that nodal connection?

---

Oh. I follow the gender of the Greek asteroids.though it is written that sexual distinction disappears in composites of opposite sex relationships, is inaccurate. There are significant cultural variations to these numbers .In western European and American cultures 90 % of the time gender is reflected correctly.
In strongly patriarchal cultures, gender correlation is higher. Some northern European societies seem furture along in discarding sexual stereotypes.
So the criteria I look to try go eliminate this prejudice, is to place the male symbols on the partner that really Caused the relationship to come to fruition.