posted October 16, 2018 08:03 PM
This quote below is from another thread on Juno opposite Juno (http://www.linda-goodman.com/ubb/Forum35/HTML/004527.html).I thought I'd start a new thread here regarding challenging aspects from the NATALS to the Davison. And, NATALS to composite too if desired. (Although, really, they should probably be different threads because it gets complicated).
As yungang_grotto says (quote below):
Because the composite chart is a midpoint chart, it makes sense that challenging aspects from the natals to it would be a force that is "demanding something of the person in terms of their planets" - a call to action for the natal chart. Essentially, because those natal planets trigger those midpoints.
But, how do CHALLENGING aspect from NATAL to COMPOSITES feel? If they are "tense" how many are comfortable? Can they be felt by the people involved?
Feel free to post your composite and natals.
Also, as the composite and Davison chart are QUITE DIFFERENT animals.. how does the same question apply to Davison charts?
Are challenging aspects from the natals to the Davison also calls to action? Or are they more barriers or resistance? Do they increase conflict or confusion? Is this felt? Is it more pulling/pushing? Or just "action" that happens/draws the natal person into the Davison relationships?
Feel free to post your Davison and natals.
What are your challenging aspects from your NATAL to your Composite or Davison like for you?
That's my intro into this topic
quote:
Originally posted by yungang_grotto:
I have it by sign (Virgo-Pisces) and I'm predisposed towards thinking it is complementary to have the opposition We also have a Juno-Amor opposition. AanyhowAn opposition in synastry often means a powerful attraction and a vibing with often complementary energies; though opposites in terms of their needs and wants these two people will have qualities which are immediately recognizable as magnetic in relation to the other in terms of navigating partnership, equality, etc.
By sign and house we'll have the areas of life/psyche/qualities which are being expressed. It really depends on sign and house when interpreting oppositions.
Think of Sun opposite Sun, any like planet in opposition with the other. How does that play out? It can create a struggle, a very dynamic urge to focus on that planet. It is kind of like a double whammy in its significance, I believe.
The midpoint of the two Junos is going to form a square to both personal planets in the composite chart. This is significant I think in understanding the potential for tension which can arise from same-body oppositions in synastry. There will always be a square to that planet from the natal of each to the composite planet. So automatically a tension, an active element is present. I've not been reading natal squares to the composite planets as negative lately; I interpret them as simply demanding something of the person in terms of their planets.
Would be interested in hearing other takes on this..
THis is interesting.. "I've not been reading natal squares to the composite planets as negative lately; I interpret them as simply demanding something of the person in terms of their planets."
so... squares from the natals to the composite as not "negative" (is what yungang_grotto view is), but more a "demanding something of the person in terms of their planets". It makes sense with a composite, conceptually at least, because it is made up of the midpoints.
But isn't "demanding something of the person in terms of their planets" a kind of stress?
What about the Davison though? what is the impression people have on squares from natal to Davison?
Any thoughts or experiences out there? Does anyone have a heap of squares to a composite or a Davison that they can refer to as a successful relationship? Or to analyse here?