posted October 25, 2016 05:49 AM            

Anyway, in this thread girl you wrote: http://www.linda-goodman.com/ubb/Forum35/HTML/006042.html

You wrote:
"the "worst" aspects in a composite in my opinion are:
- the sun, chiron or the ascendant opposite or square saturn (the whole relationship seems like a burden and too harsh and draining on the two to be dealt with)

- the sun opposite or square chiron (* very common in romantic or "true love" relationships which often end in tragedy)

- mercury opposite or square neptune (almost no honesty between the two)

- sun opposite or square uranus (annoyingly on and off)

- mars or the sun opposite or square neptune (very common in abusive relationships)"

I wanted to ask you or todd,
In that list there's about 5 potential aspects,
if a composite has 3 of those,
let's say sun square saturn/chiron square sun/sun square uranus

can the relationship still survive if there are trines. Or is it that with those aspects, doesn't matter how many trines the relationship will be hard and may not last?

posted October 25, 2016 07:43 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by girlwiththerainysoul:
Hi existential!

I do consider Todd a master in composites and the analysis of the midpoints, so maybe you should also consider his analysis too along with mine.

what I said above, is the result of one year analyzing charts of over 200 couples. I'm afraid to say that the aspects I have mentioned in that post (which I still stand by) were present in charts of couples who either divorced or had such a tough relationship right from the start that everyone around them would just wonder why they don't already get a divorce. this is very tough, I know, because I myself have had at least 3 relationships with the hard chiron/sun/saturn aspects. the most painful one had chiron square the AC. I must also say that in such composites, the relationships rarely really happens or is official for other people to see and call them a couple. but if one or both inside the relationship force it into happening, they should be ready for a tough one. in my opinion, under these circumstances such relationships can survive:

- the composite sun MUST be either conjunct or opposite venus, and trine or sextile moon. also, either one or both of the composite bodies receiving the hard aspect, must receive a supporting aspect (trine, sextile or conjunction) from the composite sun. for instance, if there is a mars square neptune in the composite, either mars or neptune must form a supportive aspect from the composite sun

- composite vertex on the DC, and along with it the aspects mentioned above must also exist

- either the composite sun or the moon (or both if they're conjunct) must be in the 7th composite house

- the composite sun or moon must trine or sextile the composite saturn if there are hard urnaus aspects

- the composite nodes also must receive supportive aspects from the sun, moon, venus or saturn

- the composite chart must not be scattered

- sometime the composite pluto trine chiron helps too (if chiron/saturn/sun hard aspects are present)

overall, the oppositions in the composites are less stressful and problematic than the squares. but the supportive aspects must exist anyway

* P.S
I just edited that post of mine in the other thread and added "the composite mars in the 12th" to the aspects too. I have found it be very tough as well.

---

I really thank you for your response, girl. It's a lot to assimilate. There's some questions I'd like to run by you if it's possible. Some ideas i want to consult with you on.
Would I be able to contactr you in private? If you agree the admin will tell me your email in private.