|
Author
|
Topic: midpoint or reference place composite?
|
melinazonk
Newflake Posts: 2
From: Switzerland
Registered: May 2018
|
posted May 27, 2018 12:49 PM
  
hello everyone!
i'm a newbie here, my name is Nora, i'm 27 yrs old and i'm from switzerland (sorry for my not-so-perfect english!) i read this forum for months and now i asked to join hoping to get some more answers and finally talk with people with my same interests  what do you think about the composite methods on astro.com? i'm studying my composite and there's some huge differences with one or another method, but i'm so emotionally involved that i can't feel what's the one who suits the best, or maybe i should say there's aspects that i recognize more "ours" in the first and others in the second one.
but as i said earlier, i'm not able to have a rational eye here so...
what do you think about? i could do the same question for davison chart, corrected version vs. uncorrected version! IP: Logged |
capricorncheriscty
Knowflake Posts: 431
From:
Registered: Nov 2017
|
posted May 27, 2018 12:56 PM
Midpoint composites are the most accurate. Davison and reference place are the same thing I think and they are not very correct in their way of calculating the placements. I read somewhere they go by the calendar rather than the actual astrological placements in the sky.IP: Logged |
melinazonk
Newflake Posts: 2
From: Switzerland
Registered: May 2018
|
posted May 27, 2018 01:25 PM
thank you for your answer!i don't know how interpret our composite asc in gemini... i don't feel a lot of gemini vibes between us actually :/ and we even have the sun in 3d house! maybe it's because is conjunct the IC but i really see ourselves in a 4d house sun or composite cancer asc. where do you seek when you don't recognize yourself in some aspect?  IP: Logged |
Lindaland
UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! 
