posted September 27, 2018 07:22 AM            

Is one of the parties particularly attached to the relationship, according to the charts?

THANK YOU EVERYONE!

posted October 03, 2018 10:47 AM            

Still I like to compare the natals with the Davison's chart and I will do on the other thread.

I Keep in line with the rule that, for composites, only the conjuncts, oppositions and (maybe) squares are relevant. And, because it's midpoint, always within a low orb too.

You both are born around the same time. So, apart from outer planets, even you Junos, Jupiters, nn are the same too. Therefore, the tops charts Juno conjunct the CCs Jupiter, exact, is of lowerer significance.

We constrain then to the personal charts and points.

What I see is:
CC Moon is on first charts Vertex.
The second chart, it's Mars is opposite CC Vertex, and square the CC NN.

These points are highly sensitive and significant. It's difficult for me to conclude who's more attached (as per the ops question). I'd say that both people are "triggered" for the relationship.

To answer who's more attached, I'd look further at the Davison (I think it's pretty equal though).

But, on that other thread where you've posted the Davison and synastry, MyRealName makes an excellent point about the quincunxes in your synastry. And then you also go on to describe exactly how quincunxes feel: they are interesting at first and feel growing. But, over time, an impasse is reached, and the two people can feel they have nowhere to go, and there's a bitter reality to deal with.

posted October 03, 2018 10:57 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by sassaqua:
Good idea to have on new thread.

Still I like to compare the natals with the Davison's chart and I will do on the other thread.

---

Thanks so much, really appreciate your insight. V curious

quote:

---

I Keep in line with the rule that, for composites, only the conjuncts, oppositions and (maybe) squares are relevant. And, because it's midpoint, always within a low orb too.

---

Huh, you don't think squares and conjunctions are of equal significance in the composite? Don't think I ever heard this. Very interesting

quote:

---

These points are highly sensitive and significant. It's difficult for me to conclude who's more attached (as per the ops question). I'd say that both people are "triggered" for the relationship.

To answer who's more attached, I'd look further at the Davison (I think it's pretty equal though).

But, on that other thread where you've posted the Davison and synastry, MyRealName makes an excellent point about the quincunxes in your synastry. And then you also go on to describe exactly how quincunxes feel: they are interesting at first and feel growing. But, over time, an impasse is reached, and the two people can feel they have nowhere to go, and there's a bitter reality to deal with.

---

This is exactly how it's felt. I raise these questions about who is more triggered or attached because one of the last things he said to me was that he could see the breakup was better for me than him, and that he could understand it. So I've been wondering whether one of us really has been more attached to the relationship throughout, or that the relationship was "better" for one party than the other. I wonder because my perspective too has been that it asked a little more of me. And that perhaps I was the one who loved more. Loving someone is a very vulnerable and scary experience. I always wondered if he felt as devoted.